Hi,
Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts of yum
based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Unfortunately, it seems that the current maintainer of Yum in Debian
haven't been active for a long ti
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
> working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts of yum
> based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Indeed.
> Unfortunately, it seems that the current maintainer of Yum
I forgot to add...
The current maintainer of yum AND rpm (Anibal Monsalve Salazar
) has been unactive for quite a long time now, there
are outstanding very serious bugs without even any reply from him since
2006. We really need something to be done for rpm as well.
I have contacted the people fro
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I forgot to add...
>
> The current maintainer of yum AND rpm (Anibal Monsalve Salazar
> ) has been unactive for quite a long time now, there
> are outstanding very serious bugs without even any reply from him since
> 2006. We really need something to be done for rpm as well
* Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
> Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
(incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out
that SHA1 are not sensibly sortable, just in case.
Cheers,
--
Ade
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
>
> > Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
>
> I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
> (incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point ou
Hi Folks,
I filed the following bug (515175), which raises 2 questions:
In Bug 515175, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Package: file-roller
> Version: 2.22.4-2
> Severity: normal
>
> On a default gnome-desktop system (Lenny), .deb files (application/x-deb)
> are associated with file-roller, but it can't
Hi,
> UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
> block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
see where it will block inclusion into Debian. About the licensing issues
I already said that their license
retitle 515134 ITP: ircservices-church -- IRC Services for IRC networks
providing services like Nick- and ChanServ
Hi,
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424844 .
> Inclusion of ircservices in Debian may be problematic.
I missed this one when I looked for ITPs/RTPs. I've did
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 05:37:46PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> One of the criticisms I could make (and made live at your
> presentation @FOSDEM), is the lack of semantics (as in Semantic Web
> W3C standards) there (somehow what I mentioned also in
> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/web
* Bastian Blank:
> GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
> just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
> themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
GNUTLS has rejected RSA-MD5 signatures in X.509 certificate chains
s
hiya,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> > * Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
> >
> > > Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec0c
> >
> > I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for
On Sat, Feb 14, 08:12:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Is it stable enough, even for unstable? :)
I've been using it for a little while and I think so, yes.
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 14, 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I don't know what your further plans of versioning are for Git snapshot
> (incrementing the micro release number?), but I thought I'd point out
> that SHA1 are not sensibly sortable, just in case.
Right. I suspect some releases will start popp
* Jonny Lamb [Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:55:42 +]:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 08:12:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > Is it stable enough, even for unstable? :)
> I've been using it for a little while and I think so, yes.
Do you have binary packages anywhere? I'd like to give it a try without
having to com
On 2009-02-14 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Bastian Blank:
>> GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
>> just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
>> themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
> GNUTLS has rejected RSA-M
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joerg Heizmann
* Package name: mediawiki-smwhalo
Version : 1.4.0
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/halo-extension/
* License : GPL
Description : The Halo extension provides usability improvements to
Semantic Me
El Sáb 14 Feb 2009, Luciano Bello escribió:
> even when it was being updated since 3 years ago
what i meant: "it has *not* been updated since 3 years ago". The last version
is from Feb 7th 2006.
sorry for my English, luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:08:49 +0100
Luk Claes wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
> > working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts
> > of yum based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
>
>
Luk Claes wrote:
> Why is the python-iniparse also needed? That's not clear from the bug
> report.
Very simple: yum crashes with a not-so-nice error message when I try to
boostrap a CentOS complaining about the iniparse python module not being
present.
I should have add it to the bug report, but
]] sean finney
| when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
| ~.git.. this way you get lots of relevant info, the
| fact that it's a prerelease of , the date the snapshot was taken,
| the fact that it's a git snapshot, and the sha sum. and of course it's
| sortable.
If
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: michaelh.debian+gnur...@googlemail.com
* Package name: gnurush
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Sat, Feb 14, 16:25:41 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Do you have binary packages anywhere? I'd like to give it a try without
> having to compile it.
Sure. I threw some i386 and amd64 packages here:
http://people.debian.org/~jonny/gitg/
--
Jonny Lamb, UK
jo...@debian.org
signature.asc
De
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Why is the python-iniparse also needed? That's not clear from the bug
>> report.
>
> Very simple: yum crashes with a not-so-nice error message when I try to
> boostrap a CentOS complaining about the iniparse python module not being
> present.
>
> I shou
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:59:34PM +0100, Rondal wrote:
[...]
> there are currently no other IRC Services packages in the
> repositories
[...]
Unless I misunderstand your assertion or am taking it out of
context, I would hold up at least the dancer-services package as a
counterexample (though I ex
Hi,
according to the current lenny release notes, Debian Live is going to become
official with lenny for x86. I tried Debian Live several times and always had
issues with it. So, I decided to test Debian Live a bit and found that
several issues still applied. I discussed with Daniel Baumann abou
>> there are currently no other IRC Services packages in the
>> repositories
> [...]
>
> Unless I misunderstand your assertion or am taking it out of
> context, I would hold up at least the dancer-services package as a
> counterexample (though I expect there are others, this is one I
> actively us
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 19:38:16 +0100, Rondal wrote:
> >> there are currently no other IRC Services packages in the
> >> repositories
> > [...]
> >
> > Unless I misunderstand your assertion or am taking it out of
> > context, I would hold up at least the dancer-services package as a
> > countere
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: voms
Version : 1.9.2
* URL : http://edg-wp2.web.cern.ch/edg-wp2/security/voms/voms.html
* License : non-standard but DFSG free
Description : Virtual Organization Membership Service
In
Florian Weimer wrote:
Yesterday several people started to complain that they could not longer
connect to their ldap servers, many of them using pam-ldap and nss-ldap.
A quick look showed certificates in the chain which was signed with MD5.
Are you sure this isn't #514807?
Also see #514
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: lfc
Version : 1.7.0.6
* URL : http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/LCG_File_Catalog
* License : GPL2+
Description : LHC Computing Grid File Catalog
The File Catalog (or Replica Catalog) maps
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 01:08 +0100, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
> The LCG (LHC (Large Hydron Collider) Computing Grid) File Catalog (LFC)
^
Hadron
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: cgsi-gsoap
Version : 1.3.2.2
* URL :
http://glite.cvs.cern.ch/cgi-bin/glite.cgi/org.glite.security.cgsi-gsoap/
* License : their own DFSG compatible
Description : GSI plugin for gSOAP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lazarus Long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: sqldeveloper
Version : 1.5.3.57.83
Upstream Author : Oracle, Inc.
* URL : http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/sql/
* License : Non-free Pro
34 matches
Mail list logo
