On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:37:12PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A new amendment has made it in to the GR _after_ the two week
> discussion deadline. If there are other people mulling proposals for
> amendments to the GR, now is the time -- if submissions keep co
Currently there are several packages which Build-Depend on netbase just to
have /etc/protocol and /etc/services available to run tests. Unfortunately,
this means that all of netbase's dependencies also need to be installed --
and because of bug #162581, pbuilder can't even block inetd from star
On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd like to propose moving those data files from netbase to base-files.
> If
No. The correct solution is to fix netbase by moving update-inetd to
each *inetd package.
But aj does not want to do this until update-inetd will have been
rew
Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 13:30, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I'd like to propose moving those data files from netbase to
> > base-files. If
>
> No. The correct solution is to fix netbase by moving update-inetd to
> each *inetd package.
>
On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're suggesting that with a move of update-inetd then netbase would
> become more like the netbase-data I was suggesting as an alternative, with
> minimal dependencies, that would be fine with me.
Yes, because only the files in /etc/ w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sickle
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Duncan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.codebunny.org/coding/sickle/
* License : BSD
Description : mail fi
Hi!
On 2/2/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to have some idea what people think I should do with the
> tests that we're hopefully going to have, eventually for lots of
> packages. Would Debian like those tests as patches in wishlist bug
> reports, in general ? That would
On 2/2/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (...)
>
> I would like to have some idea what people think I should do with the
> tests that we're hopefully going to have, eventually for lots of
> packages. Would Debian like those tests as patches in wishlist bug
> reports, in general ? That
Instead I propose that all RC bugs in PHP Group software released with
the PHP License be closed.
For the record, all previous discussions of this matter on debian-legal
have suggested that the PHP License might be non-free for everything
(including PHP), but it has never been argueed that PHP its
Hello
I have memory leak in my system, I'm currently using:
Debian Sarge, Kernel 2.6.10 and Enlightenment
My problem is that the memory (ram and swap) is always grow, my ram is
775MB and the swap is 1.5GB. After
approximate 20 days the situation of the memory is that all the ram is
i
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 20:27 +0200, gustavo halperin wrote:
> In this situation all is work very sloowlyyy.
Open a terminal, type 'top'. Check that all three numbers after
'load average:' are under one.
You will see a list of applications running, and memory usage in %.
Che
On 2/3/06, gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have memory leak in my system, I'm currently using:
> Debian Sarge, Kernel 2.6.10 and Enlightenment
> My problem is that the memory (ram and swap) is always grow, my ram is
> 775MB and the swap is 1.5GB. After
> appro
gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My problem is that the memory (ram and swap) is always grow, my ram is
> 775MB and the swap is 1.5GB. After
> approximate 20 days the situation of the memory is that all the ram is
> in use and approximate half of the swap is also
> in use. In this si
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-dsv
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/python-dsv/
* License : standard CNRI Python license
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006, Charles Fry wrote:
> Instead I propose that all RC bugs in PHP Group software released
> with the PHP License be closed.
>
> For the record, all previous discussions of this matter on
> debian-legal have suggested that the PHP License might be non-free
> for everything (includ
[Daniel Schepler]
> > If you're suggesting that with a move of update-inetd then netbase
> > would become more like the netbase-data I was suggesting as an
> > alternative, with minimal dependencies, that would be fine with me.
[Marco d'Itri]
> Yes, because only the files in /etc/ would be left
On Feb 03, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not quite what he asked. He mentioned "with minimal
> dependencies". Currently netbase provides a basic networking
The dependencies list would be much shortened too.
> I think it's useful to keep this property (and the dependencies
(Why is this being CC'd to d-d?)
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:06:32PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor
>may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission
>from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...]
>
> For example, I shoul
On Feb 03, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This clause has been examined carefully in the past and deemed ugly
> but not non-free (at least, with no serious objections)--at least in
> the "Apache", etc. cases. However, I don't think that should be extended
> to the general case; "nor m
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:44:17PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 20:27 +0200, gustavo halperin wrote:
> > In this situation all is work very sloowlyyy.
> Open a terminal, type 'top'. Check that all three numbers after
> 'load average:' are under one.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:58:34 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:37:12PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> A new amendment has made it in to the GR _after_ the two week
>> discussion deadline. If there are other people mulling proposal
21 matches
Mail list logo
