Hi,
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Roland Mas wrote:
> - Subversion's new /usr/lib/subversion/hook-scripts/commit-email.pl
> script complains if you don't pass it a hostname (with "-h
> alioth.debian.org"). We've locally (and temporarily) patched that
> script, but you should really check your Subver
[Daniel Baumann]
> Just wondering... Why do you upload packages you don't want to maintain
> afterwards? I remember the same with usplash.
Because I want/need the packages and see no use in doing the packaging
privately when I can make it available for all of Debian. One thing
is getting it into
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > That far I could guess but the reasoning is flawed. Getting a
> > art.debian.org for this service is a matter of convincing DSA and I highly
> > doubt that DSA will require uglyness to accept it.
>
> It was a joke. Adjust your view of reality,
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > Should be ${source:Version}. pure-ftpd-common is
> > > arch:all.
> >
> > I changed that and uploaded new packages. Thanks for you quick help!
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4227
Hi,
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > this hasn't been discussed in a while, and i'm wondering if we could
> > come to an agreement to clarify policy on the matter.
>
> We already did and have even agreed on language, and it's just waiting f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rubypodder
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rubypodder
* License : GPL
Description : Ruby
Still get no subscribing confirmation mail.
Please see my bugreport on that problem:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420261
The bug is still open for me.
Also schrieb Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am Mon, 14 May 2007 01:01:07
+0200:
> The mechanism that allows to subscribe to
Stephen Birch:
>
> Rubypodder is a script designed to be called from cron to perform
> unattended downloads listed in a configuration file containing a set of
> ssl feeds. Rubypodder was inspired by bashpodder.
^^^
That should probably read 'RSS', I guess.
J.
--
If I had to live on a desert
On ma, 2007-05-14 at 10:51 +0200, ar wrote:
> Still get no subscribing confirmation mail.
>
> Please see my bugreport on that problem:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420261
>
> The bug is still open for me.
That bug is from April. Did you try again after Frans announced it as
On Monday 14 May 2007 10:51, ar wrote:
> Still get no subscribing confirmation mail.
Subscribing to #420261 works for me now.
> Please see my bugreport on that problem:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420261
I've replied to that BR. Please follow up to my mail you will receive
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > > Should be ${source:Version}. pure-ftpd-common is
> > > > arch:all.
> > >
> > > I changed that and uploaded new packages. Thanks for
On 10 Apr 2007, at 1:54 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Sam Hocevar mentioned on his platform that there is no Alpha machine
available for developers. As we have a few standing around in a
cellar
at work I'd be willing to
- KRYPTIVA PACKAGED MESSAGE -
PACKAGING TYPE: SIGNED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Beware that in (at least fr_FR) french, "gastro" is also a shortcut
> for "gastroenteritis" and is strongly associated with its symptoms!
> It may really hamper your success in french-speaking countries...
>
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Your case is probably better handled with a simple higher-or-equal
> > dependency.
>
> Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (>= 1.0.1-1) and (<<
> 1.0.1-2) be more correct? That way the package is still binNMU safe and
> also safe f
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I never read anywhere that you have to keep a package for a certain time
> before you file an RFA bug even if it is unusual to do this just after
> closing the ITP.
neither did i say that, nor did i wanted to implicit that. my question
was out of curiousity, not with the int
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
Beware that in (at least fr_FR) french, "gastro" is also a shortcut
for "gastroenteritis" and is strongly associated with its symptoms!
It may really hamper your success in french-speaking countries...
ditto for ca_FR
that's a very unappeti
Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or M$
refugee? Why many are choosing Ubuntu instead of Debian, and even worse,
abandon Debian in favor of Ubuntu? Why do most people consider Debian to
be user-unfriendly and server-oriented distro?
Debian developers often see "U
Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or M$
refugee? Why many are choosing Ubuntu instead of Debian, and even worse,
abandon Debian in favor of Ubuntu? Why do most people consider Debian to
be user-unfriendly and server-oriented distro?
Debian developers often see "U
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>
> >>Beware that in (at least fr_FR) french, "gastro" is also a shortcut
> >>for "gastroenteritis" and is strongly associated with its symptoms!
> >>It may really hamper your succe
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or M$
> refugee? Why many are choosing Ubuntu instead of Debian, and even
> worse, abandon Debian in favor of Ubuntu? Why do most people consider
> Debian to be u
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:22:35 +0200 (CEST)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So maybe Debian-Dinner would be better? ;-)
>
> BTW, I think we should have first something and then find an apropriate
> name for this something. It makes no sense to do endless naming discussions
> before someb
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:56:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Your case is probably better handled with a simple higher-or-equal
> > > dependency.
> >
> > Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (>= 1.0.1-1) and (<<
> > 1.0.1-2)
[Peter Tuharsky]
> Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or M$
> refugee? Why many are choosing Ubuntu instead of Debian, and even
> worse, abandon Debian in favor of Ubuntu? Why do most people consider
> Debian to be user-unfriendly and server-oriented distro?
Interest
Seg, 2007-05-14 às 17:03 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen escreveu:
> Interesting analysis, with several good points on keeping the stable
> release working with newer hardware and keeping the software selection
> relevant. But my first impression after reading your long text is
> that you are ignoring
Am 2007-05-07 13:13:59, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
> > actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Something like a monthly reminder sent
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:01:26PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> How accurate is this tool? I saw that hald-addon-cpuf (which I
>> assume is short for ...-cpufreq), more precisely in
>> "queue_delayed_work_on (delayed_work_timer_fn)" stood for a lot of
>> wakeups, so I killed it. Yet it keep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was just investigating a bug where the issue seems
that no print system is installed
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420746)
That raised the question: would it make sense to add a
virtual package like "print-system" or similar
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you have a policy of releasing more often?
I'd personally be happy to, but don't have a lot of time right now to
drive the process personally. I'm also recovering from a pretty nasty bug
that took out my weekend. :/
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL P
Package: wnpp
Owner: Christoph Goehre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bandwidthcalc
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Christoph Goehre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.debiaan.de/~chris/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Descript
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>>> Beware that in (at least fr_FR) french, "gastro" is also a shortcut
>>> for "gastroenteritis" and is strongly associated with its symptoms!
>>> It may really hamper your success in french-speaking co
I guess I have to just ask: how useful is this?
This is really a quite trivial calculation, and many apps/websites
perform it automatically these days anyway.
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:27:01PM +0200, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Christoph Goehre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Wilfried Goesgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: citadel
Version : 7.09
Upstream Author : Citadel Project https://uncensored.citadel.org
* URL : http://www.citadel.org/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C)
Desc
A long time ago we planned for SPI to protect Debian developers from
liability connected with their development of Free Software. That never
came to fruition. With the sword-rattling going on by various patent
holders, it's a goal even more worth carrying out today.
Some of us have homes, and
This one time, at band camp, Wilfried Goesgens said:
>
> * Package name: citadel
>
> Citadel offers Versatile email services with verry low administration
> needed. It provides its own implementations of these server protocols:
> Imap, Pop3, SMTP, ManageSieve, Citadel
Thank you for packaging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> retitle 322762 /usr/doc may still exist on upgrade of old systems
Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
Changed Bug title to /usr/doc may still exist on upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/14/07 17:23, Wilfried Goesgens wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Wilfried Goesgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: citadel
> Version : 7.09
> Upstream Author : Citadel Project https://uncensored.citadel
Is a file, webpage or command that can provide a list of packages that
are part of the Debian base system? I tried searching in various places
without much luck. Any help in the right direct is appreciated.
Thanks,
-Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
hi carlos,
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 22:33 -0700, Carlos Ramirez wrote:
> Is a file, webpage or command that can provide a list of packages that
> are part of the Debian base system? I tried searching in various places
> without much luck. Any help in the right direct is appreciated.
the easiest wa
Sean,
Thanks for the info. It seems that all those would give me the info I
want. I was thinking that I would be able to get that info from the
actual build files of the Debian distribution itself, does there exists
such a beast?
I'm trying to compile a list packages that are common to 'base
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 07:33, Carlos Ramirez wrote:
> Is a file, webpage or command that can provide a list of packages that
> are part of the Debian base system? I tried searching in various places
> without much luck. Any help in the right direct is appreciated.
You could use debootstrap:
deboot
40 matches
Mail list logo