新しいサイトの紹介です。遊びに来 て下さい♪

2006-03-29 Thread 浦島 桃太郎
突然のメールで失礼致します。GAME REVIEWです。 3月10日にあたらしく開設したサイト「GAME REVI EW」です。主にTVゲームのレビューを掲載しています。 また、ダイエットやクレジットカードなど、様々なサイトへの リンクも繋げておりますので、TVゲームに興味をお持ちでな い方も、よろしければご覧下さい。 http://www11.ocn.ne.jp/~tms55/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: First AMD64 Binary Uploaded

2006-03-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:48:35AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:56:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: Emphasize teams, not packages

2006-03-29 Thread Thomas Hood
Jérôme Warnier wrote: > But [packaging] is not my main contribution to Debian, I propose patches and > close bugs for many packages I personally use or need for customers, and > this is not recognized currently as sufficient for becoming a DD... and > I'm not the only one. and later wrote: > So, h

Re: Maintainers Guide

2006-03-29 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:51:30PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: >> Only for some pretty strange values of "worthless". AFAIU the only >> legal effect of the notice requirements you cite is as defined by >> subsection (d): if a compliant notice is

Re: Bug#358695: ITP: latex-utils -- utilities for LaTeX/xfig

2006-03-29 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Package name : latex-compile > Description : easy compiling of complexe (and simple) LaTeX documents > This package provides several tools that aim to simplify the > compilation of LaTeX documents : I'm marginally unhappy with the word "compile" h

Re: Bug#358695: ITP: latex-utils -- utilities for LaTeX/xfig

2006-03-29 Thread Frank Küster
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scripsit Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Package name : latex-compile >> Description : easy compiling of complexe (and simple) LaTeX documents >> This package provides several tools that aim to simplify the >> compilation of LaTeX documents

Re: Bug#359759: ITP: ispman -- ISP Control Panel

2006-03-29 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:08 -0500, Tim Peeler wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Tim Peeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: ispman > Version : 1.3 > Upstream Author : Armand A. Verstappen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://ispman.net/ > *

Re: Bug#358695: ITP: latex-utils -- utilities for LaTeX/xfig

2006-03-29 Thread Vincent Danjean
Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Package name : latex-compile >> Description : easy compiling of complexe (and simple) LaTeX documents >> This package provides several tools that aim to simplify the >> compilation of LaTeX documents : > > I'm marginall

Re: Emphasize teams, not packages

2006-03-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:11, Thomas Hood wrote: > Obviously you can't, currently. This is not true. The NM team and the DAMs have a certain amount of freedom to tailor the NM process to individual applicants. The "Tasks and skills" part of [1] currently explicitly lists "either documentati

Re: Emphasize teams, not packages

2006-03-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:08, Frans Pop wrote: > The "Tasks and skills" part of [1] currently explicitly lists "either > documentation and internationalisation or package maintenance" as tasks > for which an applicant can be tested, so not only package maintenance. Forgot the link: [1] http://

Re: Emphasize teams, not packages

2006-03-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Jerome Warnier] > BTW, how could I apply for becoming DD with only doing sysadmin > tasks? I'd do it immediately. That's my job, I'm pretty good at it, > and I prefer that to packaging, while I'm able to package too (I > already have a package of mine in Debian). I have not confirmed that this

Some packages need a new maintainer

2006-03-29 Thread Florian Ernst
Greetings, due to ongoing personal difficulties I need to downsize my involvement a bit. The following packages are up for adoption, if you want them please just take them; if nobody steps forward within a week I will file an RFA for each of them and finally orphan as per DevRef 5.9.4 three weeks

Re: Some packages need a new maintainer

2006-03-29 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi Florian! * Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060329 20:00]: > hexedit - view and edit files in hexadecimal or in ASCII I use that very often, so I'll take it. > ht - Viewer/editor/analyser (mostly) for executables And I use that from time to time, so

Bug#359955: ITP: gaim-libnotify -- display notification bubbles in gaim

2006-03-29 Thread Marco Cabizza
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Marco Cabizza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: gaim-libnotify Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Duarte Enriques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gaim-libnotify.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : displa

atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Michael Martinez
Might want to consider adding the following patch to the distribution: http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/ I wrote an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] don't know if that's the right email for him. -- Regards, Michael Martinez Engineering Manager Tech Computer Center (TCC), Speare Room 128 New Me

Re: removal of svenl from the project

2006-03-29 Thread Hector Oron
I don't follow this list often.. so you'd have to excuse me. But i read this subject, and i have to tell that i meet Svenl at debconf5 and always i have needed him he has been there. He is a really great/good guy.So i just want to tell, i did not like this subject, topic or thread at all. My suppor

Re: atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:39 -0700, Michael Martinez wrote: > Might want to consider adding the following patch to the distribution: > > http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/ > > I wrote an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] don't know if that's the right > email for him. Wouldn't "but you gotta keep th

Atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Michael Martinez
Debian packages atftp. You may wish to incorporate the following patch into the distribution: http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/ -- Regards, Michael Martinez Engineering Manager Tech Computer Center (TCC), Speare Room 128 New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 (505) 835-5388 [E

Re: atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Michael Martinez
Looking at http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines, I don't see a conflict. "but you gotta keep the copyright - unchanged - with it" is just a paraphrase of the BSD license. Regards, Michael Martinez Engineering Manager Tech Computer Center (TCC), Speare Room 128 New Mexico Tech, 801

Re: atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Michael Martinez 2006-03-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Might want to consider adding the following patch to the distribution: > > http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/ > > I wrote an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] don't know if that's the right > email for him. The right place for requests concernin

http://www.alewalnet.com/

2006-03-29 Thread aissela
http://www.alewalnet.com/ IL VERO PORTALE DI LEUCA CAPITANERIA DI PORTO GALLIPOLI http://www.guardiacostiera.it/gallipoli/ordinanze.cfm ORDINANZA N. 05/06 ORDINANZA DELLA CAPITANERIA DI LEUCA n 05/06 --- 16/03/2006 L'obbligo di entrare a remi nelle grotte via mare e non a motore diventa anche

Re: Atftp patch

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael Martinez] > Debian packages atftp. You may wish to incorporate the following patch > into the distribution: > > http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/ Your patch looks interesting; the usual way to contact the maintainers of a specific package is to email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I'm CC'in

Re: Bug#358695: ITP: latex-utils -- utilities for LaTeX/xfig

2006-03-29 Thread Vincent Danjean
Frank Küster wrote: > Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I only have a few .sty that I cuurently install in >> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/latex-utils/ (will be latex-compile/) >> And in my postinst, I use dh_installtex > > Do you need to register "map files, new formats, and new lang

Re: idea for project machines

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > > Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was ranting about that on irc before, and was told that this is 1) > > considered to be a security risk and 2) not worth the effort. The > > additional concern I had was that an automatic solution would put less >

Re: idea for project machines

2006-03-29 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS: What do you want to port today? Oops. Got the hint :-). Ganesan -- Ganesan Rajagopal (rganesan at debian.org) | GPG Key: 1024D/5D8C12EA Web: http://employees.org/~rganesan| http://rganesan.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#357703: udev breaks syslog

2006-03-29 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:15:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote: >On Mar 28, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How about restarting syslog (or it's equivalent) after relocating the >> old /dev? glibc already has infrastructure for restarting services on >> upgrade, maybe udev ca

dh_installtex just for calling mktexlsr? (was: Bug#358695: ITP: latex-utils -- utilities for LaTeX/xfig)

2006-03-29 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, masters of dh_installtex, Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: >> Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I only have a few .sty that I cuurently install in >>> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/latex-utils/ (will be latex-compile/) >>> And in my postinst, I