Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-dbi-perl
Version : 2.64
Upstream Author : Andrew Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-DBI/
* License : Dual GPL/
Am 2008-10-30 09:35:32, schrieb Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo:
> A good solution would be to improve the free/libre software available in
> Debian, since you seem to claim that SDCC is an option as a development
> tool to this said micro-controller. Is it a 8051?
Yes, several of my projects use th
Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
> I wish I understood the reasoning here - putting aside the fact that
> most of the software in Debian is under a copyleft licence and so we
> *must* provide the source. Why is the source for the radio on my wifi
> card any *less* critical than the source for the driver
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package name: speutils
Version : (see below)
Upstream Author : Kristian Jerpetjøn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://code.google.com/p/speutils/
Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package name: spu-medialib
Version : (see below)
Upstream Author : Kristian Jerpetjøn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://code.google.com/p/spu-medial
I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
"delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He wanted to
note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
released to the community and they couldn't have predicted that it would
vi
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
> "delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He wanted to
> note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
> rele
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
> "delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He
> wanted to note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the
> time when Sun release
- "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
> their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
> license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
> latter would probably be bes
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:07:07PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> > Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
> > their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
> > license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
> > latter
- "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is copyrighted by Sun, not some particular employee, so AFAICT
> digging up who wrote it will not be necessary.
Please understand that asking Sun to relicense source is a little like asking
Debian to hurry up and release Lenny. Differen
David Given wrote:
> One potential reason is that in most jurisdictions you are legally *not
> allowed* to use custom wifi firmware. Consider that most wifi systems
> are software radios and that the software is entirely capable of
> exceeding all regulators' transmissions strength limits or subver
12 matches
Mail list logo
