Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-09 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:18:16 +0100 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please note that, in the past, the login and/or passwd packages had to > conflict with such manpages-* packages because both provide manpages > such as passd.1, passwd.5, etc. > > shadow *has* Czech manpages: > e

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 20:06 -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit : > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly spell > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation. > For example GNOME is being spelt in some packages as Gnome, or simply gnome, > when its right

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:51:42AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Could you please add GLib, GObject, GTK+, GConf, GnomeVFS and GStreamer > to the list? Just to help Russ out here, but he already described how capitalisation checking currently work in lintian. To re-iterate: it does *not* check

Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:06:03PM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote: > Okay, wget did the job and managed to download sources while I was at > lunch, so I will look at this package. Anyway upload will probably not > happen until utf-8 man pages will be supported. Though it isn't official yet because some

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Sergei Golovan
TCL -> Tcl tcl -> Tcl TK -> Tk tk -> Tk -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 11:19 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > Regarding the list above I would guess that what you want is something > like the following: > > * glib -> GLib * Glib -> GLib > * gobject -> GObject * Gobject -> GObject > * gtk+ -> GTK+ * GTK -> GTK+ > * gconf ->

C++/STL linking trouble

2008-01-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I'm having trouble with a new C++ package called Salomé which I can't get to link to a C++ library in a new package OpenCASCADE. Here's the error: g++ -m64 -D_OCC64 -g -D_DEBUG_ -Wno-deprecated -Wparentheses -Wreturn-type -Wunused -o .libs/testDS testDS-testDS.o -pthread ./.libs/lib

Re: C++/STL linking trouble

2008-01-09 Thread Thomas Girard
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:07:30AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Greetings, Hello Adam, > I'm having trouble with a new C++ package called Salomé which I can't > get to link to a C++ library in a new package OpenCASCADE. > > Here's the error: [...] > Using nm -C I found that the library lib

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:33:35 +0100 Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * gnomevfs -> GnomeVFS > > * gnome-vfs -> GnomeVFS > > * GNOME VFS -> GnomeVFS > > * Gnome VFS -> GnomeVFS > > * Gnome-VFS -> GnomeVFS > > * GnomeVfs -> GnomeVFS > > * Gnome-Vfs -> GnomeVFS > > I'm not a

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Luca Capello
Hi all! On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:13:25 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 11:19 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : >> Regarding the list above I would guess that what you want is something >> like the following: > >> * gnomevfs -> GnomeVFS > * gnome-vfs -> GnomeVFS >

Re: Bug#459776: RFP: manpages-cs -- Czech manual pages

2008-01-09 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:10:19PM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:18:16 +0100 > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please note that, in the past, the login and/or passwd packages had to > > conflict with such manpages-* packages because both provide manp

ITP: libdbix-class-datetime-epoch-perl -- Automatic inflation/deflation of epoch-based DateTime objects for DBIx::Class

2008-01-09 Thread Ernesto Hernandez-Novich
Package: wnpp * Package name: libdbix-class-datetime-epoch-perl Version: 0.03 Upstream Authors: Brian Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam Paynter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch/ * License: GPL or Perl Artistic Description: DB

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Frank Küster
Maybe also something along tetex -> teTeX Tetex -> teTeX TeTeX -> teTeX (but any mention of teTeX, bless its memory, is probably a bug anyway) tex[-]*live -> TeX Live TeX[-]*live -> TeX Live TeX[-]*Live -> TeX Live and even TEX[^tT] -> TeX which may give many semi-false positives: Lots of thi

Re: C++/STL linking trouble

2008-01-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:37 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:07:30AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Greetings, > > Hello Adam, > > > I'm having trouble with a new C++ package called Salomé which I can't > > get to link to a C++ library in a new package OpenCASCADE. > >

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 13:54 +, Neil Williams a écrit : > On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:33:35 +0100 > Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not a GNOME expert, but is there any reason why a GNOME component > > capitalise differently GNOME? Historical reasons, I guess. > GnomeVFS is

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:25:17 +0100 Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 13:54 +, Neil Williams a écrit : > > GnomeVFS is used by GNOME but it does not require GNOME itself. It > > isn't a "part of GNOME" > > Erm, GnomeVFS is a key part of the GNOME platf

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-09 Thread Joe Smith
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] That's wrong, and XML-RPC *SUCKS*, as does most of the text-only interfaces, when you want real-time events. DBus isn't such a bad way to do things, it doesn't requires the daemon up and running to interact with netc

Processed: Re: Report broken package database to use

2008-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 437118 general Bug#437118: Report broken package database to use Bug reassigned from package `popularity-contest' to `general'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Re: Correct spelling/capitalisation of project names

2008-01-09 Thread Armin Berres
On Mon, 07 Jan 08 20:06, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly spell > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation. > For example GNOME is being spelt in some packages as Gnome, or simply gnome, > when its right spelling: GNOME. Other

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-09 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:33:31PM +, Joe Smith wrote: > "Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I assume that it's > >possible to write tools that directly hit your netconf server withouth > >going through the dbus daemon, making it lightweight and a

Re: C++/STL linking trouble

2008-01-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 10:09 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:37 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:07:30AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > I'm having trouble with a new C++ package called Salomé which I can't > > > get to link to a C++ library i

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-09 Thread Joe Smith
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well that wasn't what I understood, but I'm really not a D-Bus expert at all :) Though it doesn't makes sense to let the D-Bus connector be a separated component as you then only pull the library which is of a reasona

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-09 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* "Joe Smith" | The alternative is to have the control socket use the D-Bus system, | meaning only one package is needed, but messages | would need to pass through the dbus-daemon in order to be recieved. You can use point-to-point DBus connections without a daemon if you for some reason desire

Re: netconf control socket protocol: rfc822, xml-rpc, or dbus

2008-01-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.09.2229 +0100]: > > The alternative is to have the control socket use the D-Bus system, > > meaning only one package is needed, but messages > > would need to pass through the dbus-daemon in order to be recieved. > > Well that wasn't what

Mipsel is blocking wordnet migration to testing

2008-01-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I wrote a mail Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:26:12 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please compile recent version of wordnet to fix the problem that was reported by the ddpo daemon. This worked for Sparc. Any hint what I could do to tr