Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bryan Donlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: onscripter-insani
Version : 20060724
Upstream Author : Ogapee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
insani.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nscripter.insani.org/
* License
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Ivan Dubrov wrote:
> * Package name: subversive
> Description : The Subversive is a Eclipse plug-in that provides
> Subversion support
Out of curiosity, is this incompatible with subclipse?
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10 SIN
20 GO TO ROBOT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyspi
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Zack Cerza, Chris Lee and Lawrence Lim (C) Red Hat
* URL : http://gnome.org/projects/dogtail
* License : LGPL
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dogtail
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Ed Rousseau and Zack Cerza
* URL : http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
I'd like to receive comments about:
- shipping /etc/networks in netbase
- adding 169.254.0.0 to it
- Forwarded message from Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: base-files: please
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 11:35:59AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Ivan Dubrov wrote:
> > * Package name: subversive
> > Description : The Subversive is a Eclipse plug-in that provides
> > Subversion support
>
> Out of curiosity, is this incompatible with subclipse?
>
Thomas Perl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:42:16 +0200 George Danchev wrote:
>> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:33, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>> > If they can't be used with the exact same commandline, there's no
>> > sense in providing these virtual packages becaus
Hi Ted,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:32:19PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > There are good chances that Etch will contain 2.6.18, but due to some
> > open bugs the Release Candidate 1 of the installer has still 2.6.17.
> Because of t
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:28:18AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 02:06:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Could we have something like this after release:
> > [...tracking unique I
Dear Debian Developers,
we are working on a distributed apt-cacher for local networks
implemented in Python. We call it apt-zeroconf since we use avahi for
automatically finding other apt-zeroconf instances on the LAN, similar
to Apple's Rendezvous/Bonjour/Zeroconf technology.
It is still in an e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Bedogni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: screenkast
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Bram Biesbrouck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/screenkast
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Bedogni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libinstrudeo
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Bram Biesbrouck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libinstrudeo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Compatibility is not the question. It is clearly inferior. For one, it
> has no support for JavaHL. At least everything I can find on the
> upstream web site indicates that it only supports JavaSVN. Anyhow, what
> this means is that the only way
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libgeo-helmerttransform-perl
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : Chris Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Geo-HelmertTransform/
* License :
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix
> > > features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an
> > > issue?
> >
> >
>
Hello,
Regarding the discusion about POSIX and sh I have a grave problem.
My scripts (or better programs) are using #!/bin/bash because I use
BASH specific extensions.
You say: "BASH must not be a Depends: since it is Essential."
Oops my $USERS complain about it, since they have removed this hu
Am 2006-11-13 12:03:28, schrieb David Weinehall:
> The SuSv3 is to be considered as POSIX these days, so it's available for
> free (and even packaged in Debian...)
>
> PS: The equality operator is =.
Ah thanks, and the is only "==" bashism?
...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
I h
Hi Wouter and *,
Am 2006-11-17 14:06:17, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> However, etch will install popcon by default, which also tracks unique
Hey cool.
> submitters. While this will be voluntary (people can decline to install
> popcon fairly easily), it will give us a fair approximation of the
> n
Am 2006-11-17 07:06:33, schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> A few minutes ago, we crossed over the 300,000 mark.
>
> That's 300,000 different IP addresses that have checked for any updated
> software in Fedora Core 6.
In 24 days!
If an ISP assign your ADSL account with an IP which expires
all 24 hou
Franz Pletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Configuration
> -
>
> Yes, there is a little configuration, despite the name, but only
> because the user needs to be aware that he is actually using it and
> that the daemon has to be running when performing
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> ...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
[...]
Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the discusion about POSIX and sh I have a grave problem.
> My scripts (or better programs) are using #!/bin/bash because I use
> BASH specific extensions.
> You say: "BASH must not be a Depends: since it is Essential."
> Oops my $USERS comp
On 11/18/06 10:50:30PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Regarding the discusion about POSIX and sh I have a grave problem.
>
> My scripts (or better programs) are using #!/bin/bash because I use
> BASH specific extensions.
>
> You say: "BASH must not be a Depends: since it is Essentia
Am 2006-11-19 19:13:22, schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > ...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
Oh, I think never on non-free :-/
> Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Syst
Neil Wilson wrote:
> What's an upstream issue? Consideration for next version or something?
| |
| | <-- xen-tools (Steve Kemp)
| |
| | ^
|T| | upstream
|h| |
|e|
| | |
|R| | flow
|i| v
|v|
|e| |
|r| | downstream
| | v
| |
| | <-- Debi
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to receive comments about:
> - shipping /etc/networks in netbase
> - adding 169.254.0.0 to it
The second makes sense to me. Why would moving it to base-files make
sense, though? I thought the theory was that a system without any network
interf
On Nov 19, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to receive comments about:
> > - shipping /etc/networks in netbase
> > - adding 169.254.0.0 to it
> The second makes sense to me.
I am not sure. For a start, I would need to add *all* /24 in the
link-local networks space since /etc/ne
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:07:03PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Why don't you install a line like
>
> >e.g. deb http://127.0.0.1:1618/debian main contrib non-free
>
> in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, and be done with it? That's what I'd call
> zero config.
>
> You would have to convince apt t
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > ...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
> [...]
> Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
Uhm, no?
susv3:
Installed: 6.1
Candidate: 6.1
Version table:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Compatibility is not the question. It is clearly inferior. For one, it
> > has no support for JavaHL. At least everything I can find on the
> > upstream web site indicates that it o
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 19, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'd like to receive comments about:
>> > - shipping /etc/networks in netbase
>> > - adding 169.254.0.0 to it
>> The second makes sense to me.
> I am not sure. For a start, I would need to add *all*
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:43 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > > Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix
> > > > features of echo and test;
On Sun November 19 2006 14:03, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:43 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > > > Well, the goal was (in part) to ca
On 11/19/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
gah, im blind today, so I accepted azureus. It should have been a
reject, as you now will lose the orig tarball. dak bug, sorry.
Simple fix for you: Upload a new one, ie slightly changing upstreams
version number.
Sorry for that, but da
A company kindly donated 10 Cobalt RaQ2s [1] for Debian development.
These machines are based on a 250 MHz MIPS CPU. While they're not
terribly fast compared to modern systems, they are nice entry level
systems for people who want to learn more about the MIPS architecture
and Debian's MIPS port.
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 14:53 -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sun November 19 2006 14:03, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:43 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andrea
On Sun November 19 2006 15:05, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 14:53 -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Sun November 19 2006 14:03, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:43 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Thomas Bus
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 15:47 -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > Posix puts grep, ls, kill, test, and echo all in *exactly the same
> > category*. So why does posh treat them so differently?
>
> In the case of ls, because the author "cannot think of a legitimate
> reason for anyone to use ls in a shell
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 09:05:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 19, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I'd like to receive comments about:
> > > - shipping /etc/networks in netbase
> > > - adding 169.254.0.0 to it
> > The second makes sense to me.
> I am not sure. For a start,
On Sun November 19 2006 15:59, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 15:47 -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > Posix puts grep, ls, kill, test, and echo all in *exactly the
> > > same category*. So why does posh treat them so differently?
> >
> > In the case of ls, because the author "cann
40 matches
Mail list logo
