On Sun, 27 May 2007 20:53:18 +0100
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:25:50AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > After 6 years or so of setting ftp.jp.debian.org as default for
> > pbuilder, I'm finally determined that it shouldn't stay like this.
> > So I'd like
On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:42:41 +0300
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On su, 2007-05-27 at 20:06 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Unless your own mirror supports all Debian architectures, you will
> > still need a primary for emdebian-tools. Do you test build your own
> > Debian packages a
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 01:53, David Nusinow wrote:
>> The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is
>> that it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
>
> Yes, a complete redesign of the website is a herculean task, but
>
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, if I did use emdebian, I would be mirroring
> > anything I need, and would be rather upset if emdebian tools would
> > insist on clogging my network connection (which I might not
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> Yes, you simply submit a bug report with a patch, and wait for a couple
> of year for it to be applied.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=www.debian.org&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable&include=patch
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you simply submit a bug report with a patch, and wait for a couple
>> of year for it to be applied.
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=www
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:49 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 19:43, Joey Hess wrote:
> > d-i uses the following hack to figure out where to download udebs from
> > when building installation media:
>
> Note that this can result in multiple sources. If you want only one, this
> hack
Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (copy sent to
debian-med). We (the members of the pkg-emboss project on Alioth) have
uploaded a new package in the experimental section of Debian,
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:14:46AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> 1. Change the Makefile and/or debian/rules as necessary to add -g to the
> compilation options.
Most already do that.
> 2. In debian/rules, comment out the instruction to strip the binaries
> (such as dh_strip).
No, use the enviro
Vincent Fourmond dijo [Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:29AM +0200]:
> Hello dear debian Ruby developpers !
>
> If you are interested in having a ruby section (after all, we make
> up nearly half of the interpreter section) and if you didn't do it
> yet, please second the proposal for the creation
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:15:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
>
> I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
> policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (copy sent
> to debian-med). We (the members of the pkg-emboss project on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tmexpand
Version : 0.1.2.0
Upstream Author : John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/jed/tmexpand
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: S
Le Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:36:05AM -0700, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:15:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Dear Hwei, Uwe and John,
> >
> > I did not manage to contact you in private (see below), therefore by
> > policy 10.1 I have to move the discussion on debian-devel (
Hi,
> > After 6 years or so of setting ftp.jp.debian.org as default for
> > pbuilder, I'm finally determined that it shouldn't stay like this. So
> > I'd like to have some default guessing to happen. Preferably I don't
> > want to ask via debconf, since users should have already answered the
> >
Hi,
>
> d-i uses the following hack to figure out where to download udebs from
> when building installation media:
>
> grep '^deb[ \t]' $(SYSTEM_SOURCES_LIST) \
> |grep -v '^deb[ \t]cdrom:' \
> |grep -v
> '\(security.debian.org\|volatile.debian.\(
On 5/27/07, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I think that 'printtool' has outlived its usefullness: its database
of printers (that is actually contained in the package
'printfilters-ppd', for some strange reason) is outdated;
Have all of the printer files (especially the older ones) in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremie Corbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kaa-base
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Authors: Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freevo.org/kaa
* License
Hi all,
in the past the use of debconf notes has been discussed, and it seemed
to be general consensus that they are mostly useless (or misused), but
that there are still a couple of legitimate uses which prevent their
removal from debconf (or making them a no-op) [1]
Now I am at the point where
18 matches
Mail list logo
