On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:55:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> (...) If I'm running Debian, I know it well that I'm running Free
> Software and there's no warranty. Especially after having a wall of
> text pushed right in my face on login (by default), any subsequent
> notices are not only redu
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
>> This (still quite informal) group tries to gather people
>> maintaining font packages in Debian (and CDDs).
>
> "and CDDs" is redundant, because CDDs are included in Debian.
> Damn, one more point to cha
Quoting José L. Redrejo Rodríguez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
José sent a request to join the group on Alioth which I grantyed yesterday.
> I'll be glad in joining to the group if it does not mean more work ;-)
Not really. It just means you check out
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-fonts/packages and
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Sorry, I often misuse "CDD" to mean "derivative distributions"..:-)
Yep. I'm quite bored of this (which is not your fault but common
practice because of the very badly choosen name). I just registered
"CDD renaming BOF"
at
https://penta.
El mar, 11-03-2008 a las 07:26 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
> Quoting José L. Redrejo Rodríguez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> José sent a request to join the group on Alioth which I grantyed yesterday.
>
>
> > I'll be glad in joining to the group if it does not mean more work ;-)
>
> Not real
Hi,
I uploaded ELinks 0.12~20080127-2 a few days ago to experimental. If
you happen to use ELinks, please test this and report any bugs etc. that
you may find. If you don't use ELinks, now is probably a good time to
start using it :)
This version of ELinks is based on an upstream 0.12 GIT snaps
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hyantesite
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : serge guelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hyantes.gforge.inria.fr
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : ge
Hi,
I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
depending on a replacement package or conflicting with the old
one], and no active notification to th
Hi Karl,
* Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-11 13:51]:
> I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
> it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
> automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
> depending on a replacement package or
Le mardi 11 mars 2008 à 05:23 -0700, Karl Chen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
> it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
> automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
> depending on a replacement pack
On 11/03/08 at 05:23 -0700, Karl Chen wrote:
> I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
> it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
> automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
> depending on a replacement package or conflicting wit
Hi,
Olivier Berger schrieb:
> FYI, according to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464021 I suppose that
> users having subscribed to packages in the PTS should now be notified of
> such removals (which used not to be the case, and worried us a great
> deal some weeks ago ;)
this
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:23:45AM -0700, Karl Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
> it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
> automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
> depending on a replacement pac
Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think
> it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no
> automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package
> depending on a replacement package or conflicting w
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/03/08 at 05:23 -0700, Karl Chen wrote:
> To get the list of packages that are installed, but are no longer part
> of the archive, I use
>apt-show-versions |grep 'No available version in archive'
Or use the aptitude frontend for package management which will show s
Alle 14:57, mar 11 marzo 2008, Andreas Bombe ha scritto:
> It's no active notification, but aptitude lists all installed packages
> that aren't in any distribution included in sources.list under "Obsolete
> and Locally Created Packages". Verifying that this doesn't include any
> packages that I ex
Hi,
And I filed this as Bug#470495. I wish someone fix this bug :)
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple of weeks ago The Guardian ran a story about computing and DNA
sequencing where I work at the Sanger Institute, and it's nice to note
that they actually mention that we use Debian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/28/research.computing
Just thought you might like to read
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:51:14PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded ELinks 0.12~20080127-2 a few days ago to experimental. If
> you happen to use ELinks, please test this and report any bugs etc. that
> you may find. If you don't use ELinks, now is probably a good time to
Cheers,
Here's a poke from a user of PocketPC. Since OpenSync supports Google
Calendar, I'd be really interested that it works with WM. How's it going?
Also, a side-question.
Is it possible to use upstream synce-sync-engine without compiling
other parts of SynCE from source, that is, combin
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Ivan Vucica wrote:
> Here's a poke from a user of PocketPC. Since OpenSync supports Google
> Calendar, I'd be really interested that it works with WM. How's it going?
SyncEngine and its OpenSync plugin only provides information to OpenSync. I
haven't hea
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:59:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
[...]
> I'd suggest to file wishlist bugreports against any package
> management frontend (not including apt) that does not in some way
> mark packages that are no longer available in the archive (or
> rather, in the sources defined in the
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:23:45 -0700, Karl Chen wrote:
> Thoughts? What have I missed? Existing solutions or non-problem?
Not a general solution probably but maybe interesting for you is the
following RSS feed:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~joerg/removals/removals.rss
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2008, 05:23 -0700 schrieb Karl Chen:
> Thoughts? What have I missed? Existing solutions or non-problem?
> How can we move towards implementing something like this? What
> other ideas are there for dealing with disappearing packages?
A solution that’s possible without
Anthony Towns writes:
> Beyond that, any additional uploads of dpkg will be REJECTed
Therefore dpkg 1.15.2 is now available here, as sources and i386
binaries - a complete upload ready to go into sid:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ian/dpkg/
Thanks to the miracle of using git properly, I am
Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> A solution that’s possible without big changes would be a package
> "removal-notifier" which contains a manual list of removed packages
> (which needs to be maintained by someone of course) and can tell the
> user about packages he has installed but that are on that lis
tags 460501 + help
thanks
Hi,
Actually, I have already prepared a package for the new upstream release
(4.57)[0]. The package is almost ready, it's just that I don't know how
to update lzmp patch[1], I would need some help for that...
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://git.debian.org/?p=colla
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 4:41:57 pm Ian Jackson wrote:
> Meanwhile I see that Guillem is hard at work making future merges more
> difficult.
>
> He is polishing revision logs by rebasing changes, reorganising
> commits into a different order, moving code between files,
> gratuitously reformatting[
Package: mingw32
Version: 4.2.1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: policy 8.2 (?)
Hi,
After installing mingw32, I noticed the following files in
/usr/libexec/gcc, they should be installed to /usr/lib/gcc instead:
/usr/libexec
/usr/libexec/gcc
/usr/libexec/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc
/usr/libexec/
> On 2008-03-11 06:52 PDT, Lucas Nussbaum writes:
Lucas> If you are only interested in a few packages, you could
Lucas> subscribe to them on the PTS. I recently worked on a
Lucas> script to notify PTS subscribers ('summary' keyword)
Lucas> when the package is orphaned or remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi debian-devel,
I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2] for several
bugs and many new upstream releases hold back on Debian, and he
communicated me that he is not longer interested on maintaining it any
more.
Unfortunately, my sugge
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 March 2008 4:41:57 pm Ian Jackson wrote:
> > He is polishing revision logs by rebasing changes, reorganising
> > commits into a different order, moving code between files,
> > gratuitously reformatting[2], etc.
>
> What is it that people don
Hi all,
I would like to resolve #467123 (non-free code in chromium), to do so
I need Mark J. Kilgard to relicense some of his code (TexFont.cpp and
TexFont.h). Does anyone know how to contact him? The alternative is to
rewrite the code or find another implementation.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.de
Hi,
I'd like to clarify few more things, which have been brough up the past
few days. Even if I don't usually accept open invitations to flamefests
(re the OP).
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:42:48 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 09-
Hi Guillem,
Ian wrote that you recently committed 402 diff lines of stuff
like this:
-static void usage(void) {
+void
+usage(void)
+{
It's easy to see negatives such as making it harder to merge
long-awaited features. What positives do you see for Debian?
--Mike Bird
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:19:42PM +0100, Luca Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Alle 14:57, mar 11 marzo 2008, Andreas Bombe ha scritto:
> > It's no active notification, but aptitude lists all installed packages
> > that aren't in any distribution included in sources.list under "Obso
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:06 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> Hi Guillem,
>
> Ian wrote that you recently committed 402 diff lines of stuff
> like this:
> -static void usage(void) {
> +void
> +usage(void)
> +{
>
> It's easy to see negatives such as making it harder to merge
> long-awaited fe
Alerta tributário: aos profissionais liberais e autônomos
NUNCA "COMPRE" NOTA FISCAL
Evite sempre este expediente, quando for necessário apresentar Nota Fiscal
para receber sua remuneração por seviços prestados.
Em primeiro lugar, isto é ilegal e deixa voce irregular junto ao fisco.
38 matches
Mail list logo
