* Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 10:33]:
> Does anybody know if the lib3ds maintainer, Marcelo Magallon (email
> mmagallo), is still active?
He has been busy with RL lately but things got better recently.
Signing your messages to him with GPG helps him filter it out from all
the spam
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does anybody know if the lib3ds maintainer, Marcelo Magallon (email
>> mmagallo), is still active?
>
> He has been busy with RL lately but things got better recently.
> Signing your messages to him with GPG helps him filter it out from all
> the spam
* Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-08 17:32]:
> Er, does that imply that my (non-signed) message likely ended up in the
> bit-bucket...?
Problably not. I sent him non-signed mail in the past and got
replies.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello,
some groups of packages in Debian share introductory pieces in the
package description. For example, most pike packages have this:
Pike is an interpreted, object-oriented, dynamic programming language
with a syntax similar to C. It includes many powerful data types and
a module system
la, 2006-07-08 kello 12:40 +0200, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
> some groups of packages in Debian share introductory pieces in the
> package description. For example, most pike packages have this:
I tend to like them, if they're concise and at the end of the
description. They save me from having to lo
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:40:57PM +0200, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many thanks to the KDE developers for removing the similar blurb that
> they used to have. They did it nicely, and in a way that others could
> follow.
... which is... ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:40:57PM +0200, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Many thanks to the KDE developers for removing the similar blurb that
> > they used to have. They did it nicely, and in a way that others could
> >
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:52:57PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2006-07-08 kello 12:40 +0200, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
> > some groups of packages in Debian share introductory pieces in the
> > package description. For example, most pike packages have this:
> I tend to like them, if they're co
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> For example, the pike blurb could be summarised with something like:
>
> Pike is an interpreted, object-oriented, dynamic programming language
> with a syntax similar to C. To learn more about pike, see the package
> pike7.6 or
reopen 368674
reassign 368674 fuse-utils
thanks
Hi,
>It works today. Now I remember I installed fuse-utils yesterday, which
>means the fuse group did not still exist when udev started. Restarting
>udev (or rebooting the system, obviously) fixes the issue.
>This behavior seems like the only one p
On 7/8/06, Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been writing to the list about two applications that
are so broken on the AMD64 distribution that they render the
box pretty useless.
Did you send bugreports for those programs?
Btw, what is the appropriate severity level for a package tha
I have been writing to the list about two applications that
are so broken on the AMD64 distribution that they render the
box pretty useless. I'm sure one could say that two measly
applications are no big deal. However, if you do scientific computation
for a living, and two of the primary tools are
On 7/8/06, Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been writing to the list about two applications thatare so broken on the AMD64 distribution that they render thebox pretty useless. I'm sure one could say that two measlyapplications are no big deal. However, if you do scientific computation
Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been writing to the list about two applications that are so
> broken on the AMD64 distribution that they render the box pretty
> useless.
From the look of things, we are talking about a single bug in a single
library. So the system is hardly "usel
Art Edwards wrote:
Unless such core pieces as the debugging tool (ddd) and the data display tool
(xmgrace) are working, it is dishonest to pretend that the 64-bit version
is ready for testing.
ddd and grace are in Debian testing (etch) amd64 and work fine. So where
exactly is the issue?
W
Jimmy Tang wrote:
At the risk of imposing what we do at our work place onto your work
flow, i find that users generally should have access to better
debuggers/profilers than what ships with standard gnu distros.
Well, if you intend to start a flame war on the lists... but enough on that.
p
Hi,
On 7/8/06, Oliver Rother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the risk of imposing what we do at our work place onto your work
> flow, i find that users generally should have access to better
> debuggers/profilers than what ships with standard gnu distros.
Well, if you intend to start a flame w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Art Edwards wrote:
> Unless such core pieces as the debugging tool (ddd) and the data
display tool
> (xmgrace) are working, it is dishonest to pretend that the 64-bit version
> is ready for testing.
It seems your expectations for our "testing" distribu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: oss-compat
* URL : http://aybabtu.com/rmh/deb/
* License : GPL
Description : OSS compatibility package
This package ensures that OSS support is provided in some way. On Linux,
On Jul 08, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've confirmed that this really requires restart of udev after fuse install.
No, nothing requires restarting udevd.
The problem is that for performance reasons udevd resolves users and
groups only when loading the rules files. Since the rule
Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> 1. If you #include a header directly, you have to depend on that
> package.
[...]
> 4. If you #include a header that doesn't belong to *any* package
> (including the source package you're currently building), that's just
> outright evi
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:21:09PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 08, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've confirmed that this really requires restart of udev after fuse install.
> No, nothing requires restarting udevd.
>
> The problem is that for performance reasons udevd re
Hi,
I've been worried about this small bug where hwclock waits for timeout in while
booting,
with a message:
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out.
The machine is a MacBook, and I see references to this message on
dual-core Intel processors, so it looks like a generic problem.
Hi,
MD, Please fix.
regards,
junichi
At 8 Jul 2006 16:27:28 -,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at viper2.netfort.gr.jp.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry i
Le Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:09:56AM -0600, Art Edwards a écrit :
> It would be very nice if you, and other distro's, were
> to put appropriate caveats on the websites, saying that 64-bit is really not
> ready for the prime-time desktop. That way, we could make better purchasing
> decisions.
Dea
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has been brought up. Basically I don't think people were
> opposed to it, but there was noone available to implement it.
There were people opposed to it, in fact.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This has been brought up. Basically I don't think people were
> > opposed to it, but there was noone available to implement it.
>
> There were people opposed to it, in fact.
What were their argu
27 matches
Mail list logo
