Christopher Crammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if someone could provide me with some additional
> information related to Debian packaging. Specifically, I would like to
> know if there is a way to determine which version of Debian that a
> package belongs to?
No. Almost all pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As there is no linup anymore I plan to take over this package on my
private debian ftp.
Is there anyone who has the last source package? On snapshoot.debian.net
the relevant dir are not readable.
Regards
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could provide me with some additional
> information related to Debian packaging. Specifically, I would like to
> know if there is a way to determine which version of Debian that a
> package belongs to?
You can check if it belo
On 09/11/2005 Bob Tanner wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: python-formencode
> Version : 0.2.2
> Upstream Author : Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://formencode.sf.net
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squirrelmail-decode
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : SquirrelMail Project Team
* URL : http://www.squirrelmail.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Extra decoding rou
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > > I'm afraid I have to ask the same questi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:48:27PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 10/25/05, Olaf
> van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200,
On 11/10/05, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any chance you could get quoting right? this message is totally
> unreadable.
Maybe it's caused by lack of support for UTF-8?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xglk
Version : 0.4.11
Upstream Author : Andrew Plotkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glk/
* License : Custom (see below)
Description : an impleme
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: glkterm
Version : 0.7.8
Upstream Author : Andrew Plotkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glk/
* License : Custom (see below)
Description : an imple
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cheapglk
Version : 0.8.7
Upstream Author : Andrew Plotkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glk/
* License : Custom (see below)
Description : the mos
Hi,
> > it would be convenient if 'vmlinux' is included
> > somewhere like /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/`uname -r`/vmlinux
> > (which seems to be the case with RedHat[2]).
>
> in a separate linux-image-dbg package?
>
> $ du -h vmlinux arch/i386/boot/bzImage
> 19M vmlinux
> 884Karch/i386/
On 10-Nov-05, 05:59 (CST), Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, PSF doesn't seem to be a license, but more an acronym for "Python
> Software Foundation". after reading the Python License, i'm even not
> sure whether it is possible to license third-party software under it, as
> it seems
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:49 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've been pondering on using kernel-package to generate
> debug 'vmlinux' images which are used in tools like
> kernel crash dump analysis tools and oprofile[1].
I'm totally for a -dbg kernel package with an unstripped kernel for
OProfil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nitfol
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Evin Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archiveXinfocomXinterpretersXnitfol.html
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: glulxe
Version : 0.3.5
Upstream Author : Andrew Plotkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glulx/
* License : Custom (see below)
Description : an adve
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 22:36 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > it would be convenient if 'vmlinux' is included
> > > somewhere like /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/`uname -r`/vmlinux
> > > (which seems to be the case with RedHat[2]).
> >
> > in a separate linux-image-dbg package?
> >
> > $
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: glkloader
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Joe Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archiveXprogrammingXglkXimplementations.html
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-simpletable-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~sri/Text-SimpleTable-0.02/
* License
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 05:18, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For those playing along at home, the CDDL isn't GPL compatible, and
> OpenSolaris's libc is CDDL'ed -- so anything GPLed can't link to libc
> since that would violate 3(a) [0]. The reason GPL'ed software is okay
> for regular Solaris is th
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 13:51:57 +0100]:
> any chance you could get quoting right? this message is totally
> unreadable.
Came through just fine on my end.
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cvssuck
Version : 0.3.cvs20020108
* URL : http://cvs.m17n.org/~akr/cvssuck/
* License : BSD
Description : inefficient cvs repository grabber using cvs command
CVSsu
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:42:07PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> This is based on the contents of their copyright files. Can we please
>> stop this "The only code under the MPL is Mozilla" argument?
>
> It's not an "argument"--nobody is claiming that a
Hi Joey,
thanks for being patient with me. I promise that I'll write this up
(for debconf-devel(7) or the developer's reference or whatever you
suggest) once we've sorted this out.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does that mean I must use some hackish handmade flags that are reset
>> o
I am looking for the sheet music to the song dueling banjos from the movie
deliverance. It's for guitar. Can you tell me where I can find
it?
Frank Küster wrote:
> Because it isn't true that the previous version didn't use debconf. It
> just asked the questions totally differently and took an approach that I
> now would call flawed. But still it gave the users the impression that
> their ls-R files' permissions are managed by debconf,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
dependency.
So please do not close b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: 915resolution
Version : 0.4.7
Upstream Author : Steve Tomljenovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/download.html
* License : under public domain
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 13:32 -0800, Debian Installer a écrit :
> Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
Why is this the case ? I'm running with experimental GNOME packages; if
I upload a binary package depending on them, it will be uninstallable on
unstable systems.
I can't see the
Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
> unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
> was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
> dependency.
>
> So please do not c
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 22:02 +0100, Steffen Joeris a écrit :
> 915resolution is a tool to modify the video BIOS of the 800
> and 900 series Intel graphics chipsets. This includes the 845G,
> 855G, and 865G chipsets, as well as 915G, 915GM, and 945G chipsets.
> This modification is necessar
* Josselin Mouette [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:45:20 +0100]:
> (And don't tell me to use pbuilder, I don't have the disk space nor the
> bandwidth for it.)
Why bandwidth? Several systems exist to cache debs so they don't have
to be fetched from the net each time they're used (apt-cacher,
apt-proxy
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:40:07PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Also, with this email, I am making a formal request: I am the original author
> of DBS, the most widely used patch system available in debian. This system
> tends to want to be embedded inside each and every package that makes use of
>
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 23:00 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> * Josselin Mouette [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:45:20 +0100]:
>
> > (And don't tell me to use pbuilder, I don't have the disk space nor the
> > bandwidth for it.)
>
> Why bandwidth? Several systems exist to cache debs so they don't have
[Josselin Mouette]
> I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
> to be accepted in the past.
It's the first line of defense against people uploading things that
don't build, wasting various infrastructure resources.
Perhaps what you need is for someone to set up an au
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:43:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 23:00 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > * Josselin Mouette [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:45:20 +0100]:
> >
> > > (And don't tell me to use pbuilder, I don't have the disk space nor the
> > > bandwidth for it.)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:49:08PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Josselin Mouette]
> > I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
> > to be accepted in the past.
>
> It's the first line of defense against people uploading things that
> don't build, wasting various
Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 17:49 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> Why not get someone else that has sufficient bandwidth/diskspace to
> build it in a pbuilder and upload for you?
That's the obvious solution, but it just makes things more complicated.
I was wondering the rationale behind refu
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:45:20PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used to
> be accepted in the past.
AFAIK, this is false. Source-only uploads were never allowed in Debian.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: h
On 10469 March 1977, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
> I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used to
> be accepted in the past.
Because people then fuck up their packages even more.
No, they havent been accepted in the past.
Having lost my access to my old GPG key, I followed project procedure for
creating and validating a new one. The final step is a signed request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] That request was sent on October 3. However, my new key
is still not on the keyring.
James Troup (elmo) is the only human behind [
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:23:08PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> I see no point in trying to force my way (back) into a project that shows no
> interest in allowing me to keep participating. Therefore, I hereby resign
> from the Debian Project.
That's a pity, imho.
> My resignation orphans the
Hi,
> Unfortunately, this broke pbuilder (see #317264), and other Debian
> packages (e.g. dchroot). So this patch was (at least temporarily) removed,
> and the current behavior documented.
>
>
> We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
> * keep a Debian specific implemen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:23:08PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> I see no point in trying to force my way (back) into a project that shows no
> interest in allowing me to keep participating. Therefore, I hereby resign
> from the Debian Project.
Why are you assimilating the project to an handful
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10469 March 1977, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
>>> Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
>> I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used to
>> be accepted in the past.
>
> Because people then fuck up their packages eve
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Why is this the case ? I'm running with experimental GNOME packages; if
> I upload a binary package depending on them, it will be uninstallable on
> unstable systems.
How can you test your packages if you dont build them?
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 22:02 +0100, Steffen Joeris a écrit :
>> 915resolution is a tool to modify the video BIOS of the 800
>> and 900 series Intel graphics chipsets. This includes the 845G,
>> 855G, and 865G chipsets, as well as 915G, 915GM,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:02:22 +0100 Henning Makholm wrote:
> [I tried to crosspost this between -legal and -devel, but apparently
> it never arrived on -legal. Resending...]
Thanks.
>
> Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Don't you agree that seeing non-free or even undistributable
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:25:11 +0100 Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > That's why I consider this issue as an important one: every DebConf
> > is an event through which we get public attention and can thus
> > spread our philosophy. The message really works
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see no point in trying to force my way (back) into a project that shows no
> interest in allowing me to keep participating. Therefore, I hereby resign
> from the Debian Project.
Please, don't do that.
I agree we have problem inside of project but
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
> sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor your upload.
That's not a fix, it's a bad workaround. I was a DD. I should have
been sponsoring uploads for other people, not t
* Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 16:22]:
> Since I sent my resignation mail, I have been told that the keyring
> was updated twice after my initial request for key change. Why was my
> key not added? No reason has been presented, publically or privately.
Did you follow http://ke
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-windeco-powder
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=29935
* License : GPL
Description : A windo
(FWIW, this is probably more of a d-project thing; d-legal is more about
figuring out whether licenses are free and safe.)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:24:58AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > DebConf papers will not be distributed in main.
Why not (and "says who")? If they're worth anything at al
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:23:08PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Branden Robinson, the DPL, is aware of this organizational failure. But he
> has done nothing effective to repair it. He has suggested that another DD,
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar, has the authority to make keyring changes -- an odd
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:48:14AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 16:22]:
> > Since I sent my resignation mail, I have been told that the keyring
> > was updated twice after my initial request for key change. Why was my
> > key not added? No rea
Quoting Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
> > * keep a Debian specific implementation and tag this bug wontfix
> > * reapply the patch to fix this bug, and report bugs on the packages that
> >uses this "feature"
>
> Coul
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:26:59PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 09:48:35AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Zsync checksum files are, depending on block size, about 3% of the
> >> file size. For the full archive that means under 10G
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> FYI, a possible response might be: "we care about freeness, but we pick
> our battle, and our battle is Debian main". I care about starving children,
> but I don't donate the majority of every check to feed them: there are lots
> of
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:54:09AM -0500, Michael Vogt wrote:
> My next test was to use only the data.tar.gz of the two
> archives. Zsync will extract the gzip file then and use the tar as the
> base. With that I got:
> 8<
> Read data.tar.gz. Target 34.1%
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:07:33PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > [0] Presuming the FSF's claims about dynamic linking hold up in this
> > case, anyway.
> I consider a Debian-derived distribution a derived work of the contained
> Debian tools in more ways than "mere" dynamic linking.
That do
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:56:32PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> >And, I mean, seriously: using the threat of legal action to make people
> >remove free software from the Internet? Whose side are we on here?
> No. The threat of legal action to stop the theft of Free software. Big
> difference.
F
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:40:27PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:53:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:55:41PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > > many of Erast's responses were at best antagonistic,
> > > and at worst showed a complete
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pylib
Version : 20051109
Upstream Author : Holger Krekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://codespeak.net/py/current/doc/test.html
* License : Copyright
Description
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 203 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 92 (new: 2)
Total number of packages requeste
65 matches
Mail list logo
