Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: lua-logging
Version: 1.1.3
Upstream Author: Kepler Project
URL: http://keplerproject.org/lualogging
License: MIT/X
Description:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:57:28PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> [...]
> > If you want to keep the files aside but ie.
> > compressed than you should use a compressing filesystem.
> > But if you want something working on acces
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: guile-cairo
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Andy Wingo
* URL : http://home.gna.org/guile-cairo/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C, Scheme
Description : Gui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> looks pretty cool, but someone should talk to them about this:
>
> "The effect of this is that distribution-provided packages are often
> more reliable than upstream ones (since upstream don't get to hear about
> many
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Krauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xpn
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Antonio Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xpn.altervista.org/index-en.html
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: Python
D
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:07:53PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> > looks pretty cool, but someone should talk to them about this:
> >
> > "The effect of this is that distribution-provided packages are often
> > m
Hi,
following the last post I made changes to my dpkg branch to not include the
arch-specific symbols created by gcc on libraries in order to have as many
common symbols files as possible. See the current "black list" on top of
this file:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=blob;f=scripts/Dpk
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:19:02 +0200
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everything is available in the git branch:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=shortlog;h=dpkg-shlibdeps-buxy
>
> I think my work is mostly ready for unstable as it is. The last step is to
> convince Guillem Jo
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> I'd appreciate any input you can provide because dpkg-shlibdeps isn't
> particularly familiar to me and I purposely left this part of
> dpkg-cross until this stage of the rewrite.
>
> I'd like to be able to not need dpkg-shlibdeps in dpkg-cross but if t
Hello Javier,
Am 2007-08-20 23:30:26, schrieb Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
> BTW, NIST provides a very handy information called the National Software
> Reference Library (NSRL, http://www.nsrl.nist.gov/) which comes also very
> handy for either forensic analysis or setting up a baseline of know
Am 2007-08-21 11:26:26, schrieb Guus Sliepen:
> Well, it could be implemented with a FUSE daemon, that you mount over
> /usr for example, and which periodically fetches the Contents-.gz
> file from a mirror. It the uses the Contents file to generate directory
> listings. If some package tries to op
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2/ Second example, libconfig0 has a supplementary symbols
[...]
> _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ on sparc and alpha. I don't know where it comes
> from.
> Is this a internal symbols that I missed?
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binu
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:33:03PM +0200, ciol wrote:
Hello, can you provide binaries from pkgsrc current built with debian
stable?
We don't provide pkgsrc; the NetBSD people do. They put quite some time
in making sure it works on most POSIXy environments, so theoretical
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[snip]
> 2/ Second example, libconfig0 has a supplementary symbols
> _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ on sparc and alpha. I don't know where it comes
> from.
> Is this a internal symbols that I missed?
> On powerpc it has _SDA_BASE_ and _SDA2_BASE_. Same question as above.
> On amd
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 13:03:32 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
> > binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
> > I could change it to override the source stanza field.
> I have
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:52:40PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-08-21 11:26:26, schrieb Guus Sliepen:
> > Well, it could be implemented with a FUSE daemon, that you mount over
> > /usr for example, and which periodically fetches the Contents-.gz
> > file from a mirror. It the uses the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 5/ Fifth example, it looks like 64 bits ports tend to have differences in
> common
> like on libneon2.6 where various functions suffixed by "64" disappear on those
> arches (ne_get_range64, ne_set_request_body_fd64,
> ne_set_requ
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 20:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Can anyone explain me why there's randomness in symbol mangling? If I
> > compare
> > the symbols file of gnunet-qt for example I get differences like this
> > between
> > i386 and alpha:
> > @@ -67,10 +67,10 @@
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:35:31 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Will it be possible to have more than one homepage listed, comma-separated?
Because dpkg does not have any direct use for it, it's not checking for
the validity of the values. So technically, yes, you could. The question
though is, do we w
Hi!
> What you describe is not a cache and even less a _package_ cache.
>From Wikipedia:
"In computer science , a *cache* (...)is a collection of data duplicating
original values stored elsewhere or computed earlier, where the original
data is expensive to fetch (due to slow access time ) or to c
Thanks to all,
0install.net is exactly what I am looking for.
One thing is that this system is "per user".
Having something like that "per computer" would be
nice. That is, the admin sets up the computer with
_all_ packages and the user can use _all_ packages.
(Except that _not_ all packages are i
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:08:16 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Raphael - I'm in the middle of a rewrite of dpkg-cross, including the
> diversion of dpkg-shlibdeps:
> So far, pre1 is largely complete for dpkg-cross and the
> dpkg-buildpackage diversion, barring an unknown number of possible
> co
22 matches
Mail list logo
