Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zenoss-plugins
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Christopher Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.zenoss.com/download/links
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Kedves Levélíró!
Köszönjük, hogy kéréseddel, kérdéseddel megkerested ügyfélszolgálatunkat.
Leveledet fogadtuk, 1 munkanapon belül megkezdjük a feldolgozását, és érdemi
választ adunk rá.
Előre is köszönjük a türelmed!
Üdvözlettel,
HotDog Nyeremény Ügyfélszolgálat
www.hotdog.hu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
David Verhasselt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Perhaps transforming it into a localization problem would do the
trick. This way, users would be able to set their preference on
byte-count in the same place as their preference on currency,
decimal, and am/pm
Christof Krüger wrote:
Unfortunately, computer designers, technicians etc. are not living in an
isolated world (well.. maybe some of them).
No one wants to forbid the computer people to use base 2 numbers. They
are just asked to write KiB instead of KB if they mean base 2
quantities, because the
On Friday 15 June 2007 00:46:45 Marcus Better wrote:
> It would be helpful to know how it differs from Asterisk, since Asterisk
> too supports many of the features you list.
Where Asterisk requires copyright assignment to Digium for code incorporated
in to the mainline, Codeweaver allows contribu
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:46:10PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Because we needed a name, and Kilo is a good one to use. There is no
> rule that says you can't use the word for a different meaning in a
> different context.
Which context would this be? Computer Science? Computer Engineering?
Compu
Em Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:51:39 +0200
RalfGesellensetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Am Dienstag 09 Januar 2007 08:44 schrieb Nico Golde:
> > http://www.agnula.info/ seems to be the new domain.
> > Kind regards
> > Nico
>
> Hi Nico,
>
Hi!
> thanks for the information. I cite
>
> "IMPORTANT:
Joe Smith wrote:
> Also just rembering the exact conversion factors for
> Imperial units can be a problem especially with some of the more obscure
> units.
Nope - google knows everything!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=email&rls=email&q=100+m%2Fs+in+fathoms+per+fortnight
"2 parsecs in smoots" r
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:46:10PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
Because we needed a name, and Kilo is a good one to use. There is no
rule that says you can't use the word for a different meaning in a
different context.
Which context would this be?
#include
* Ivan Jager [Fri, Jun 15 2007, 05:36:33PM]:
> How about when you buy an 80 GB disk, and you know it's 80 * 10^9 bytes,
> but your software says /home only has 79 GB and you know it means
> 79 * 10^9 bytes?
First, it would hardly say 79GB. Maybe 79.96GB which is much closer.
> Should w
Ivan Jager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I prefer SI units over imperial ones, but there are no SI units
> for information, so we're stuck using bits and bytes.
The issue isn't over the chosen unit. The issue is over the chosen
*abbreviations*. We use 'B' for byte, 'b' for bit; that's not at
On 16/06/07 at 01:19 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Review of the Etch release cycle
>
> * Quality Assurance (QA) checks on the archive were started very late in
>the cycle. They were very useful, but the timing was very unfortunate.
>We want to encourage al
12 matches
Mail list logo
