On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:02:40 +0100, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I slightly disagree. Not that I have doubts about your commitment, but
> this entire discussion showed that SELinux is, right now, not ready
> for being included in default installs. As D-I is preparing a beta
> rele
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:00AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:00:52 +, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Tue Feb 05 00:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > If we can't figure out a good and clean way to keep a large stack
> >> > of long-lived patches
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:43:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I don't think Lenny is in shape for a release either. It took
> me about a day to get most SELinux packages back up to date -- which
> means we could have them updated anytmime in the last few months, if
> any one had
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > If nobody has any objections, i'll follow Frans' advice and file a bug
> > against dpkg-dev.
>
> Yes, makes sense. I've just fixed it in dpkg's git [0].
Except it will only work if the package uses 'Package-Type' and not
'X*-Package-Type'. We should m
Dear,
We released KNOPPIX5.1.1 for Trusted Computing Geeks (v1.0).
http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/index-en.html
It includes trusted computing software based on TPM(Trusted Platform
Module). Debian packages on KNOPPIX is validated by Remote Attestation.
OpenPlatformTrustServices is includ
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:10:19 +0100, Václav Ovsík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:43:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I don't think Lenny is in shape for a release either. It took me
>> about a day to get most SELinux packages back up to date -- which
>> means we could
Hi,
in the past months I've tryied to contact Christian Meder
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) without success. He is the maintainer of
the aegis packages.
His last upload for aegis is dated 2006-05-14 and in the meantime the
upstream team has done two stable updates and the release of the next
major version
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:34:58AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>..
> Well, don't bother with the SELinux packages; most of them are
> already in Incoming, though I am not packaging straight out of SVN yet.
> I'm sticking to the released versions, until I can see a clear need to
> go
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Hilko Bengen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Description : Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages
>
> I suggest "s/Debian/.deb"
>
> That would prevent derivative distributions to embark something that
> is less meaningful for them.
I
On Thu Feb 07 22:42, Ben Finney wrote:
> In the scenario Manoj presents above, the modifications applied to
> upstream are easily available all in one place: the foo.diff.gz.
But all as one patch, not as your nice separated list of commits and/or
branches.
> Whereas with a patch bundle system,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:00AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Why should I bring my feature branches into a patch system, when
> > there is no need to? As far as the end user or NMUer is ocnerned, they
> > do apt-get source foo, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/08 22:45, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Alberto Garcia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[snip]
>>
>> Also, if a user doesn't know what GTK+ is, he/she probably won't
>> expect a radio player being non-graphical ...
>>
>> There are very few non-graphi
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:49:20PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> but currently willing to work on i'd nack fjp requests.
> of course if no progress has been made in a month,
> his request is more then reasonable.
I disagree that simply willingness can nack Frans' request.
If the current situat
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:34:11PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:49:20PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > but currently willing to work on i'd nack fjp requests.
> > of course if no progress has been made in a month,
> > his request is more then reasonable.
>
> I
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:00:41PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I disagree that simply willingness can nack Frans' request.
> > If the current situation is "bad", and I assume that trusting Frans'
> > words, and it has been like that for long, then the request should be
> > fulfilled now. La
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:38:07PM +1000, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
I've been trying to contact Daniel Glassey, the last-listed maintainer
of the Bibledit Debian package. This package has fallen significantly
behind the development of Bibledit. Daniel h
Quoting Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: !
>
> * Package name : libjs-prototype
> Version: 1.6.0.2
> Upstream Author: Sam Stephenson
> * URL: http://www.prototypejs.org/
> * License: MIT-style license
Quoting Hilko Bengen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I just had a look at what the other kids are doing:
>
> dpkg: package maintenance system for Debian
> dpkg-dev: package building tools for Debian
> apt: Advanced front-end for dpkg
> This is Debian's next generation front-end for the dpkg package
>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > dpkg: package maintenance system for Debian
> > dpkg-dev: package building tools for Debian
> > apt: Advanced front-end for dpkg
> > This is Debian's next generation front-end for the dpkg package
> > manager. [...]
>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:19:05AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 2:58 AM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Sorry if I have broken protocol by taking this off list. I am interested in
> > using 2.8,
> > truecrypt relies upon this.
>
> No problem, though others might
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:26:52PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Bah that's the worst reason I ever seen to not use a DVCS in Debian.
> Please look at the debian packages with patches, and please tell me how
> many come with a comment about what the patch do. Please start with the
> glibc if yo
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, we sort of managed to get our debian/changelog entries more
> readable due to social pressure, if we standardize on a patch exchange
> format which mandates a description in the header, we can probably
> continously improve the description of patch
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe your reasoning is faulty, because it is based on incomplete
> information. There was more than one "BSD" license in use well before
> USB's Office of Technology Licensing withdrew the 4-clause version.
[snip]
While this is very interestin
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> Am I missing something?
> This ?
> http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
> http://web.archive.org/web/20001205083200/http://www.debian.org/m
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:14:09PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> Some of the USB devices I have, are missing in lsusb list, this ussue
>> is in Testing and Unstable.
>> In Ubuntu Linux and Debian Etch all my devices are listed.
>
> I suspect that there is some problem with udev (assuming
Rafael wrote:
Package: general
Severity: normal
Some of the USB devices I have, are missing in lsusb list, this ussue is in Testing and
Unstable.
In Ubuntu Linux and Debian Etch all my devices are listed.
I suspect that there is some problem with udev (assuming that you have done your
tests
Package: general
Severity: normal
Some of the USB devices I have, are missing in lsusb list, this ussue is in
Testing and
Unstable.
In Ubuntu Linux and Debian Etch all my devices are listed.
I have done some tests:
I start Debian.
I run lsusb and i see my three USB devices listed: scanner, mode
Hi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:38:07PM +1000, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> I've been trying to contact Daniel Glassey, the last-listed maintainer
> of the Bibledit Debian package. This package has fallen significantly
> behind the development of Bibledit. Daniel has not answered my emails,
>
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 10:23:51 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Except it will only work if the package uses 'Package-Type' and not
> 'X*-Package-Type'.
X*B*-Package-Type should work as well.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libjs-scriptaculous
Version: 1.8.1
Upstream Author: Thomas Fuchs
* URL: http://script.aculo.us/
* License: MIT-style license
Description: is a user inte
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Being
>> something not really end user-oriented, that would have to be a
>> "hidden" task (not shown as a choice by tasksel) that one could choose
>> with the appropriate D-I boot option.
>
> Hmmm, why hidden? In how far are other tasks more or less u
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:07:00 +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> > * script (but svn-centric):
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-perl/scripts/dpatch2quilt?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
> The script should (IMHO) make sure QUILT_PATCHES is set correctly.
> (Cc'ing dmn because of this)
Good catch, thanks!
F
On Thursday 07 February 2008 11:07:00 pm Sven Mueller wrote:
> However, I wonder wether quilt has any way (through a known wrapper
> perhaps) to support the thing I like (though I'm not too attached to
> that feature) with dpatch:
> Being able to keep only debian/* in the repository along with the
Thanks, Manoj, for this powerful 'comeback'.
Looks like you've updated most of the packages already; at least the
non-GUI ones (which are the ones I care most about, I never really got
the hang of the UI apps).
Don't forget we'll also (AFAIK) need updates to PAM and OpenSSH.
These two are very impo
On Feb 7, 2008 8:52 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for being naive but why these ones ? Who is Bastian Kleineidam
He is a DD, so I chose his packages over wxwidget's on the assumption
that he is more familiar with packaging. Feel free to try the other one and
decide if obe sui
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, I could have sworn that the DFSG predated the Constitution and hence
> predated the existence of the three-clause BSD license. UCB dropped the
> advertising clause in July of 1999 and the D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: !
* Package name : libjs-prototype
Version: 1.6.0.2
Upstream Author: Sam Stephenson
* URL: http://www.prototypejs.org/
* License: MIT-style license
Description: is a JavaScript Framework
that aims to ease development
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:49:37PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:14:09PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >> Some of the USB devices I have, are missing in lsusb list, this ussue
> >> is in Testing and Unstable.
> >> In Ubuntu Linux and Debian Etch all my devices are l
gregor herrmann schrieb:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:09:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> Is there any easy conversion from dpatch to quilt for a given package
>> that is using dpatch?
>
> The following two links might give an idea:
> * manual conversion:
>
> http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/08/c
x-post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - fup2 where it fits best (I read all lists) -
probably debian-sgml
Hello,
There is an item I have on my TODO list for some time now regarding the
way dh_installxmlcatalogs works. ATM package maintainers have to
manually write t
>
> Check these out http://www.nursinghealthcareagency.com <---
> Business Opportunity
>
> --
> () ()
> (o.o )
> (>/\<)o
> () ()
> (^.^)
> (oo)o
>
> --
> http://www.detectiveunlimited.com | http://www.nursinghealthcareagency.com
>
>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:45:42AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Saying that something is GTK-based is probably meaningful for the
> average geek. It means nothing for the average user. This is what I
> call jargon.
>
> Our package descriptions should help all users to answer the simple
> que
[You didn't honor my M-F-T so I guess this will continue to go to both
lists.]
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:29:29PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I believe your reasoning is faulty, because it is based on incomplete
> > information. There was more
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [You didn't honor my M-F-T so I guess this will continue to go to both
> lists.]
Indeed.
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:29:29PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The version in /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is very specifically the
>> UCB version,
> A m
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 300 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 92 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > dh-make: tool that converts source archives into Debian package source
> > > dh-make-perl: Create Debian packages from perl modules
>
> > Well, them doing this does not necessarily mean they are right.
>
> .debs are commonly referred to as "Debia
Quoting Alberto Garcia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So we have:
>
> "A small GTK+-based client for the Last.fm online radio"
> "A GTK+-based client for the Last.fm online radio"
> "A small client for the Last.fm online radio"
I'd go for the second choice (you half-convinced me, guys)without
the l
47 matches
Mail list logo
