Robert Edmonds wrote:
> "deb-ice" is a custom Debian distribution, described in [0] and available from
> [1]. It appears to be a preseeded Debian 4.0 i386 business card ISO built
> using a web-based tool called LinuxCOE[2], and the aggregator has attempted to
> place the entire work under a licens
Hi,
I've noticed that there is: http://wiki.debian.org/LocalGroups
and added Japan to the list.
I think it would be better served if it were linked from
www.debian.org, or placed under www.debian.org. Am I missing
something?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libmath-pari-perl
Version : 2.010709
Upstream Author :Ilya Zakharevich
|* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~ilyaz/Math-Pari-2.010709/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: easyspice
Version : 0.6.7
Upstream Author : Jean-Marc Routoure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://easy-spice.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gspiceui
Version : 0.9.33
Upstream Author : Name Mike Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gspiceui
* License : GPL
Programming Lan
Hi all,
The idea (mentioned in the prior thread) of having an "Etch and a half"
release with an updated X/kernel/installer sounds EXACTLY like what I was
hinting at. Backports are great, but having a supported, Debian-tested
release that Debian can give to users with new/exotic hardware (which ha
Hi folks,
For years, the Debian pam packages have by default had a weaker password
length requirement than upstream. I can think of no reason for this to be
the case, especially when upstream doesn't support a configurable minimum
password length and Debian does.
Does anyone else have a reasoned
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cereal
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Jameson Rollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cmrg.fifthhorseman.net/wiki/cereal
*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> block 438885 with 440574
Bug#440574: memlockd postinst starts twice, doesn't use invoke-rc.d
Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Was blocked by: 341413 341415 348259 348
su, 2007-09-02 kello 12:47 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti:
> Does anyone else have a reasoned argument why Debian should have a weaker
> password length check than upstream (4 chars instead of 6)? If not, this
> will be changed in the next upload of pam.
What's the justification of not using a m
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:04:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2007-09-02 kello 12:47 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti:
> > Does anyone else have a reasoned argument why Debian should have a weaker
> > password length check than upstream (4 chars instead of 6)? If not, this
> > will be chang
When browsing debian.org, I came across something rather interesting...
http://packages.debian.org/etch-backports/
Evidently, all of the backports.org backports are now listed on the
debian.org packages listing. They are still on the backports.org servers and
not on the debian.org mirrors, but th
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:46:56PM +, Tim Hull wrote:
> When browsing debian.org, I came across something rather interesting...
>
> http://packages.debian.org/etch-backports/
see last debian-devel-announce@ mail.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:58:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> packages.debian.org was finally updated to the new code base that
> was already available some time from packages.debian.net.
great! Thanks a lot.
> Some known regressions:
>
> - While DDTP translations are used, the tran
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The upstream default of 6 has been around for at least 5 years, possibly as
> long as a decade; and the code in question is inactive when pam_unix is
> linked to cracklib, which I think most distributors other than Debian are
> do
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:38:23PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The upstream default of 6 has been around for at least 5 years, possibly as
> > long as a decade; and the code in question is inactive when pam_unix is
> > link
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 05:20:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:38:23PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > Just curious, what is the rationale for wanting to keep cracklib out of
> > base?
>
> Size and complexity. Adding libpam-cracklib to base would be a 2MB inc
http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2007-September/006695.html
The following message belongs to the thread listed above.
>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:57:24 -0400
>From: Kevin Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: co
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:03:47PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>I'll package libgssglue and change nfs-utils to depend on libgssglue.
The {build-,}dependencies of both librpcsecgss and libgssapi are:
source package librpcsecgss
depends:
nfs-common librpcsecgss3
nfs-kernel-se
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:04:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > su, 2007-09-02 kello 12:47 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti:
> > > Does anyone else have a reasoned argument why Debian should have a weaker
> > > password length che
> > Given modern processor power availability, I can't think of one;
>
> How about modern brain availability? You'll just get a lot of annoyed
> people changing it back; for example, makepasswd still uses a minimum
> length of six.
My weak English makes me think your comment is rude. Please exc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: steam-powered
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Michael Gilbert
* URL : no website
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : Valve's steam game content d
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:01:38AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> It seems you disagree, but don't really give a rationale for it except
> "some other programs we have in Debian default to 6 chars". Am I right?
>
> (BTW, this "makepasswd" doesn't seem to be isntalled by default)
And can also b
Hi Christian!
You wrote:
> I don't really understand the need for turning your comment this way,
> which indeed doesn't make your point clear, whether you agree or
> disagree with the idea of default enforcement of 8 characters length
> for passwords.
>
> It seems you disagree, but don't really
24 matches
Mail list logo
