Hi Russ,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:26:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Does anyone know the right contact point to ask Ubuntu to stop making
> pointless changes to a Debian package? See:
> http://patches.ubuntu.com/x/xfonts-jmk/xfonts-jmk_3.0-16ubuntu1.patch
> I mailed the person listed i
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> into the "hardening" svn tree, in case other people want to contribute
> more stuff.
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:46:55PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wr
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> mplayer doesn't compile with PIE due to the various ASM routines. (I've
> noted this failure mode in the wiki[2] now.) However, with everything
> else enabled (including FORTIFY_SOURCE), there was no measurable
> difference (it was below the percentage diff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -good plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to
be well tested, working and being compatible with the Elisa licensing
model.
* Package name
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pietro Abate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocamlduce
Version : 3.10.0
Upstream Author : Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cduce.org/ocaml.html
* License : LGPL, QPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -bad plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to
be working well but with code needing more QA (unittests, code reviews).
* Package name:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -bad plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to be
working well but with code needing more QA (unittests, code
reviews). Moreover the plugins
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:55:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Isn't this going way out of proportion? That's the first I hear from any
> *refuses* to merge, as opposed to "the merge not going to be done the way I
> would like it to happen", and "it is taking too long for it to get
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 03:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:26:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Does anyone know the right contact point to ask Ubuntu to stop making
> > pointless changes to a Debian package? See:
> >
> > http://patches.ubuntu.com/x/xfo
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> > into the "hardening" svn tree, in case other people want to contribute
> > more stuff.
>
>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Just for future reference, it'd probably be better to run more than 5
> tests of each population in the future, as 5 tests means you'll only
> detect very large differences in performance at any reasonable level
> of signifigance.
I
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:55:37AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> t.test(x=c(10.87,10.873,10.854,10.809,10.877),y=c(10.807,10.824,10.963,10.84,10.838))
> What tool is this you're using?
GNU R. Takes a while to get into, but hard to beat for statistics.
>> data: c(10.87, 10.873, 10.854, 10.809, 10.8
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Definitely. I'll upload a new revision removing this gratuitous
> difference and leave a note to make clear it's appropriate to sync the
> package.
Thank you very much to both you and Steve. If this happens again, I'll
mail the Ubuntu maintainer add
While these benchmarks should show any differences in raw processing
performance, there's also the question of what differences the hardening
measures make to application start-up times. PIE in particular should cause
some slowdown when the executables are first run, but it would take some
oth
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in
dpkg, and dpkg maintenance)"):
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Raphael seems to have the power to block your packages but he has
> > no rational excuse. Can the tech committee overrule Raphael or
> > does Debia
Clint Adams writes ("Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg
maintenance)"):
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:55:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Isn't this going way out of proportion? That's the first I hear from any
> > *refuses* to merge, as opposed to "the merge no
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > What's the difference, really? Isn't it a case of people on all sides
> > trying to control each other instead of cooperating?
>
> What would you like me to do ?
Either do the supplementary work or wait patiently with some _friendly_
nagging from time t
On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my view
> of the situation ...
May I suggest then that if no dpkg maintainer objects here
within 48 hours t
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
>> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my view
>> of the situation ...
>
> May I suggest then that if no
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:49:30PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Better bounce handling
> ~~
> We checked our bounce handling because we have more than 500 bounces
> for some lists, and in the process found that we didn't have working
> bounce handling for other lists (other-*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torin Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rain8net
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Torin Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rain8net.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, P
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> May I suggest then that if no dpkg maintainer objects here
> within 48 hours that Ian should proceed with his update?
May you stop in the next hour giving executive advice when you're not
representing anybody whatsoever?
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Just for future reference, it'd probably be better to run more than 5
> > tests of each population in the future
>
> Getting larger data sets will be rather time-consuming -- especially
> for
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> ... and in a "do what i say, not what i do" fashion, the default sa-exim
> setup (at least in etch) leads to receiving bounce notification because
> of spam being rejected.
What *is* valid in the context of this thread is the following policy:
IF the r
On Wed March 5 2008 13:30:06 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
> >> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my vie
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> Please post the URL for this policy. I apologize if you've already
> posted and I missed it, but Google couldn't find it for me.
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage
Now I would appreciate if you could stop spreading lies and aggressive
remarks in th
On Wed March 5 2008 14:52:04 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Please post the URL for this policy. I apologize if you've already
> > posted and I missed it, but Google couldn't find it for me.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage
Hi Raphael,
I had alre
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:48:57PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> > > into the "hardening" svn
28 matches
Mail list logo
