Quoting Yves-Alexis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> * Package name: ktsuss
> Version : 1.2
> Upstream Author : David B. Cortarello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/ktsuss
> * L
Hi,
Bernd Zeimetz:
> as rrdtool is a vital part of a lot of system monitoring solutions and
> should not go into Lenny in its current unmaintained state, I intend to
> hijack it.
>
Do it.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was sele
On Wed Feb 06 12:09, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Again, the discussion isn't (for me) about a tool, but an exchange
> > format. We are discussing having patches served in a quilt series, and
>
> okay, this appro
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Again, the discussion isn't (for me) about a tool, but an exchange
> format. We are discussing having patches served in a quilt series, and
okay, this approach is similar but different. So you want a quilt
series, but
> The priority of selinux packages was changed from optional to standard,
> fairly shortly before the release of Etch.
>
> I propose to revert that change before Lenny. The basic reason is that
> the selinux packages have basically been unmaintained since the release
> of Etch.
I'd like to work
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:27:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> I'd like to work on SELinux packages and bugs.
That's wonderful, thanks for your help offering!
Still, if I'm interpreting correctly Frans' and Erich's mails, the
*current* status of SELinux in Debian is, erm, sub-optimal. So I
Michal Čihař wrote:
> This server was the place where I tried the lookup and it is really in
> Czech. It has own DNS server which does not use any proxy and I flushed
> it's cache before each attempt. Just tested it again to be sure:
[snip]
> Okay let's try it also another way - ask directly your
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:14:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > I find personnaly patch/unpatch more easy to understand, but YMMV...
>
> I think (hope) that no one will be able to find a reason why the two
> target should *n
Il giorno Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:27:45 +0100
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > The priority of selinux packages was changed from optional to standard,
> > fairly shortly before the release of Etch.
> >
> > I propose to revert that change before Lenny. The basic reason is that
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:56:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Description : A GTK+-based Last.fm client
>
> "Last.fm" isn't really clear for anybody. I suggest using a more
> generic description and somehow say this is related to audio/media
> playing.
Well, you're right, I should
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > So please go for patch/unpatch.
>
> An unpatch target might be problematic. There're packages with patches
> that touch the upstream Makefile, and calling 'make unpatch' before
> 'make clean' can break things; of course the clean ta
Hi,
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
[Please follow up to -legal only. Full quote for the benefit of -legal.]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
Hi,
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must r
On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> software must display the following acknowledgement:
> This product includes software developed at the University of
> Tennessee, Knoxville, Innovative Computing Laboratories.
Hi Jean!
You wrote:
> I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
> following statements:
> --
> 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:46:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> > software must display the following acknowledgement:
> > This product includes software developed at t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: alfresco
Version: 2.1
Upstream Author: Alfresco Software, Inc.
URL: http://www.alfresco.com/
License: GPL with FLOSS exception
Description: Alfresco is an open source enter
This one time, at band camp, Cyril Brulebois said:
> On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> > software must display the following acknowledgement:
> > This product includes software developed at the University of
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdebian-package-make-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : myself
* URL or Web page : not published yet
* License : GPL2+
Description : Perl extension for autobuilding Debian pa
[setting MFT to avoid OT discussion on -mirror]
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> PD. What do you think about adding a built-in list of addresses which 'work'
> for OpenDNS so they are excluded and some kind of http redirection is used
> instead?
It's a possibility, but I had envisioned something simpler
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:59:30AM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > Also drop the leading article, of course
> > "graphical GTK+-based client for Last.fm media service"
>
> Is it necessary to say it's graphical provided that it's based on
> GTK+?
>
> How about ...
>
> "Graphical GTK+-based clie
Hi,
I'm not DD, but I'm very interested into SELinux on Debian (but must to
say - not a guru for SELinux yet :).
I'm experimenting with latest SELinux code on Etch, so if this staff can
be worth for anyone...
http://linux.i.cz/debian/dists/selinux-etch/
Packages are a bit hairy (changelogs). I r
On 06/02/2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Just to make this clear […]
Yep, thank you (all) for clarifying that, sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpFkxYGMPJdq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: opencascade
Version: 6.2.0
Author: Open Cascade SAS (OCC), a French software services company
URL: http://www.opencascade.org/
License: Open CASCADE Technology Public License, includes triangle with
non-free source
Description: CAE platform library a
Hello,
I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
lintian reports that udebs don't allow the Homepage field in
debian/control.
If I got it right, the Homepage field belongs to the Source section of
d
Jonas Meurer wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
lintian reports that udebs don't allow the Homepage field in
debian/control.
If I got it right, the Homepage field belongs to t
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> I: cryptsetup-udeb udeb: unknown-field-in-control homepage
Quick guess: could this be a case-sensitivity issue? Should be
"Homepage:"...
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:27:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I'd like to work on SELinux packages and bugs.
>
> That's wonderful, thanks for your help offering!
>
> Still, if I'm interpreting correctly Frans' and Erich's mails, the
> *cu
On 06/02/2008 Barry deFreese wrote:
>> I: cryptsetup-udeb udeb: unknown-field-in-control homepage
>
> What version of lintian do you have? That should be fixed by now.
$ lintian -V
Lintian v1.23.43
greetings,
jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 06/02/2008 Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > I: cryptsetup-udeb udeb: unknown-field-in-control homepage
>
> Quick guess: could this be a case-sensitivity issue? Should be
> "Homepage:"...
Unfortunately not. It's already 'Homepage' in debian/control. lintian
inself seems to l
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
> but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
> lintian reports that udebs don't allow the Homepage field in
> debian/control.
This is what I was told by (a
Quoting Alberto Garcia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:56:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > Description : A GTK+-based Last.fm client
> >
> > "Last.fm" isn't really clear for anybody. I suggest using a more
> > generic description and somehow say this is related
Quoting Carlos Izquierdo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
>Package name: alfresco
> Version: 2.1
> Upstream Author: Alfresco Software, Inc.
> URL: http://www.alfresco.com/
> License: GPL with F
On 06/02/2008 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
> > but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
> > lintian reports that udebs don't allow the Homepage field in
> > debian/control.
>
> This is what I was told by
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > "graphical GTK+-based client for Last.fm media service"
> > Is it necessary to say it's graphical provided that it's based on
> > GTK+?
> "GTK+" is jargon..:-)
Then we'd need to change quite a few package descriptions :-)
$
Hi everyone,
There is no real "SELinux team" anymore that could say yes or no to
anything I figure. The SELinux people at Debian were mostly Manoj, RJC
and myself. I havn't heard anything from Manoj in months, I'm not able
to do any actual SELinux work anymore and while RJC updated his SELinux
Demo
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon a écrit :
>
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> software must display the following acknowledgement:
> This produ
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23:37 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 06/02/2008 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > I'm not sure whether this is an issue with dpkg or rather with lintian,
> > > but if I check the cryptsetup deb+udeb packages after building them,
> > > lintian reports that udebs don't allow th
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
> licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
> read all the copyright files to check who to acknowledge. For this
> reason, I wouldn't recommend to incl
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:44:38PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
> > licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
> > read all the copyright files t
Quoting Alberto Garcia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > > "graphical GTK+-based client for Last.fm media service"
> > > Is it necessary to say it's graphical provided that it's based on
> > > GTK+?
> > "GTK+" is jargon..:-)
>
> Then
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that it is a bit frivolous to distribute software with
> advertisment clause in main and not properly warning the redistributors,
> who are the most likely persons to infringe the clause. We should
> remeber that for other aspects of licencing a
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:00:52 +, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue Feb 05 00:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > If we can't figure out a good and clean way to keep a large stack
>> > of long-lived patches in the vcs then I firmly believe we should
>> > standardize on quilt.
>>
>
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:30:40 +0100, Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On another note, I have a slight problem with the (other) proposal of
> using a (git/$DVCS) repository as the form of source package
> distribution. Mainly because I think this will usually add
> bloat. While developing/
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think it's horribly credible that including software covered
> by the 4-clause BSD license in Debian violates the principle of
> least surprise when we specifically list it as one of our acceptable
> licenses in the DFSG.
The 4-clause BSD license
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:19:14 +0100, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The priority of selinux packages was changed from optional to
> standard, fairly shortly before the release of Etch.
> I propose to revert that change before Lenny. The basic reason is that
> the selinux packages have basic
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:27:45 +0100, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> so asking if the SELinux team is ok with adding me as co-maintainer?
> thanks Erich for your concise posting on where the work needs to be
> picked up!
The place we need most work is
1) slat
2) polgen-dfs
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:49:01 +0100, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello Frans, Hello fellow DDs, Yes, the SELinux stuff doesn't seem to
> have any currently active developers. I haven't heard anything from
> Manoj in months.
I haven't been around a whole lot, no.
> Anyway
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 4-clause BSD license is not one that we list as an acceptable
> license.
>
> DFSG http://www.debian.org/social_contract> §10:
>
> 10. Example Licenses
>
> The GPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses are examples of licenses that
> we consider fre
Quoting Hilko Bengen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libdebian-package-make-perl
> Version : 0.01
> Upstream Author : myself
> * URL or Web page : not published yet
> * License : GPL2+
>
Quoting Adam C Powell IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Package name: opencascade
> Version: 6.2.0
> Author: Open Cascade SAS (OCC), a French software services company
> URL: http://www.opencascade.org/
> License: Open CASCADE Technology Public License, includes tria
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> Am I missing something?
This ?
http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
http://web.archive.org/web/20001205083200/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Quoting maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> but currently willing to work on i'd nack fjp requests.
> of course if no progress has been made in a month,
> his request is more then reasonable.
I slightly disagree. Not that I have doubts about your commitment, but
this entire discussion sh
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Possible alternative: create a tasksel's task to include it, which
would make testing of installs with SELinux by default easier.
I would be in great favour of this.
Being
something not really end user-oriented, that would have to be a
"hidden" ta
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I raised this issue on #debian-boot (irc), and was told that the
> > concerns by "(a d-i maintainer | someone who was willing to express an
> > opinion" were correct. Frans Pop from the debian-installer team
> > verified that the Homepage field
55 matches
Mail list logo
