On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, James Troup wrote:
> This Saturday (2006-03-25) between 13:00 - 21:00 UTC, the debian.org
> machines hosted by HP are going down due to maintenance in their cage
> on the power systems. The following machines and services are
> affected:
>
> o gluck - people.d.o, planet.d.o,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I was told unequivocally that just shipping the whole tarball
> for make, which is 1.5MB large, would not be acceptable. I ended up
I was suspecting this.
> having to create two new .orig.tar.gz files, with minimal overlap in
> contents
On 10604 March 1977, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
> to foo-non-free of foo-non-dfsg, and to just install what was removed
> from the modified tarball in main. However, the Emacs tarball is
> 18 megs big so I'm not sure ftp masters wou
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>
>> Kevin Mark wrote:
>>
>>> Hi *,
>>> I noticed on occassion on -devel and planet that folks mention in passing
>>> that "I'll be in MN in US from MAR 01 thru 05" and I'd like to have a
>>> beer and d
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:53 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> >
> >> Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi *,
> >>> I noticed on occassion on -devel and planet that folks mention in passing
> >>> that "
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> > back cover text.
> >
> > How do we proceed with these documents?
>
> The resolution which passed excludes do
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10604 March 1977, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
>> to foo-non-free of foo-non-dfsg, and to just install what was removed
>> from the modified tarball in main. However, the Emacs tarball
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyvnc2swf
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Yusuke Shinyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/
* License : GPL
Description : Pyvnc2s
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:53 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>
>>Kevin Mark wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
Kevin Mark wrote:
>Hi *,
>I noticed on occassion on -devel and planet that folks
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
Notification from NOD32
Warning: NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server found the following
infiltrations in this message:
file.zip - Win32/Mytob.Y worm - unable to clean - deleted
http://www.nod32.com
Luk Claes wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:53 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Kevin Mark wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
>
>
>
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 01:16:16PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > Jeroen Massar wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:53 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> >>> Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>
> > Ke
Howdy,
Suppose you're a debian developer with limited time each week for
Debian. You get a bug report because your package fails to build on
architecture X. When you have your 2 hour window to sit down and fix
things, you log in to one of the project machines of the appropriate
architecture, apt
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:01 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> [...] apt-get your sources, chroot into sid, and discover that
> one of the build-dependencies is missing. There's no way to debug the
> build problem: by the time you find the right address to email about
> adding the build-dependency,
Over the last 2.5 weeks I have built the complete Debian archive
on a quad-core MIPS machine donated by Broadcom using the recently
released version 4.1 of GCC. In parallel, I have done the same
on an EM64T box donated to Debian by Intel and hosted by Stephen
Frost.
The purpose of this exercise w
Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:01 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> [...] apt-get your sources, chroot into sid, and discover that
>> one of the build-dependencies is missing. There's no way to debug the
>> build problem: by the time you find the right a
Hi everybody,
on http://people.debian.org/~nomeata/xaralx/, you can find debian source
and binary (i386) packages for XaraLX[1], the recently GPL-freed vector
drawing application. The packages are there for public review of both
the program itself and the packaging work.
Please note that until Xa
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 00:22 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Create a new custom chroot with the packages preinstalled on demand.
Sounds like a use-case for combining pbuilder and cowdancer (or lvm
snapshots). No time-consuming tarball extraction, disk usage is reduced
and the original chroot
Laszlo said:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:01 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be nice if you could simply "sudo apt-get install "
> > yourself? Is it feasible to have at least some of the sid chroots
> > allow this? Alternatively, how about "sudo pbuilder login ..."?
>
> I was
19 matches
Mail list logo
