Hi,
On Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 01:18:27 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when writing scripts to manage Debian repository, many people
> including me use Python. Is there some "official" way of doing it? It
> seems to me everyone is writing his own parsers. I know about of at
> least 5 differen
Szia!
Szeretnél letölteni Magyarország legnagyobb letöltooldaláról? Ezen az oldalon
megtalálhatóak a legujabb, legsikeresebb filmek! A filmek divx, dvd minoségben
is megtalálhatóak! Ha pedig egy kis pornót szeretnél nézni, itt azt is
megtalálhatod, gyönyöru lányok filmeit a Szexfilmek menü al
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:18:27AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> 2) http://www.bononia.it/~zack/blog/posts/2007/07/python_debfile.html
> 3) http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/python-debian
Those 2 are actually one. python-debfile was a proposed addition to
python-debian and has since long b
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> > But the license on the package itself doesn't make that restriction.
>
> If I have understood things correctly, in England (and the rest of the
> UK?) the copyright is owned by the crown and
On Monday 29 October 2007 23:42, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ti, 2007-10-23 kello 09:44 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> > > But the license on the package itself doesn't make that
> > > restriction.
> >
> > If I have understood things correctly, in England (and
> See if http://ftp-master.debian.org/bzr/debian-archive-kit/ helps you.
This looks good, thanks!
> python-debian aims to be a bundle of Python libraries to deal with
> Debian-specific file formats. As such I would consider it to be the
> official tool (disclaimer: but I'm one of the maintainers,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:53:33PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Awesome. Maybe you could help for example the maintainer of
> git-hgbuildpackage to use python-debian, so that all the code is on
> one place.
No problem, but I won't ping him in advance via mediation :), but feel
free to tell him th
Hi all,
The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
the proper capitalization is 'Vcs-Browser', not 'VCS-Browser'.
Thanks.
Gregory Colpart (e
Hi Cyril,
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:45]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > That only helps people who look now at it and it should be (I guess it
> > will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
>
> I know, just pointing to the existing bits
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> That only helps people who look now at it and it should be (I guess it
> will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
I know, just pointing to the existing bits of documentation I know of.
> Btw, looking at Vcs-* the changelog only says:
Hi Cyril,
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:31]:
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
>
> Vcs-*.
>
> > Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
>
> There's dpkg changelog in ??
Romain Francoise schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
> the proper capitalization is 'Vcs-Browser', not 'VCS-
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
> the proper capitalization
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: phpmyvisites
Version : 2.3~b4 (2.3 beta4)
Upstream Author : phpMyVisites team
* URL : http://www.phpmyvisites.us/
* License : GPL-any
Programming Lang: PHP
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
Vcs-*.
> Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
There's dpkg changelog in “etc.”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:23:17PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
> Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
There have been documentation for XS-Vcs-* since ages in the BTS as an
addendum for the devref (#391023),
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> That only helps people who look now at it and it should be
> (I guess it will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
See #391023, it has been there since a few days after I announced the
support of Vcs-* fields in the PTS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: html5-validator
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://validator.nu/
* License : GPL3 compatible
Programming Lang: Java
Descripti
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:08:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Thanks. OK so now a few of my packages have been built after a long
> > wait, but 2.5 days later still not uploaded apparently. Are they just
> > waiting for manual p
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:31]:
> > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > > So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
> >
> > Vcs-*.
> >
> > > Is there a documentation/wiki/e
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note t
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:36:48PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Is this field meant to point at the Debian repository or the
> upstream repository? (I assume the Debian one)
Both Vcs-Browser and Vcs-* are meant to contain the current development
copy of the repository used to build the offici
22 matches
Mail list logo
