Bug#486192: RFH: darcs -- an advanced revision control system

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the darcs-server package. Specifically, I need one or two volunteers to help me by testing prospective packages (prior to uploading to Debian) to make sure that darcs-server works correctly. Since I don't use darcs-server perso

Some debian project machines uncontactable?

gluck, merkel, samosa and raff uncontactable (192.25.206.* network problem?) I don't know anything more at this time, but wanted to push a small message out so that others know it isn't just them and lists and IRC are both still up, as far as I can see so far. We now return you to your regula

Thank you for signing the guestbook

Thank you for signing the guestbook! -Christian & Christina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ecki is retiring (Debian RT)

owner 486000 ! thanks Vincent Bernat wrote: >> net-acct -> can probably be removed from distribution? > > I know that it is widely used in some places despite the existence of > better solutions. I prefer to adopt it instead of letting it getting out > of Debian. I will take care of this pack

Bug#486242: ITP: bzr-loom -- Focused patch plugin support for Bazaar

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: bzr-loom Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Scott James Remnant <[EMA

VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?

Greetings! I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian Etch is still version 0.8.6a and I'm wondering why you people haven't done a package of version 0.8.6e yet? I'm thinking of maybe tryin

Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?

On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 20:35 +0200, Björn Johansson wrote: > Greetings! > > I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on > an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian > Etch is still version 0.8.6a and I'm wondering why you people haven't >

Re: Correct way to rename a binary package

Luca Capello wrote: Since I want to support smooth upgrades, I need to do the following: Package: hunchentoot Version: 2.0 Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1] Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0) Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0) Package: cl-hunchentoot Depends: hunchentoot I was under

Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?

Hi, But here is your answer. On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 08:35:36PM +0200, Björn Johansson wrote: > > Greetings! > > I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on > an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian > Etch is still version 0.8.6a an

Re: VLC 0.8.6a - Why hasn't the package been upgraded?

Hi, > If you want to use very latest softwares (even with some trouble), use > * testing (now lenny) or > * unstable (sid) or create a backport, or look at backports.org if there's one already. Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Finge

Thank you for signing the guestbook

Thank you for the support and signing the guessed book. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]