On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:08:56 +0100, Andreas Metzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Afaik there are no changes in behavior. blocks are only
>informational.
If this is true, it is a _TOTAL_ surprise for me. We need better
documentation.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No c
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:45:13 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>This all may change at some point in the future, but since that's the
>way it works now, the documentation is pretty complete.
I disagree. As "blocking bugs" are usually implemented differently, at
least a sentence as "al
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> Bug blocking only being a specialized kind of tagging is a total
> surprise for me. And I suspect that I am not the only one.
Since it's confusing to you, you're the best person to submit patches.
Don Armstrong
--
Taxes are not levied for the benefit o
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>I could not get rhythmbox to "simply" play CDs.
What didn't work? I made sure this morning that an audio CD still
plays fine here, so you might want to report a bug if it doesn't (I
"maintain" RB to some extent).
> I coul
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to replace a directory with a symlink, and the directory
> still contains files, what do you do with these files?
Indeed, symlinks colliding with existing directories should give an
error while package installation. And IMHO this could even be don
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides
> > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the
> > canonical example. I recommend eliminating
Dear Sir/Madam,
You can book your airport transfers in Europe and New Zealand easily by MolaMo
- Global Taxi Reservation System with fare comparison.
You have to click only the following link: http://www.molamo.com.
MolaMo is a continuously expanding global reservation system. The mission of
Hello all,
I have just uploaded packages for clamav 0.90rc2 to Debian experimental.
I am requesting testing and feedback about the upgrade path. Besides all
the usual new features and better detection methods, this upgrade changes
the config file format in an incompatible way - all options that w
* Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 15:54]:
> I strongly suspect the problem is the code (I copied elsewhere) that
> disables the service on upgrades and then re-enables it again after
> the upgrade is finished (hmmm seems broken just thinking about
> it).
>
> Anyway, in this case, the ser
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 10:45 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >I could not get rhythmbox to "simply" play CDs.
>
> What didn't work? I made sure this morning that an audio CD still
> plays fine here, so you might want to report a bug if it doesn't (
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> If you're not running a complete GNOME environment, it's possible that
> hal is missing. Rhythmbox seems to need it for audio CD playback. At
> least that's what bug 380503 indicates.
RB recommends gnome-volume-manager which depends on hal, but it mig
I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
Thanks!
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Hello!
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:50:02 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>> If you're not running a complete GNOME environment, it's possible
>> that hal is missing. Rhythmbox seems to need it for audio CD
>> playback. At least that's what bug 380503 indicates.
>
Hello Loïc,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:45:16AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >I could not get rhythmbox to "simply" play CDs.
>
> What didn't work? I made sure this morning that an audio CD still
> plays fine here, so you might want to report a
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
The updates have not been reactivated since the move of ftp-master.d.o AFAIK.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:48:09PM +0100, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> On Monday 11 September 2006 11:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2006, 21:22 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > > For my part, I find it pretty o
How do I identify which packages on my system are from
stable/testing/unstable/none-of-the-above?
For a single package, I use `apt-cache policy xxx'. I would like a
summary of this information that fits on a single line.
Thanks,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
SJ> For a single package, I use `apt-cache policy xxx'. I would like
SJ> a summary of this information that fits on a single line.
Probably apt-show-versions will help you.
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:01:58AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:08:56 +0100, Andreas Metzler
> >Afaik there are no changes in behavior. blocks are only
> >informational.
> If this is true, it is a _TOTAL_ surprise for me. We need better
> documentation.
IIRC it also generates
Package: wnpp
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy
Version : 2.2.1-fx+fl
Upstream Author : LeahScape, Inc. and Eric H. Jung
* URL or Web page : http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/
* License : GPL v.2
Description :
On 12/11/06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
SJ> For a single package, I use `apt-cache policy xxx'. I would like
SJ> a summary of this information that fits on a single line.
Probably apt-show-versions will help you.
Exactly what I wanted! Thanks,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:01:58 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:08:56 +0100, Andreas Metzler
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Afaik there are no changes in behavior. blocks are only
>> informational.
> If this is true, it is a _TOTAL_ surprise for me. We need bett
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Out of curiousity, what _did_ you expect the blocking tag to
> do? If there is an obvious answer to that, I can see why not having
> that behaviour would be a surprise. Since I can't come up with a
> reasonable response to "what additional
Russ Allbery wrote:
> The one thing that I really wanted to have happen and was surprised didn't
> happen was that I wanted a blocking annotation be automatically removed
> when the blocking bug was closed. (Or even better, made dormant so that
> if the other bug would reopen, the annotation would
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> I agree, if I had some ability to work on blocking bugs
Joey> again, removing them on close is probably the next thing I'd
Joey> try to do.
... and if the blocking bug is reopened?
Or what if the blocking bug is fixed in, sa
[MFT set to debian-debbugs, which is the right list to discuss this
sort of thing.]
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> I agree, if I had some ability to work on blocking bugs again,
> removing them on close is probably the next thing I'd try to do.
I personally haven't really had time to thh
> "Andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> I don't think one needs to touch inetd.conf at all (or
Andreas> any other service description) during upgrades, at least
Andreas> not as long as not changes to the service are
Andreas> necessary. I would rather r
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:19:59 -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The one thing that I really wanted to have happen and was surprised
>> didn't happen was that I wanted a blocking annotation be
>> automatically removed when the blocking bug was closed. (Or even
>>
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Out of curiousity, what _did_ you expect the blocking tag to do?
> > If there is an obvious answer to that, I can see why not having
> > that behaviour would be a surprise.
>
> The one thing that I rea
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OBAndreas> I don't think one needs to touch inetd.conf at all (or
Andreas> any other service description) during upgrades, at least
Andreas> not as long as not changes to
30 matches
Mail list logo
