Please follow http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct>
and avoid sending individual copies of messages also sent to the
lists, since I haven't asked for that.
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:27:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Please change th
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 05:08:57PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> and avoid sending individual copies of messages also sent to the
> lists, since I haven't asked for that.
Oops, sorry, I did mess up with the recipients in order to add back the
bug report to them (and I'm doing it also now), in order t
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 05:08:57PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Regardless, 'res' is an overly general name. The package should be
> > more specific to the fact that it's an OCaml library. The time to
> > choose an appropriate name is now rather tha
Hello.
I tried to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this without success,
so this time I will Cc: debian-devel, as it would be extremely strange
that I'm the only person with this problem.
Executive summary: master.debian.org, where I receive debian email,
has stronger spam filtering than lists.deb
Hello!
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 03:13:31AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> ~/.quiltrc:
>
> for where in ./ ../ ../../ ../../../ ../../../../ ../../../../../; do
> if [ -e ${where}debian/rules -a -d ${where}debian/patches ]; then
> export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 08:44:57AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:27:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Please change this to a package name that is less generic, and
> > conforms with other OCaml library packages. 'libres-ocaml' would be
> > better.
>
> This is the s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: fqterm
Version: 0.9.1~beta
Upstream Author: fqterm, FireLakeWalker, edyfox
URL: http://code.google.com/p/fqterm
License: GPLv2
De
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the gutenprint package. I no longer have time
to maintain it, and it deserves to be maintained to a better standard
than I can currently manage. Not only am I short of time, but I no
longer have an inkjet printer for testing and bug fixing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On May 03, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> FLAVORS := std
>> ifeq ((findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),amd64 ia64 ppc64 s390x),)
>> FLAVORS += lfs
>> endif
>>
>> Like this?
> AFAICT this will match also if DEB_HOST_ARCH=s390.
>
> Anyway, I
On Sun, 04 May 2008, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Executive summary: master.debian.org, where I receive debian email,
> has stronger spam filtering than lists.debian.org, as master seems
> to use some kind of "content filtering". As a result, some spam
> messages distributed by lists.debian.org are rejec
Philipp Matthias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 03:13:31AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> ~/.quiltrc:
>>
>> for where in ./ ../ ../../ ../../../ ../../../../ ../../../../../; do
>> if [ -e ${where}debian/rules -a -d ${where}debian/patches ]; then
>>
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:00:45PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I tried to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this without success,
> so this time I will Cc: debian-devel, as it would be extremely strange
> that I'm the only person with this problem.
>
> Executive summary: master.debian.org, where I
I have packaged the Ra extension for just-in-time compilation to GNU R (see
ITP #479233 for details). It comes as a tarball to be installed on top of
the GNU R sources.
So I created a new hybird tarball of the two sources. Not elegant as it
creates a 16mb tarball containing a copy of GNU R's 16
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:55:59PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> I have packaged the Ra extension for just-in-time compilation to GNU R (see
> ITP #479233 for details). It comes as a tarball to be installed on top of
> the GNU R sources.
>
> So I created a new hybird tarball of the two so
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As an alternative, could I just start from Ra source, and then in
> debian/rules obtain r-base's orig.tar.gz, untar it and then apply the Ra
> sources to it? Or is that too fragile?
My understanding is that the buildds don't necessarily have apt-sr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: funpidgin
Version : 2.4.1
Upstream Author : A lot. Can't be listed here!
* URL : http://funpidgin.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 11375 March 1977, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> As an alternative, could I just start from Ra source, and then in
> debian/rules obtain r-base's orig.tar.gz, untar it and then apply the Ra
> sources to it? Or is that too fragile?
No. Do not assume that there is *any* network connectivity at buil
On 29/04/08 at 11:54 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> FWIW, I think NMUing a package shouldn't end up with a sourceful upload
> but should instead have a .diff.gz, whether it's a native package or not.
When NMUing a native package, which problem would it add to upload a
source package with a single .ta
Colin Watson wrote:
> Yes, I've been seeing the same thing. It's usually just an irritation,
> but I guess some day I'll hit a threshold and get unsubscribed from a
> bunch of lists.
Wouldn't it be possible to configure the mail server to filter the mail
based on the header content? That is,
* I
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:24 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: funpidgin
> Version : 2.4.1
> Upstream Author : A lot. Can't be listed here!
> * URL : http://funpidgin.source
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:57:10PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, I've been seeing the same thing. It's usually just an irritation,
> > but I guess some day I'll hit a threshold and get unsubscribed from a
> > bunch of lists.
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to configure the ma
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have packaged the Ra extension for just-in-time compilation to GNU R (see
> ITP #479233 for details). It comes as a tarball to be installed on top of
> the GNU R sources.
>
> So I created a new hybird tarball of the two sources. Not elegant as it
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:29:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have packaged the Ra extension for just-in-time compilation to GNU R (see
> > ITP #479233 for details). It comes as a tarball to be installed on top of
> > the GNU R sourc
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:28:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:24 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: funpidgin
> > Version : 2.4.1
> > Upstream Auth
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I should definitely talk more to myself.
>
> Thanks to all for the follow-up. Will no assume network access and go
> the low-key route for packaging.
>
> Dirk
Maybe buy some sweets or nice glass of milk to win yourself over.
MfG
Goswi
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:24 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: funpidgin
> > Version : 2.4.1
> > Upstream Author
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:28:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:24 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: funpidgin
> > Version : 2.4.1
> > Upstream Auth
On lun, 2008-05-05 at 01:19 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> my understanding is that this is a 'protest' fork made to add a
> feature
> that the upstream did not want(the resizing). So as long as the
> upstream
> resists, it should survive.
I find that a bit too much for a complete fork. Couldn't this
28 matches
Mail list logo
