Package: stardict
Severity: normal
Hi, Andrew Lee and Anthony Fok!
I use stardict, I like this dictionary very much, but there is a great
discomfort: at every new installation it is necessary to download the
dictionaries from the site http://stardict.sourceforge.net by hand and
to install them.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:25:06AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> As a kind of example, let me post what Steve and I did set for the
> samba package maintenance ML, run by mailman:
Thanks a lot for this snippets!
Can you please add them on the wiki somewhere and point them to from the
Alioth d
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:28:24AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Currently debian/testing ships a very old copy of ffmpeg, dated from
> 0.cvs20070307. We, the ffmpeg maintainers (Fabian Greffrath and myself)
> do not consider that version of ffmpeg acceptable for release in debian
> lenny. Many
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-weberror
Version : 0.8a
Upstream Author : Ben Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, Mark Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/py
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-webob
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pythonpaste.org/webob/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
On 11361 March 1977, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I happen to often send mails to @packages.debian.org while
> conducting my NMU campaigns for l10n bugs hunting.
> From time to time, I still get such mails rejected because the said
> package uses a mailing list as "Maintainer:".
I did hate that too
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: haskell-dataenc
Version : 0.10.2
Upstream Author : Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/dataenc
* License
removing debian-release, as this discussion is not relevant for the
next debian release.
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a related note, what are the plans for ffmpeg encoding? As it is, the
> current lenny package seems to have stripped away most everything, leaving
> th
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:18:13AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Debconf 7, the ffmpeg maintainers had a conversation with James Troup
> from the ftpteam about mpeg encoders in the ffmpeg package. The ftpteam
> was pretty surprised about the accepted encoders, and admitted that they
> were ac
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 08:25]:
> As a kind of example, let me post what Steve and I did set for the
> samba package maintenance ML, run by mailman:
>
> [snip]
Thanks for the configuration example, it is really helpful.
I also set the following for all mailing-lists-
On 20/04/08 at 03:55 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I assume that in _all_ [1] cases an attempt is made to contact the
> > maintainers first?
> >
> > I also assume that this is only done after a package is also no longer in
> > stable or, as long as it is su
On 20/04/08 at 12:04 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Note that this works better when the list moderator is
> reactive. We usually have more than one person acting as list moderators.
The "listadmin" package is great if you want to moderate mailing lists
without using mailman's web interface.
Fellow devs,
I'm encountering a lot of bitching with using svn-inject (from
svn-buildpackage) over an NFS share. A quick survey of fellow DDs told me
that they don't build packages on an NFS share anyway but instead use
their local disks. And - voila - svn-inject finally worked from a local
di
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I'm wondering what other developers do. Are you using NFS at all?
> Are you putting all your work under repository control and check the
> files out to a local disk and back in to the server?
I choose Bazaar http://bazaar-vcs.org/> where possible fo
Hi Christoph,
> So I'm wondering what other developers do. Are you using NFS at all? Are
> you putting all your work under repository control and check the files out
> to a local disk and back in to the server? I consider keeping $HOME on NFS
> but symlink $HOME/debian to /mnt/localdisk/debian
> Why did I guess the name of binutils' maintainer correctly _before_
> looking into the PTS?
You're not alone.
> I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
> we released lenny without multiarch.
That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:29:20PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > [ffmpeg]
>
> For those of us not living in jurisdictions where software patents appear
> very enforceable, is there currently any way to build our own, unstripped
> packages? (Sort of like the DVD-CSS "example" script downlo
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
> > we released lenny without multiarch.
>
> That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sitting
> on way too many packages, stopping progres
Hi all,
I was going to package iotop:
http://guichaz.free.fr/misc/#iotop
It is a simple Python script for displaying a top-like listing of the
amount of I/O each process on the system is doing.
I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another
package it should be added to.
An
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For those of us not living in jurisdictions where software patents appear
> very enforceable, is there currently any way to build our own, unstripped
> packages?
Yes, there is! The ffmpeg-free source package in experimental now ships
a get-orig
Hi Paul,
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 19:37]:
> I was going to package iotop:
>
> http://guichaz.free.fr/misc/#iotop
>
> It is a simple Python script for displaying a top-like listing of the
> amount of I/O each process on the system is doing.
>
> I'm not sure if it warrants its o
After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
empty value, mind you).
The generated Makefiles set 'LDFLAGS = -z,defs', and as LDFLAGS was
previously in the environment, this new value is exported to processes
spawn
[Paul Wise]
> I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another
> package it should be added to.
>
> Any thoughts?
Perhaps along with top in procps?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
> dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
> empty value, mind you).
Two of my packages were affected by this uglyness, too.
If you use LDFLAGS as _make_ variable to build up the linker
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> > I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
>> > we released lenny without multiarch.
>>
>> That's indeed the way the maintainer seems to work, and he keeps sit
* Bernd Zeimetz [Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:03:54 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
> > dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
> > empty value, mind you).
> If you use LDFLAGS as _make_ variable to build up the l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: omnicodec
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/omnicodec
* License : GP
( "_blank" )
( "_blank" )
Carte de Crédit, Prêt Personnel, Prêt Voiture, Prêt Travaux, Prêt Immobilier,
Dette Familiale, Découvert Bancaire, Impôt et autres
( "_blank" )
Exemple détaillé d'une proposition
Partners Finances, cliquez ici ( "_blank" )
( "_blank" )
( "_blank" )
( "_blank"
[Roger Leigh]
> If you do want to wait for permission/refusal, you might find you
> never get a reply and end up waiting forever. So, why not wait long
> enough for a reply, say a fortnight, and then go ahead and hijack it
> after that if you have no response (and tell them in the mail that
> thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another
>> package it should be added to.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Perhaps along with top in procps?
The python dependency should not be introduced - so if we dont have a python
based system man
Le Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
>
> Before you bring this to the tech ctte and such, don't you need a refusal
> by the maintainer?
Hello,
It reminds me when I had to deal with a DD who thought he orphaned a
package, but did not. It lead to a situation where a fe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: codecgraph
Version : 20080406
Upstream Author : Eduardo Habkost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://helllabs.org/codecgraph/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Hello,
I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
[1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser
printers).
Martin Pitt did not accept my request for NO reason and told me to
Patrick Ringl wrote:
But - back to the actual topic:
Is this common sense in debian? Not respecting responses to WNPP's and
even ignoring volunteers work? I am gutted!
It is common practice to retitle the RFP (request for packaging) to ITP
(intend to package) and changing the owner of the
On 20-Apr-08, 16:33 (CDT), Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another
> >> package it should be added to.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >
> > Perhaps along with top in procps?
>
> The
Hi Christoph,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:47:38PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> I'm encountering a lot of bitching with using svn-inject (from
> svn-buildpackage) over an NFS share. A quick survey of fellow DDs told me
of which kind? Personally I do use svn-buildpackage on a NFSv4 mounted
home
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 09:06:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> > I bet that multiarch gets included into Ubuntu about two weeks after
> >> > we released lenny without multiarch.
> >>
37 matches
Mail list logo
