On 08:50 Mon 26 Jan , Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
SZ> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:23:33PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>> However it seems that there's no source of this JS in public access,
SZ> Why so?
SZ> I think this is the key of the issue.
sources are found. see
http://lists.debian.org
On 26/01/09 at 08:44 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:12:43PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The upcoming wording doesn't add a way to distinguish between build
> > dependencies required for the build and ones required for testing.
>
> I think that was already clear to
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:59:04AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What is the real goal of adding Build-Depends-Test: ?
[ Note that I'm not pushing for that, but still, for the sake of the
argument ... ]
> The goals of "nocheck" are different, and more useful, are bypassing
> the test suite all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelle de Jong
I would like to get this program into the debian repository, I will package it
and
upload it to debian mentors, I will be looking for a sponser and mentor. This
package is
part of a larger group of packages that will form the pct-desktop-en
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:59:04AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The goals of "nocheck" are different, and more useful, are bypassing
> > the test suite allows faster builds in all cases.
>
> The goals of Build-Depends-Test are the same of "noche
Le samedi 24 janvier 2009 à 15:39 +, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > Clearly that’s not the case, since the original issue happens over
> > D-Bus. In this case, not for authentication, but clearly the application
> > launched as root can connect to the session bus.
>
> Well, clearly something el
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:44:01 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to be a reasonable
> request, the fact that there should be enough packages with enough
> test-only dependencies, which I'm not convinced it is the case.
Are around 1200 arch:any libfoo-pe
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:52:00PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:44:01 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to be a reasonable
> > request, the fact that there should be enough packages with enough
> > test-only dependencies, w
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:13:10 +0100]:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:52:00PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:44:01 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to be a reasonable
> > > request, the fact that there should be e
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 19:13, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:52:00PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> Are around 1200 arch:any libfoo-perl packages enough? They usually
>> duplicate the run-time dependencies in B-D-I for the tests
>
> OT, but why do they need to *duplicate* these
On 26/01/09 at 19:15 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Mike Hommey [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:13:10 +0100]:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:52:00PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:44:01 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > > > Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to b
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:21:54 +0100]:
> It's a chicken-and-egg problem: binary deps are not known until
> you build the binary package...
That is simply not true, and not the case with many of our interpreted
languages.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: haskell-testpack
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/testpack
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Haskell
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: haskell-convertible
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/convertible
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Haskell
On 26/01/09 at 19:26 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:21:54 +0100]:
>
> > It's a chicken-and-egg problem: binary deps are not known until
> > you build the binary package...
>
> That is simply not true, and not the case with many of our interpreted
> languages.
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:51:24 +0100]:
> On 26/01/09 at 19:26 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:21:54 +0100]:
> > > It's a chicken-and-egg problem: binary deps are not known until
> > > you build the binary package...
> > That is simply not true,
On 26/01/09 at 23:08 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:51:24 +0100]:
>
> > On 26/01/09 at 19:26 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:21:54 +0100]:
>
> > > > It's a chicken-and-egg problem: binary deps are not known until
> > > >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: audiopreview
Version: 0.1
Upstream Author: Arnaud Soyez
URL: http://audiopreview.codealpha.net/
License: GPL v3
Description: com
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> This whohas command is awesome, great job!
>
> Yes. And the openSUSE URLs suck!
Please file a bug. I'm surprised you sent that mail instead of filing a bug.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
Currently if a user is logged in while logrotate renames the /var/log/wtmp
file then the command "last -i -f /var/log/wtmp.1" will give a result such as
the following:
root pts/010.0.0.1 Fri Jan 16 13:17gone - no logout
Also the command "last -i" will not display anything
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:04:51PM +1100, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> > Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> This whohas command is awesome, great job!
> >
> > Yes. And the openSUSE URLs suck!
>
> Please file a bug. I'm surprised you sent that mail in
In article <200901271009.35031.russ...@coker.com.au> you wrote:
> Would it hurt to have a duplicate start entry in a wtmp file? If not then is
> there any reason not to duplicate the entries from sessions in progress from
> the wtmp.1 file to the wtmp file so that "last" will display all session
retitle 468951 'ITP: libconvert-binary-c-perl -- preprocessor and parser for C
type definitions'
thanks
Hi all,
libconvert-binary-c-perl is needed by [[!debpkg: bioperl]] 1.6, that is needed
by libbio-graphics-perl, that is needed by GBrowse, that is needed to browse
DNA sequence, in particular
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:04:51PM +1100, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> > Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> This whohas command is awesome, great job!
> >
> > Yes. And the openSUSE URLs suck!
>
> Please file a bug. I'm surprised you sent that mail i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
> reassign 512921 xserver-xorg-video-neomagic
Bug#512921: general: pixel artifacts on window drag
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `xserver-xorg-video-neomagic'.
>
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> This whohas command is awesome, great job!
>> Yes. And the openSUSE URLs suck!
>
> Please file a bug. I'm surprised you sent that mail instead of filing a bug.
Against the openSUSE pac
26 matches
Mail list logo
