Mike Hommey wrote:
> Surely, any license text, be it DFSG free or not, can be reformatted.
I rather not speculate on that, or on how this license might be interpreted
legally.
This is the beginning of my license.
The License Text is all text from the first "This" in the sentence above
to
Hi
Here's the latest activity in the BTS:
http://asdfasdf.debian.net/~tar/bts/
If someone can think of other interesting, useful ways to do things
with a mirrored BTS (about 23 GB of data) please send me software,
patches,
scripts to run against the data.
I'm not sure how useful lina is, but i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
with the new upload of python-qt4, it seems I have outsmarted myself. Here's an
outline of the problem:
python-qt4 contains the Python package PyQt4 (in
/usr/lib/python*/site-packages/PyQt4) with all kinds of extension modules and
some pure P
http://www.lebspy.com/
http://www.lebspy.com/forums
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> * Others have mentioned the ordering problem that puts the main license
> last. Seems that Packaging-Copyright at the top is another case of
> this problem (see you've now removed that special case name, but the
> debian/* data would still go there). "
Le dimanche 05 août 2007 à 10:12 +0200, Torsten Marek a écrit :
> python-qt4-dev does not depend on python-qt4, and the point is of course to
> make
> the build-dependencies a bit lighter. Now the problem is that __init__.py is
> in
> python-qt4, but also needed if python-qt4-dev is installed wit
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 09:16:03 +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful lina is, but it's basicallly run
> some random program against all files in Debian (binary as
> well as source packages):
> http://asdfasdf.debian.net/~tar/lina/
> Any comments?
Could you poolize the checks s
[Sam Hocevar]
>And there is more to come. The GPL version 3 is compatible with
> the CDDL, but the GPL version 2 isn???t. Which means that in the near
> future, GPLv2-only software cannot be distributed as part of a CDDL
> operating system such as Nexenta.
That's a rather delicate way of sayi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oleg Belozeorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cl-ltk
Version : 0.90
Upstream Author : Peter Herth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk
* License : LLGPL
Programming Lang: Common Lisp
Descri
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 19:17 +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
>
>I therefore would like your opinions about this proposal, its
> shortcomings, and a strategy to implement it quickly and as widely as
> possible.
This is great! One possible short
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Do you strip the "well known symbols" you've seen on each arch so that
> > > one only has to specify the other symbols?
>
> > No, becaus
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:39:11PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> Yes, but you cannot exploit the power of more than one CPU without
> multithreading.
This is wrong. Note that "multithreading" is a different concept from
spawning many processes (ie. the traditional UNIX fork() model).
/* Steinar *
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> The software uses CDK (ncurses) to handle the user
> John> interface, libxml2 to store the information, the zlib
> John> library to compress the data and the library GpgMe to
> Jo
Hi All!
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 22:39 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> Your system admins sound rather odd. Lots of software is high performance
> without ever using threads at all.
Yes, but you cannot exploit the power of more than one CPU without
multithreading. Of course it's an other que
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 17:43 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> This is wrong. Note that "multithreading" is a different concept from
> spawning many processes (ie. the traditional UNIX fork() model).
You are right, but (I think) it's not harder to write a program which is
multithread than whi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-xml-perl
Version : 2.17
Upstream Author : Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-XML/
* License : Dual GPL/Ar
Hi folks,
A new version of PAM (0.99.7.1-1) has been packaged and uploaded to
experimental. This is intended to replace 0.79-4. However, because
there have been quite a number of upstream changes, and all the
Debian-specific patches against the old one were painstakingly
re-diffed and updated by
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:02:11PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
>> This is wrong. Note that "multithreading" is a different concept from
>> spawning many processes (ie. the traditional UNIX fork() model).
> You are right, but (I think) it's not harder to write a program which is
> multithread than w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/07 10:39, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 22:39 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Your system admins sound rather odd. Lots of software is high performance
>> without ever using threads at all.
>
> Yes, but you c
Sam Hocevar wrote:
>ACK. I edited the wiki to reflect your and Zack's view which seems to
> be the preferred way.
>
>For the sake of simplicity, I interpreted "most specific" as "matches
> the fewer files". It has the drawback of possibly changing with the
> contents of the source tree, bu
* Sam Hocevar:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> It's probably better to use a separate file. If there's a syntax
>> error, you can't be sure if the file is in the old format, or if its a
>> genuine error.
>
>But the information must be in debian/copyright.
Why? I don't thi
Hi !
lintian and linda are issuing a warning when a library contains an rpath
statement. However, lintian accepts rpath being /usr/lib/package while
lindian does not do this test.
Here is the lintian warning:
8<---
Info: The b
Hi All!
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 19:55 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> This is also wrong. All threads in a program share address space, which means
> that all variables are shared by default, which means that every single
> non-local variable access has the potential of a race condition. Mul
Hi All!
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 13:08 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Are you saying that Apache 1.x only ever used 1 CPU?
I protest for multithread/process applications agains singlethread ones.
I doesn't care which paralellization is used i just want to say that
it's not too bad to write a multiX
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:34:03PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 13:08 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Are you saying that Apache 1.x only ever used 1 CPU?
>
> I protest for multithread/process applications agains singlethread ones.
>
> I doesn't care which p
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 05:11:53PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > > Do you strip the "well known symbols" you've seen on each arch so
Hi All!
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 23:07 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> Why ? Do you need 4 CPU to soak your hard drive ? There is usually one
> partition for every logs on the machine, so you don't get a lot writing
> many log files at a time. And if you're that concerned with performance,
> the
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:25:34PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> And yes, I know that the choosen method is depend on the function. But I
> think that this function is better to implement with multithread than
> multiprocess, because:
>
> 1. Reading a log message and write it to a file is highly p
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:49:12PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> Hi All!
please don't CC me, I read the list, and my M-F-T specifically ask you
not to do so[0].
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 23:07 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Why ? Do you need 4 CPU to soak your hard drive ? There is usually o
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:15:58AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:25:34PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> > And I think that the real question is that there is place in Debian for
> > a multithread/process system logging daemon (against the singlethread
> > ones) or not. An
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> To scare people away. But maybe the ability to log into mysql was
> enough. No kidding, that's a great feature of the Description, it says
> to every clever sysadmin: don't use me.
Well, I don't know if you or me or Debian will use it but Fedora is
going to switch to it a
On 11102 March 1977, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> License: GPLv2+ (/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2) | MPL | LGPLv2.1
> (/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1)
>The drawback is that the lines can now become very long, and wrapping
> them means it's no longer possible to say "first line is license list,
On Aug 05, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lintian and linda are issuing a warning when a library contains an rpath
> statement. However, lintian accepts rpath being /usr/lib/package while
> lindian does not do this test.
> Whos is right here ? lintian or linda ?
lintian.
--
ciao,
At Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:11:51 +0900,
Masahito Omote wrote:
> I intend to orphan the anthy package. Because I cannot take enough time
> to catching up anthy's release and because no one take over or become a
> co-maintainer of this package in [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll take it, b
34 matches
Mail list logo
