On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I intend to package this module which would be a successor of
> python-psycopgda
>
> * Package name: python-psycopgda2
> Version : 2.0.2
> Upstream Author : Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[..]
> Note: If th
On Jul 12, 2006 at 21:52, Art Edwards praised the llamas by saying:
> I posted the same initial message on the three sites I thought were
> appropriate. My plea for honesty was a measure of frustration with
> what should be well-established packages. It turns out that in the newer
> distros, the st
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:13PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Some examples and test files are licensed under Mozilla-sample-code.
>
> Uh, is that actually a license?
Yes it is:
BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK
Version: Mozilla-sample-code 1.0
Copyright (c) 2002 Netscape Commu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maxime ROBACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xsudoku
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Maxime ROBACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://candide.homeunix.com/xsudoku/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:46:51PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> Joerg clearly stands that:
>
> 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> be called "scripts":
>
> """ GPL §3 requires the "scripts for compilation" to be provided but
> as a first note, it is unclear w
Hello Hamish,
On Thu, 13.07.2006 at 09:03:15 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't upstream intend to package it himself? Please contact him to
> check his plans.
ok, I missed, and will check, that, but was deluded into thinking he
wouldn't because he is also not the mainta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oliver Korff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tourney-manager
Version : 2006-06-15
Upstream Author : Holger Ruckdeschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hoicher.de/hoichess/tourney_manager/index.html
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gzrt
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Aaron M. Renn
* URL : http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/hacking/gzrt/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : gzip recover
Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> Joerg clearly stands that:
>
> 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> be called "scripts":
>
> """ GPL §3 requires the "scripts for compilation" to be provided but
> as a first note, it is unclear whether Makefiles may be
Il giorno gio, 13/07/2006 alle 09.09 +0200, Toni Mueller ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, 13.07.2006 at 09:03:15 +1000, Hamish Moffatt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wouldn't upstream intend to package it himself? Please contact him
> to check his plans.
>
> ok, I missed, and will check, that, but was d
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-13 15:54]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gzrt
> Version : 0.4
> Upstream Author : Aaron M. Renn
> * URL : http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/hacking/gzrt/
> * Licen
On 7/12/06, Thierry Chatelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please answer only to the list the mail is originating.
Agreed. Cross posting is bad form.
On top, I am
wondering why we have so many ' tell the truth mail lately.
Dan Brown started it!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excuse me for chiming in, but I think many places simply look
> for the best performance and productivity/dollar(euro). We do use the PGI
> compiler,
> mostly because gnu had not had a f90-f95 compiler, and partly because
> of, maybe, a 10% improvement in
[Martin Wuertele]
> > Please install cpio 2.5 or higher to facilitate recovery from
> > damaged gzipped tarballs.
>
> No need to mension it in the description, that's what dependencies
> are for.
Presumably he intends to merely Recommend cpio, in which case it's
entirely appropriate to explain
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> > Joerg clearly stands that:
> >
> > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> > be called "scripts":
> >
> > """ GPL §3 requires the "scripts for compilation" to be pro
On Jul 13, 2006 at 16:06, Erast Benson praised the llamas by saying:
>
> I don't want to insist on (1) too. But I must agree with Joerg that it
> is unclear if Makefiles could be called as "scripts for compilation".
>
> Makefiles are programs written in non-scripting language. To understand
> wha
On 07/13/06 08:06:19AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> > > Joerg clearly stands that:
> > >
> > > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> > > be called "scripts":
> > >
https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=pages&continue=http%3A%2F%2Fpages.google.com%3A80%2F
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:29:03 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:33:28PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:22:56PM -0700,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:06:19AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> > > Joerg clearly stands that:
> > >
> > > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> > > be called "scri
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
>> > Joerg clearly stands that:
>> >
>> > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
>> > be called "scripts":
>> >
>> > """ GPL
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 16:43 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> >> > Joerg clearly stands that:
> >> >
> >> > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear
On Thursday 13 July 2006 18:54, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 16:43 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > >> Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> > >> > Joerg clearly stands that:
> > >
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The specific example used was some spam source sitting in the same /27
> netblock in a colo server room, and getting through the graylister because
> a proper MTA from the same /27 netblock had already been added to the
> "approve it, it do
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:51:26 +0200
Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> np - is there a status page somewhere for the Debian boxes, so next
> time ppl could look it up themselves?
>
> I would volunteer to make one, but I'm no DD...
We might need a status page for the status page box ...
ed wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:51:26 +0200
> Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > np - is there a status page somewhere for the Debian boxes, so next
> > time ppl could look it up themselves?
> >
> > I would volunteer to make one, but I'm no DD...
>
> We might need a status page
On Jul 13, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably he intends to merely Recommend cpio, in which case it's
> entirely appropriate to explain why in the description.
README.Debian maybe, but not in the description...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: general
Severity: normal
I couldn't figure out what package "w" belongs to, hence general.
"w" is reporting some messages on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.
2.4+ kernel w/o ELF notes? -- report this
05:57:38 up 18 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.04
USER TTY FROM LO
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
> On Jul 13, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Presumably he intends to merely Recommend cpio, in which case it's
>> entirely appropriate to explain why in the description.
> README.Debian maybe, but not in the description...
The package desc
* Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-13 16:48]:
> [Martin Wuertele]
> > > Please install cpio 2.5 or higher to facilitate recovery from
> > > damaged gzipped tarballs.
> >
> > No need to mension it in the description, that's what dependencies
> > are for.
>
> Presumably he intends to
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:59:33AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I couldn't figure out what package "w" belongs to, hence general.
> "w" is reporting some messages on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.
Where does /etc/alternatives/w point to in your system?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 4
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:59:33AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I couldn't figure out what package "w" belongs to, hence general.
> "w" is reporting some messages on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.
cassarossa:~> ls -l /usr/bin/w
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-06-04 11:39 /usr/bin/w -> /etc/alternat
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> If it's not obvious to someone then that person is either
> (a) dishonest or (b) astonishingly out of touch with reality.
That would seem to be an accurate description of some certain author of
some certain rather popular CD-writing to
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:06:19AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Erast Benson writes ("Re: cdrtools"):
> > > Joerg clearly stands that:
> > >
> > > 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> > > be called "scri
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 06:49:52PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Last time I checked (and it was after Gerv's post), the relicensing changes
> > were still not applied to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Nicolas François" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sudoku
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Michael Kennett
* URL : http://www.laurasia.com.au/sudoku/
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: C
Description
* Martin Wuertele [Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:24:38 +0200]:
> > > > Please install cpio 2.5 or higher to facilitate recovery from
> > > > damaged gzipped tarballs.
> No need to mension it at all (skipping woody):
^^
Hopefully it == "the version" :) As Henning, I
Hi This is sameer working in software devision in MIC Electronics.We are devoloping a project in LINUX with GLADE and using MY-SQL as back-end. 1) I compiled GLADE application using ---> make ---> makeinstall --- > ./filename and i got output for all the programs.
2) Later i have written a prog
Hi This is sameer working in software devision in MIC Electronics.We are devoloping a project in LINUX with GLADE and using MY-SQL as back-end. 1) I compiled GLADE application using ---> make ---> makeinstall --- > ./filename and i got output for all the programs.
2) Later i have written a prog
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 322 (new: 20)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 81 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
39 matches
Mail list logo
