Now that a draft of GPL version 3 has been published it seems appropriate
to examine what the implications would be for current licensees of GPL'd
software. For many licensees it will have implications because the software
is licensed under the GPL with a "version option".
The text of the GPL its
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:35:19PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Christopher Martin wrote:
>
> > Therefore, no modification of the DFSG would be required after the passage
> > of the amendment, since it would have been decided by the developers that
> > there was no inconsistency.
>
> If a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Knabl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vexim
Version : 2.2.rc1
Upstream Author : Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://silverwraith.com/vexim
* License : GPL
Description : virtual mail hosting with
Hi,
> > [Junichi Uekawa]
> > > 3. support for X. Some of my packages are command-line console tools,
> > >but many are actually graphical apps. It would be a plus to have
> > >some kind of interactive/noninteractive X-based testing.
> >
> > Would xnee do the trick?
>
> Actually, I wasn't
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've checked out xnee, I've noticed that the info documentation was
> not properly installed, and provided a patch. Looked over the BTS,
> tried running, found the same error as bug 315736.
Curious of xnee, I installed it to try out too,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:26:03PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:28:40PM +0100, Stefan M?ller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a grammar developer and I started to work on Chinese. We use a
> > development system that needs utf-8 input. I managed to set up
> > everything for e
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:46:38AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > dpkg (1.10.15) unstable; urgency=low
>
> > * Fix detection of va_copy.
> > * Back out debian/rules build-arch detection. It is *not* possible *at
> > all* to detect available targets in a rules file. Period.
>
> >
Am 2006-01-17 13:28:07, schrieb Adam Borowski:
> A quick comparison of fresh unconfigured i386 chroots:
>
> 94420 woody
> 146140 sarge
> 160264 etch
> 185444 sid
>
> a +25MB increase, even though etch is nearly in sync.
>
> With standard/important packages, you simply don't install them; r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gst-fluendo-mp3
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Jan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fluendo.com/resources/fluendo_mp3.php
* License : MIT
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Michal Čihař" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-bluetooth
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Albert Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Calvin On <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://org.csail.mit.edu/pybluez/
* License : GP
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:58:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gst-fluendo-mp3
> Version : 0.10.0
> Upstream Author : Jan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > I looked at the homepage, and while this does appear useful, is it really
> > nescessary to be packaged all by itself?
> >
> > Think about a collection package; I don't think debian should be overloaded
> > with tons of single-program packages.
>
> I'm getting used to packag
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:52 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:58:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: gst-fluendo-mp3
> > Version : 0.10.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-web
Version : 0.123 (2005-01-16)
Upstream Author : Aaron Swartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://webpy.org/
* License : Affero General Public License, Version 1
Des
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Eduard Bloch
wrote:
> #include
> As said bvefore, if you activate this mode manually,
this should be an
> easy feature to add on. How do you want to configure
it?
>
> Eduard.
Hi Eduard,
I was just struck by your choice of phrase. It, in a
way, expresses
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 12:10, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) We take the patent issue seriously, and drop all MP3 support.
MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patents the MPEG
patents probably have a good basis.
Any software which is based on Frauhoffe
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:08 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 12:10, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) We take the patent issue seriously, and drop all MP3 support.
>
> MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patents the MPEG
> patents pro
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 07:49 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patents the MPEG
> > patents probably have a good basis.
> >
> > Any software which is based on Frauhoffer patents (MP3 and other similar
> > encoding sys
Russell Coker wrote:
> MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patents the MPEG
> patents probably have a good basis.
>
> Any software which is based on Frauhoffer patents (MP3 and other similar
> encoding systems) should be on an external archive.
>From a technical point of v
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 07:59 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > To get this license one must agree to a contract that forbids
> > modification and further redistribution. It's not going to happen for
> > Debian.
>
> Ok, when its not DFSG-compliant but redistributable, why not p
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> To get this license one must agree to a contract that forbids
> modification and further redistribution. It's not going to happen for
> Debian.
Ok, when its not DFSG-compliant but redistributable, why not put it in
non-free (except personal reasons like 'I don't support non-
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> Are you going to sign the contract? I'm sure not putting my signature on
> anything about MP3s.
I'm afraid I can't as a poor little NM :)
> How does Debian sign a contract anyway?
I was in a simliar situation with Real, where they wanted to have signed
a contract by a DD.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Dec 2005, at 11:15 am, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Miquel van Smoorenburg]
I tested this and it works fine. It's also a better solution, since
several packages contain directories in /var/run and ofcourse they
expect them to still exist after a
23 matches
Mail list logo
