Re: Bug#466342: ITP: gmyth -- library for accessing MythTV backends

2008-02-18 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Montag, den 18.02.2008, 00:57 -0600 schrieb Mario Limonciello: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: gmyth > Version : 0.7.0 > Upstream Author : > Alexsandro Jose Virginio dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > H

RFH: users/developers with Canadian Multilingual keyboards

2008-02-18 Thread Christian Perrier
To properly deal with #464799 which requests support for Canadian Multilingual keymap (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#Canadian_Multilingual_Standard) in the installer (and therefore in console-data), I need someone with the knowledge of such keyboard/keymap to test the console keymap

Re: RFH: users/developers with Canadian Multilingual keyboards

2008-02-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 18, 2008 4:24 PM, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please CC the BTS to comments if they're related to the bug's solution > or followup in -devel for general comments. Asking on the ubuntu-ca list might yeild some useful info: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu

Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:20:12PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package > since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not > been acknowledged yet. The current package is two major versions out of > date (1.0 vs

Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:15 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:20:12PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > > > The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package > > since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not > > been acknowledge

Bug#466368: ITP: cwm -- general-purpose data processor for the semantic web

2008-02-18 Thread Noah Slater
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: cwm Version : 1.2.0a2 Upstream Author : Yosi Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm * License : W3C Programming Lang: Python Descripti

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and with > no objection, probably during the week. > Do we really need a mass bug filing for every single lintian check out there? I don't think this achieves an

Re: How to express bullet lists

2008-02-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Simon Huggins wrote: So doing this on the Packages file from amd64 in unstable currently there are list problems in the following dd-list'd packages. I think mostly they could easily just be s/^ / / on the affected lines though sipcalc is interesting in that it uses two le

Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version

2008-02-18 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:41:34 -0600 Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >gammu The problem with this is that there are stable versions, for which I use watch file and are uploaded to unstable. Testing versions I put (usually) to experimental and I

Re: How to express bullet lists

2008-02-18 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi Andreas, On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:14:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Simon Huggins wrote: > >http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description > >The others are probably bugs then. Do you have a list to name and > >shame? > Ahh- shame on my

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and > > with > > no objection, probably during the week. > > > Do we really need a mass bug filing for every sin

Bug#466400: ITP: libnet-upnp-perl -- Perl extensions for UPnP

2008-02-18 Thread Mario Limonciello
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libnet-upnp-perl Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : Satoshi Konno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : skonno/Net-UPnP-1.2.1/ * License : Written by owner Programming Lang: Pe

Re: Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

2008-02-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Miles Bader necel.com> writes: > Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes: > > Differently put, why do you think that NOT having current versions > > of a popular library, here wxwidgets in version 2.8, is a feature > > and not a bug? > > I don't. I'm just questioning the (apparent) assertion tha

Re: Intend to hijack rrdtool

2008-02-18 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
> Do you prefer your git, or the Debian SVN or maybe git.debian.org? I think using alioth's services would be the best way to go. We'd prefer git, but svn is fine, too. What's your favourite? I'd offer to spend the time to merge your and our work. As the old packaging never had a copyright

Bug#466433: ITP: dkfilter -- implements domainKeys message signing and verification

2008-02-18 Thread Thomas GOIRAND
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: dkfilter Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Jason Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://jason.long.name/dkfilter/ * License : GPL v2 Programming Lang: Perl Description

Re: Bug#466433: ITP: dkfilter -- implements domainKeys message signing and verification

2008-02-18 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar, 2008-02-19 at 02:20 +0800, Thomas GOIRAND wrote: > As Yahoo! requests DomainKeys to be implemented for sending mail to > them, it's quite urgent that this package reaches SID asap to allow > people to be able to send email to Yahoo! You mean that without this sending mail from a postfix to

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-18 Thread Gunnar Wolf
ARAKI Yasuhiro dijo [Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 07:53:06PM +0900]: > Hi all, > I am a member of debian mirror administration team in Japan. > > I announce I start cdn.debian.net. > > At 2008-Feb-05, we had started "cdn.debian.org" on global Debian Mirrors. > > This CDN checks your hosts DNS query to

Possible MBF: perl 5.10 and the "remove empty /usr/lib/perl5 dir" bug

2008-02-18 Thread Niko Tyni
[crossposted to debian-{devel,[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Summary: around 400 *-perl packages have a debian/rules bug that makes them FTBFS with perl 5.10, currently in experimental. Until recently, the most common build system in Perl CPAN modules, ExtUtils::MakeMak

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said: > More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless > rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check. [...] > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and with > no objection, probably

Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already prepared an upload for this. It should hopefully go > sometime today. Great; thanks for taking it off my DDPO page. ;-) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/c

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-18 Thread Yasuhiro Araki
Hi, On 2/19/08, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, thanks for implementing a great idea :) This might be specially > useful for laptop users who often connect from different countries :) > The implementation also gives me some strange results: From my > workstation, in the 132.248. cl

Re: Intend to hijack rrdtool

2008-02-18 Thread Alexander Wirt
Bernd Zeimetz schrieb am Monday, den 18. February 2008: > > > Do you prefer your git, or the Debian SVN or maybe git.debian.org? > > I think using alioth's services would be the best way to go. We'd prefer > git, but svn is fine, too. What's your favourite? I'm against a move. It took me som

Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Your guess is as good as mine. I've asked and didn't get any answer. As > near as I can tell, they all really like hacking on GNU Backgammon, but > none of them like doing release management. (Some of them use Windows and >

Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Ack, what about only reporting (thus in a non automated way) on those >> which are not affected by any repackaging/similar version part? > > It's might be acceptable but I'm not sure either. Some packages have > development

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stephen Gran wrote: >> (also, linitan.d.o seems down at the moment, but that's another issue). > That's because lintian.d.o's lintian package was upgraded and the archive > (i386+source) is being checked. And also I screwed up something with the new

Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:41:34 -0600 > Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>gammu > > The problem with this is that there are stable versions, for which I > use watch file and are uploaded to unstable. Testing

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >> > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and >> > with no objection, probably during the week. >> > >> Do we really need a mas

Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's

2008-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said: >> More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless >> rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check. > > [...] > >> If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and >

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-18 Thread ARAKI Yasuhiro
Hi, On 2/17/08, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This CDN checks your hosts DNS query to retrive your national location. > - If your located country has Debian Mirror, return this mirror site IP address. > - If your located continent has Debian Mirror, return this mirror site I

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, On 2/11/08, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hi there, > > > > I'm working for about a month to remove all the old bits of gnome 1.x > > from Debian for lenny. There was about 40 packages

Re: Debian mirror CDN had launched.

2008-02-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* ARAKI Yasuhiro: > Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation? Sorry if I sound like a broken record. What kind of software do you use? Is this just DNS-Balance plus a handful of scripts? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I'm working on this programs (to porting to gtk2): > Sergio Rua: gmanedit (ready 80%) > Marcela Tiznado:gtkgo (ready 70%) > Aurelien Labrosse: xwine (ready 70%) > chbg (libgno

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Anibal Avelar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi. I'm working on this programs (to porting to gtk2): > > > > Sergio Rua: gmanedit (ready 80%) Please also correct the debian/changelog encoding in that package. I could

Re: [DSE-Dev] New version of refpolicy headed towards incoming

2008-02-18 Thread Václav Ovsík
Hi, a bit late reply, sorry... On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:28:21PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > With this version of the (surprisingly lintian clean) reference > policy uploaded, all the SELinux packages, apart from setools, are now > at the latest released versions (in Sid,