> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 21:09 +0100, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: nostromo
> > * URL : http://www.nazgul.ch/dev.html
> > Programming Lang: C
> > Description : small, simple, fast and secure httpd
>
[..]
> As has been sa
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held to
Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
-devel, I feel like there was
NW> An attacker would be insane to select this example as a
NW> vehicle.
Attacker can use many ways (all variants from this list, for ex), one of
its can work. Why you think that this variant is not work?
--
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006
On Monday 25 August 2008 07:16, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
> > reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held
> > to
>
> Even though I overread the th
On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> filed.
Yes, please. I think the only way the damage of this bad bug filing can be
mitigated i
Hi Ben,
thanks for your work on Debian Jr. and for acknowledging that you don't have
time/a heart for it anymore!
On Thursday 07 August 2008 12:46, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> The time has come for me to give up the [0]Debian Jr. project for
> someone else to lead. While I still have a clear vision f
TK>> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
TK>>> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
TK>>> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held
TK>>> to
TK>>
TK>> Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
TK>
Basic question: how do I handle building external kernel modulesfrom
different packages that depend on one another?
(As for the workaround of getting either into mainline: tried, and
doesn't work. At least not now)
I have a module called "Mainmod" in package "mainmod-source", and it
depends on co
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:43:16AM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> For those who needs to choose a (light) webserver, this page is meant to
> gather pros and cons of each one :
> http://wiki.debian.org/WebServers
>
> (Contributions are welcome.)
Both boa and lighttpd require much more installed s
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:15:39AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > * Update the appearance of Debian Jr.
> > * Incorporate the winning entry in the logo contest into Debian
> > Jr. and the web site.
>
> Can you give a pointer to that logo please?!
http://www.debianart.org/cchost/?ccm=/debia
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:57 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> NW> An attacker would be insane to select this example as a
> NW> vehicle.
>
> Attacker can use many ways (all variants from this list, for ex), one of
> its can work. Why you think that this variant is not work?
Because it is in the
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:09 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> > package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> > filed.
>
> Yes, please. I th
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:09 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2008 22:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please take responsibility for providing the missing information to the
> > package maintainers, and for correcting the false positives that you've
> > filed.
>
> Yes, please. I th
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:15:39 +0200
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for your work on Debian Jr. and for acknowledging that you don't have
> time/a heart for it anymore!
Thanks. It's hard to let go, but it's really for the best if someone
else will carry on.
> Is that vision wri
Le Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:16:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
>
> - timing wrt the release
> - timing wrt the "half of the developers are VAC" status we generally
> have in August
> - the obvious lack of preparation
In addition, security issues should better be reported upstream first s
2008/8/25 Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While I would not have any problem with that if Edu cared for the
> project and preserved the vision I described above, I have always
> felt my own ideas for Jr had nothing to do with school and might indeed
> by swallowed up by school concerns if we
NW>>> An attacker would be insane to select this example as a
NW>>> vehicle.
NW>>
NW>> Attacker can use many ways (all variants from this list, for ex), one of
NW>> its can work. Why you think that this variant is not work?
NW> Because it is in the documentation, not the script. Didn't you read t
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NW> Because it is in the documentation, not the script. Didn't you read the
> NW> reply? It is not a route of attack, it is AN EXAMPLE in the
> NW> documentation!
> This script marked as executable.
> User can start i
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 14:17 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> NW>>> An attacker would be insane to select this example as a
> NW>>> vehicle.
> NW>>
> NW>> Attacker can use many ways (all variants from this list, for ex), one of
> NW>> its can work. Why you think that this variant is not work?
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 161978 important
Bug#161978: general: /usr/share as a symlink breaks EVERYTHING, but only
sometimes
Severity set to `important' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
severity 161978 important
thanks
Hi,
downgrading severity, as this is about an old issue with tetex and because
there is probably even a lintian check for this already. (Too lazy to confirm
now, thus I'm also not reassigning the bug to lintian yet.)
regards,
Holger
pgpmaN4blyB01.pgp
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:59:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #278246,
regarding Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width in most places
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:01:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #279983,
regarding general: scsi emulated cdrom ide unit can't be correctly mounted
first time
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:04:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #354654,
regarding general: fat32 gets corrupted
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
severity 414938 normal
thanks
Hi Steven,
downgrading as networking works for 99,9% of our users just fine :-)
The bug smells a bit like 472680, have you been able to fix your network
issues since then?
regards,
Holger
pgpZZSq598vS7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 414938 normal
Bug#414938: general: network connection issues, 90% connection slowdown
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 484277 emdebian-tools
Bug#484277: buildd.emdebian.org: RPATH issues
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `emdebian-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 482994 normal
Bug#482994: general: gnome applications fails to print with cups on remote
printer, authorization request not fullfilled.
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> tags 482994 +unreproducable
Unknown tag/s: unreproducable.
Rec
severity 482994 normal
tags 482994 +unreproducable
thanks
Hi Federico,
I very much believe that this bug is caused by a configuration problem on your
side, as I can print from gnome applications to a local cups printer just
fine. Can you please elaborate? Else I'll close this bug in a week.
r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 128852 -patch
Bug#128852: Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 482921 -wontfix
Bug#482921: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
Tags were: wontfix upstream
Tags removed: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
2008/8/25 Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Miriam, good luck at the revitalisation front! I'm willing to support
> your effort by sharing experiences and technically with the DIS tools
> (formerly known as CDD tools).
Thanks a lot!! I will gladly take your word and be able to benefit
from yo
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I have different plans for Debian Jr than those in from Debian-Edu if
I was to adopt that project. It would be nice to talk about it. I'll
try to find time to write a text on my view about the future of the
Debian Jr Project as soon as I can.
From my po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 482994 +unreproducible
Bug#482994: general: gnome applications fails to print with cups on remote
printer, authorization request not fullfilled.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438885 important
Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:24:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line the logwatch package implements this
has caused the Debian Bug report #132505,
regarding debian status script(s)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
> downgrading severity, as this is about an old issue with tetex and because
> there is probably even a lintian check for this already. (Too lazy to
> confirm
> now, thus I'm also not reassigning the bug to lintian yet.)
As far as I can see,
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:55:11PM +0200, Florian Rehnisch wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I got the news that apt-howto* packages were removed from
> sid (as they were from lenny before).
Yes. Some basic apt features have been changed and apt-howto author
admits it is not up-to-date.
http://b
Hi, I agree to close this...
> 278246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278246
> From: Paul Pogonyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width in most places
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:09:51 +0300
>
> Package: generic
Am Freitag 22 August 2008 schrieb =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio?= Brito:
> I obviously want to run Debian on it so that I downloaded the powerpc
> basedebs.tar from woody, a statically linked busybox (for chroot),
> unpacked and manually installed these packages, upgraded to sarge and
> now to etch. Thi
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:32:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line checked by lintian already, thanks Adam!
has caused the Debian Bug report #161978,
regarding general: /usr/share as a symlink breaks EVERYTHING, but only
sometimes
to be marked as done.
This
Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Giacomo Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
>>
>> Yes, I find the talk very interesting.
>>
>>> So, after more than twelve hour
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
Yes, I find the talk very interesting.
So, after more than twelve hours of boredom on an airplane and ha
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> as you know the state of the various syslogd implementations in Debian well,
> could you please comment on, reassign and/or close #78782? ;-)
>
We nowadays have the virtual packages system-log-daemon and
linux-kernel-log-daemon.
The available syslog solut
On 2008-08-25 20:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Michael,
as you know the state of the various syslogd implementations in Debian well,
could you please comment on, reassign and/or close #78782? ;-)
We nowadays have the virtual packages system-log-daemon and
linux-
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2008-08-25 20:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> The current default syslog for Debian is rsyslog.
>>
>
> I just installed using Debian lenny beta2 installer, and then did a
> dist-upgrade to sid, my syslog is still
> sysklogd (though apt-get install rsyslog shows no conflict
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christophe Mutricy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libass
Version : 9.5.0
Upstream Author : Evgeniy Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libass
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:28:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: syslogs in debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #78782,
regarding confusion among system log daemons
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodule-inspector-perl
Version : 1.05
Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Inspector/
* License : same as Perl (G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: numptyphysics
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Tim Edmonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://numptyphysics.garage.maemo.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Christian Perrier wrote:
>> This is far below the quality I expect from a mass bug filing that's been
>> reviewed by debian-devel. Mass bugfilings at RC severity need to be held to
>
> Even though I overread the thread when Dmitry posted his intent to
> -devel, I feel like there was *no* strong a
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Anyhow, we have to choose among:
> 1) document and make the procedure work
> 2) bug the packages which are using the undocumented procedure
Seconded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:16:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
>>
>> - timing wrt the release
>> - timing wrt the "half of the developers are VAC" status we generally
>> have in August
>> - the obvious lack of preparation
>
> In addition, security issues should b
Hi,
I have seen that many packages are rejected from NEW [1] due to either
licensing or poor packaging and we know the reasons [2] too.
It will be very helpful if Rejection is also mailed to ITP (where it
apply) so, that anyone can look at actual reason and fix problem
(packaging, contacting upst
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen that many packages are rejected from NEW [1] due to either
> licensing or poor packaging and we know the reasons [2] too.
>
> It will be very helpful if Rejection is also mailed to ITP (where it
> apply) so, th
55 matches
Mail list logo
