Re: Release Date Update

Le lundi 20 mars 2006 à 17:39 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit : > On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:15 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: > > > > (In case it wasn't clear, this wasn't Mark Shuttlewor*t*h posting. > > Please don't feed the troll.) >

buildd disk space and debug symbols

Hi fellow developpers, I'm considering building xulrunner with debugging symbols enabled (and putting them in a separate -dbg package), but if I recall correctly, it has been disabled from firefox and mozilla builds because of the time and disk space required (something like 2GB) that could be a b

Re: So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:54:32PM -0800, Greg Conner wrote: > PS.. For further evidence on how poor your leadership is, I refer you to > how much caos there is on your mailing lists. > > You can't keep your release managers: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg8.html

Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

> Would you be so kind to post undeted patches to these bugs? s/undeted /updated :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:53:38AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:54:32PM -0800, Greg Conner wrote: > > PS.. For further evidence on how poor your leadership is, I refer you to > > how much caos there is on your mailing lists. > > > > You can't keep your release manage

Re: So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner told this: >> It must be SCO. They have cleverly disguised themselves as BYU >> students. :-) >> >> -Roberto > > So we got caught trying to br BYU students. You guys win that > battle. Interestingly enough: ,[ http://honorcode.byu.edu/Ecclesiastical_En

Bug#358147: ITP: initng-ifiles -- Scripts for initializing and shutting down the system with Initng

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: initng-ifiles Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : The Initng Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://initng.thinktux.net/ * License : GPL Description : Scripts for init

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 12:32]: > > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? > > No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right > now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches. (Oh, and yes, they are for 2.0). -- Martin Michlm

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

Am Dienstag 21 März 2006 12:56 schrieb Martin Michlmayr: > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]: > > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is > > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on > > arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]: > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on > arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the userbase might be quite low FWIW, mozilla is pretty broken on mi

Re: shared libraries dependecy problem.

On 3/20/06, Grzegorz Bizon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > I have problem with dependecies on shared libraries in my package > (tleenx2). > Linda complains that: > W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. > (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?)

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:56:36AM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]: > > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is > > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on > > arches like

Re: shared libraries dependecy problem.

* Peter Samuelson [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:01:05 -0600]: > [Grzegorz Bizon] > > Linda complains that: > > W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. > > (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?) [snip] > The point is that you probably don't need to link to,

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]: > > Apparently they also have patches for OOo. > > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches. > I guess

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:08]: > FWIW, Thiemo's patch has been in debian's firefox for a while > (well, at least that of bugzilla #258429), and is also aaplied to > xulrunner. I can confirm that firefox in Debian works. However, what can we do to finally get this patch into

for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems to be broken with the output like: (...) *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08ced388 *** It's probably due to the new glib (GSlice) memory allocator[0], but it's an application bug. Please first check if it's reall

Bug#358176: ITP: enbd -- alternative for kernel NBD, designed for RAID over NBD

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bas van Schaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: enbd Version : 2.4.32+2.4.33pre-1 Upstream Author : Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.it.uc3m.es/ptb/nbd/ * License : GPL Description : alterna

Re: So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner told this: >> So we got caught trying to br BYU students. You guys win that >> battle. > > Interestingly enough: > > ,[ http://honorcode.byu.edu/Ecclesiastical_Endorsement.htm ] > | Requirements > | > | Wh

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:08]: > > FWIW, Thiemo's patch has been in debian's firefox for a while > > (well, at least that of bugzilla #258429), and is also aaplied to > > xulrunner. > > I can confirm that firefox in Debian work

Re: Bruce Perens hosts party at OSCON Wednesday night

Paul Hedderly wrote: > Will a new DPL be able to break through this barrier > of arrogant selfish one-up-manship? Unlikely. The problem seems mostly an unavoidable function of Debian's size. Debian's experience appears to support the earlier experience of others: that large groups differ fundame

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]: > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? I've got hold of the patches now. I'll review what I'v been sent exactly and then move this discussion over to debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org > I guess they work only with non-Java, tho

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]: > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works - > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play > > some more with it later. > > If I recall correctly, only the submitter of the bug and people > prop

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation to provide them fall

Me: > [In the hypothetical case] I write to the maintainer > of P but get no reply. After repeating this a few times I (finally!) > get a message from the P maintainer... about his having more important > things to do than deal with my patch. [...] Frans Pop: > Alternative conclusion to this saga

Re: Bug#358080: ITP: pygaim -- python plugin support for gaim

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Could you please name this gaim-python instead, to follow the convention of the other gaim plugins? Also, please make sure you read README.Debian.dev in the gaim-dev package so that you know how to use the dh_gaim helper. Thanks, Ari -BEGIN

Bug#358189: ITP: gaupol -- A subtitle editor for text-based subtitles

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: gaupol Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Osmo Salomaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://home.gna.org/gaupol/ * License : GPL Description : A subtitle editor for te

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]: > > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works - > > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play > > > some more with it later. > > > > If I recall

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]: > > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works - > > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play > > > some

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation toprovide them fall

Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some few maintainers are obnoxious and anti-helpful. All of these > have bugs which have had a patch attached to them for a long time > without mantainer comment (not even 'no, this patch doesn't work > because X'). However, not all such bugs reflec

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony DeRobertis on Tuesday 21 Mar 2006 06:34 wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Now, there was a known issue with those cards with e1000 driver upto >> kernel 2.6.11, IIRC. >> > Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 )

Re: The problem with killfiles, and other musings [Was: Re: removal of svenl from the project]

On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:24:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the > > inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will > > refrain from

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

On 3/21/06, David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 21, 2006 at 14:42, Gustavo Franco praised the llamas by saying: > > Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems > > to be broken with the output like: > > (...) > > *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:

Re: Release Date Update

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:03 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 20 Mar 2006, Ron Johnson said: > > > Well, true. I confess to northernhemisphereoentrism. > > > > Still, even though Brazil, ANZ & South Africa are down under, the > > vast bulk of the world population lives in the Northern Hemisphe

Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 12:24:12AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > I hope that my patches (#357629, #357658 > > , #357661 > > ) are proper enough:-) > > This is incomplete: not only libgcc does not provide -dcv1

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your

Re: Уникальные семинары!

ah...russian spam...translated to english:WE INVITE TO THE TWO-DAY BUSINESS- SEMINAR. .."bezopasnost' OF BUSINESS".. _ 5 and on 6 April of 2006 years. Moscow, hotel "Kosmos" _ on 5 April, 2006, _ business and criminal law - view from the side of the law-enforcement agencies * operational chec

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

Hi Gustavo, On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:42:49AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems > to be broken with the output like: > (...) > *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08ced388 *** > It's probably due to the new glib (GSl

Re: Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:52 -0800, Hex Star wrote: > ah...russian spam...translated to english: [snip] Why bother? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21:08, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:52 -0800, Hex Star wrote: > > ah...russian spam...translated to english: > > [snip] > > Why bother? Gotta maximize the propagation of spam as much as possible. It's important, after all! -- Paul Johnson Email