Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Now that the library transition is over, and all major bugs should be
fixed, I've been able to finally orphan the directfb suite of packages.
It might make sense for whoever takes over, to adopt the whole suite
(directfb, dfb++ and fusionsound), they have been maint
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:01:47PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> if we choose the binNMU needed packages way,
> virtualbox-ose binNMU will become useless in case of a 1.5.4-dfsg-5
> upload is pending.
Yes, I got confused by this email talking about a new version and
binNMUs.
Michael
--
Michael Me
On 11293 March 1977, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> somewhere else etc. to map key fingerprints to Debian accounts. Add
> @debian.org
> and you get an email address (let's not care about people disabling
> it).
ANY "solution" *HAS* to care about this, there is no way you can sanely
think that [EMAIL P
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [I'm forewarding this to debian-devel because this seems to be the
> right list for this kind of issues.]
>
> Short intro for debian-devel: We are discussion about including GT.M,
> a free MUMPS implementation available at
> http://sourceforge.n
On 11293 March 1977, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Lets jump in here, even if not all points address your mail only.
> If by "disfavour" you imply that it's intentional that NEW packages
> aren't built before being accepted, I think you're wrong. I think it
> would require not completely trivial chang
El lunes, 11 de febrero de 2008, Bernd Zeimetz escribió:
> Heya,
>
> after so many positive responses we've decided to upload rrdtool today,
> also not to loose time as it has to go trough NEW. It is team-maintained
> and living in a git repository now.
>
> Maintainer: Debian RRDtool Team <[EMAIL P
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Early March 2008
> Very soft freeze
[...]
> Mid of July 2008
> Full freeze
I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
2.6.24.x. If that is so, then I kindly request that the debian kernel
packages
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:07:10 -0600 William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WP> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:55 +0100, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
WP> > And, seeing from your signature that you're both a Debian and Ubuntu
WP> > developer, I'd like to notice that Ubuntu doesn't seem to find
WP> > anything
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:55 +0100, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> And, seeing from your signature that you're both a Debian and Ubuntu
> developer, I'd like to notice that Ubuntu doesn't seem to find
> anything
> catastrophic with shipping wx2.8 which it does since quite some time.
So Ubuntu ships w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libpoe-component-server-simplehttpd-perl
Version : 1.40
Upstream Author : Apocalypse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP/
* L
Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if you appreciate using Debian as a development platform, the fact
> that CodeBlocks can't be built on it is IMHO a pretty critical
> problem.
Why?
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneat
[for some previous context please see the thread starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00520.html]
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:19:27 -0800 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Currently, the packages that are asking for wx2.8 are almost all available
> and releasable in earlier versions, buil
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> echo() { /bin/echo "$@" }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+"$@"}; }
I believe you mean.
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above,
Le February 12, 2008 03:19:47 am Joerg Jaspert, vous avez écrit :
> On 11293 March 1977, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
>
> Lets jump in here, even if not all points address your mail only.
>
> > If by "disfavour" you imply that it's intentional that NEW packages
> > aren't built before being accepted,
Hi,
I've uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-6 to experimental. It adds support for TLS
extensions. This changes some structs in the public header files
causing ABI changes. I believe those are harmless and shouldn't cause
any problems. But I'd like some people to test it before I upload this
to unstable.
On 2008-02-10, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D465028 - libqt3-mt: Miss=
> ing=20
> weak symbols for stat64 functions
>
> basically, in qt3 3:3.3.7-9 and earlier, libqt3-mt seems to provide some=20
> symbols:
>
> $ objdump -T libqt-mt.so.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:38:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > My IIDC cameras do not work correctly with a juju-enabled libdc1394
> > 2.0.1. Furthermore, apart from coriander there are no applications that
> > have migrated from libdc1394 v1 to v2.
>
> even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
>
Hi Guillem,
Otavio Salvador, Luis Mondesi and me would like to adopt directfb and friends.
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 465369 -1
reassign -1 goplay
retitle -1 goplay: Please avoid "Debian" in short description
severity -1 minor
thanks
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:01:58AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>Quoting Jonas Smedegaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Package: wnp
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:54:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-6 to experimental. It adds support for TLS
> extensions. This changes some structs in the public header files
> causing ABI changes. I believe those are harmless and shouldn't cause
> any problems. But
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 05 février 2008 à 13:27 +0100, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > Policy says I should ask here before I add -fPIC to dialog.
> >
> > So: May I build libdialog using -fPIC?
> >
> > My idea is to do this now, document which packages
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> > Early March 2008
> > Very soft freeze
> [...]
> > Mid of July 2008
> > Full freeze
>
> I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
> > 2.6.24.x. If that is so, then I kindly request that the debian kernel
> > packages will be released with the stable Firewire stack modules
> > compiled.
>
>
Hi Walter,
sorry for not answering last year.
I'm not completely MIA just terribly slow and very very low profile. I
still intend to update the Debian aegis package.
Sorry again for being unresponsive,
Christian
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 12:38 +0100, Walter Franzini wrote
[Andreas Tille]
> Any idea how to solve this problem? Any volunteers to package GT.M?
What about providing the generated files in the initial upload? The
files can them be used to bootstrap the system on the autobuilders.
The initial upload can't build-depend on itself, but when it is built,
th
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Any serious objection to that?
no, fine by me.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
[ stripping cc list to relevant bug report + devel for general info ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> Given the pace of kernel releases, I do not believe 2.6.26 is possible
> for lenny, but 2.6.
27 matches
Mail list logo
