Re: Standard way to disable services

2008-07-27 Thread Lightning
you should use the rcconf to disable the services apt-get install rcconf 在 2008-07-26六的 13:18 +0200,Harald Braumann写道: > Hi, > > quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there > doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that. > > Many services have a file in /etc/defaults,

Re: Intel Atom Processor

2008-07-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Kushal Koolwal wrote: > > The Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) effort is one to provide a good desktop > > experience on subnotebooks / UMPCs by using a different desktop > > representation of the same apps. > Hmm..I think the following text confused me from this website: > http://w

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Reinhard Tartler [Wed, Jul 23 2008, 04:36:39PM]: > > How about activating it the first time they send a gpg-signed mail to > > the mail interface? > > My point is that I don't have the impression that Debian Developers want Fine. And mine tends to differ. > to have an LP account act

Re: Standard way to disable services

2008-07-27 Thread Harald Braumann
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit : > >>> quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/i

Scour.com invite from vijay singh

2008-07-27 Thread vijay singh
Hey, Did you hear about Scour? It is the next gen search engine with Google/Yahoo/MSN results and user comments all on one page. Best of all we get paid for using it by earning points with every search, comment and vote. The points are redeemable for Visa gift cards! It's like earning credit ca

Re: Standard way to disable services

2008-07-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200 > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > >> Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Br

Re: Intel Atom Processor

2008-07-27 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:29:48 +0200 Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > many thanks for your reply. Your web sites are indeed what I wanted to see, > possibly a bit too far away from John Doe who just bought such a machine > as a Newbie Linux user, Naturally. The site is made by and for t

Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics

2008-07-27 Thread RalfGesellensetter
Dear list, today I got a reminder from Linux Counter [1] to update my registration. Since their announcement in 2001 [2] it seems that the amount of registered users didn't grow much - as opposed to the perceived growth of GNU/Linux popularity. It is mainly interesting to view statistics on how

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #include > * Reinhard Tartler [Wed, Jul 23 2008, 04:36:39PM]: > >> > How about activating it the first time they send a gpg-signed mail to >> > the mail interface? >> >> My point is that I don't have the impression that Debian Developers want > > Fine.

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I think we should encourage packager to contact upstream with simple > > "hello!" message and he (or myself) should be part of active upstream ML. > > When I had upstreams, I always used to do this. > > Often

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:36 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > #include > > * Reinhard Tartler [Wed, Jul 23 2008, 04:36:39PM]: > > > >> > How about activating it the first time they send a gpg-signed mail to > >> > the mail interface? How about simply

Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies

2008-07-27 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:19:24AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > Then I tried sbuild to build using my schroot setup, and found that by > default it disables signature checking. So I stopped using sbuild until > I find a way to reenable it. Just to follow up: - sbuild initially copied what the bui

Re: Lenny frozen

2008-07-27 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On söndagen den 27 juli 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Hi, > > We just edited our hint files, so that all packages now need human > review in order to go to testing. Hmm, that sounds too cryptic. Let's > try again: > > Lenny is now frozen! Wheee!!! Aw, shoot. Not that it's a good Idea

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:58:57 +0100 Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Why force activation in the first place? All the information needed to >"activate" a DD account already exists - our GnuPG fingerprints, our DD >email addresses and full names. If an email is received that is signed >by

Bug#128852: Qantas Airlines crashes in LAX

2008-07-27 Thread Wadman
Kidnapper on the loose in New York, teen curfew instituted http://cqcs.com.br/hotnews.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008, RalfGesellensetter a écrit : > Dear list, > > today I got a reminder from Linux Counter [1] to update my > registration. Since their announcement in 2001 [2] it seems that the > amount of registered users didn't grow much - as opposed to the > perceived growth of GNU/Li

Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008, vous avez écrit : > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008, RalfGesellensetter a écrit : > >> Dear list, > >> > >> today I got a reminder from Linux Counter [1] to update my > >> registration. Since their announcement in 2001 [2] it seems that > >> th

Business proposal to present you as our Foreign beneficiary,

2008-07-27 Thread Maxwell Williams
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO SAFEGUARD $25.5M,TO UR AC WE WILL SHARE 50-50,NO RISK INVOLVE, GET BACK TO ME FOR MORE DETAILS - Maxwell Williams

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:58:57PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:36 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > #include > > > * Reinhard Tartler [Wed, Jul 23 2008, 04:36:39PM]: > > >> > How about activating it the first time they se

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:33:17 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 03:58:57PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: >> On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:36 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> > Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > > #include >> > > * Reinhard Tartler [Wed,

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 05:53:28PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >That requires LP to know who is or isn't a DD. Currently it has no such > >knowledge, and I think it would require a fair amount of discussion to > >decide how best to get such information, with a none-too-elegant outcome > >(spe

Bug#132505: Rice slips up during opening address

2008-07-27 Thread hilpas
Steve Jobs suffers a sudden heartache and is in critical condition http://flatpro.gmxhome.de/fresh.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

2008-07-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:01:46 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 05:53:28PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> >That requires LP to know who is or isn't a DD. Currently it has no such >> >knowledge, and I think it would require a fair amount of discussion to >>

Re: procinfo maintainership

2008-07-27 Thread tabris
tabris wrote: it appears that neocalderon.net is now a squatter domain. Meanwhile, I'm unsure who to contact regarding a replacement for procinfo that I started last year, procinfo-ng. http://freshmeat.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ Basically the goals included a) fixing all the 32bit/64bit proble

Re: Chao ban ve may bay

2008-07-27 Thread Phong Thanh
Toi muon hoi gia ve may bay quoc te danh cho nguoi di dinh cu My

Bug#492673: ITP: libregexp-optimizer-perl -- optimizes regular expressions

2008-07-27 Thread Carlo Segre
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libregexp-optimizer-perl Version : 0.15 Upstream Author : Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Regexp-Optimizer/ * License : Artistic Programm