raptor.d.o down

2007-09-15 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks raptor.d.o and the other debian related guests on this system (skuld, lophos) are down. The storage for this systems died partially today and needs to be investigated on site. Bastian -- If I can have honesty, it's easier to overlook mistakes. -- Kirk, "Space Seed", sta

Re: Why no Opera?

2007-09-15 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:57:07AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >> It is not free software. I had a quick peek at the license in the .deb > >> available from Opera's website, and it would not seem that they

Bug#442366: ITP: nova-filters -- a set of high-resolution ladspa filters

2007-09-15 Thread Tim Blechmann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Blechmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: nova-filters Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Tim Blechmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : https://tim.klingt.org/nova/nova-filters * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ D

Re: Packages with RFCs deleted

2007-09-15 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2007/9/14, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This said, it does not make a big difference, apart from the packager's > time... But would I be asked to expurge one of my package, I would > probably consider moving it in non-free instead. The nice thing about the current system is that whoever w

Bug#442381: ITP: mirmon -- monitor the state of mirrors

2007-09-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: mirmon Version: 1.38-1 Upstream Author: Henk Penning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://people.cs.uu.nl/henkp/mirmon/ License: MIT Description: Mirmon helps administrators in

Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom

2007-09-15 Thread paddy
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:51:09AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:28:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > >> Which we have always allowed in software, even. It falls under the > >> "publish it with another name". > > > the requ

Re: Packages with RFCs deleted

2007-09-15 Thread paddy
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:38:38AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit a ?crit : > > > I think that shipping the non-programmatic, non-modifiable works in > non-free binary packages generated from source packages located in main > would better

Bug#442394: ITP: virtualenv -- Python virtual environment creator

2007-09-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: virtualenv Version : 0.8.1 Upstream Author : Ian Bicking * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv/ * License : MIT-style Programming Lang: Python Description :

Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom

2007-09-15 Thread Russ Allbery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Thanks, but I'm thinking more of the kinds of license that says you > *have* to publish your changes and in a specific venue. seems like a > close comparison with what has been said here about RFCs. Ah, yes, that's normally not considered DFSG-free, I believe. I had t

Re: Why no Opera?

2007-09-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> true. If somebody could convince the opera guys to open their source - >> that would be a great thing. Opera is a very well working browser and it >> is a shame, that it is not under

IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures

2007-09-15 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Hi I am trying to understand why guile 1.8.2 FTBFS on alpha architecture. The corresponding build log is at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=guile-1.8&ver=1.8.2%2B1-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1188100514&file=log I looked at the source guile-1.8-1.8.2+1/test-suite/standalone/test-round.c and th

Re: Why no Opera?

2007-09-15 Thread Ben Finney
Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do not understand why [failure to release as free software] is "a > shame". I think that the real shame is too many broken or never > finished programs under open source licenses. Whether a program is broken or never finished seems to me to be e

Re: Why no Opera?

2007-09-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:40:33 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Michael Banck wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:57:07AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> >> It is not free software. I had a quick peek at the

speed of COW directory copying: XFS 20x slower than ext3

2007-09-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I am using cowbuilder for building my packages, because the initialization takes like 10s, compared to several minutes with pbuilder on my system. A few days ago, I realized that on one of my systems, it takes 0.5s only to copy the COW directory. I became curious and wanted to know why, so I d

Re: IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures

2007-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 05:59:06PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > I am trying to understand why guile 1.8.2 FTBFS on alpha architecture. > The corresponding build log is at > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=guile-1.8&ver=1.8.2%2B1-2&arch=alpha&stamp=1188100514&file=log > I look