Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Robert Lemmen wrote:
>> if zsync would be taught to handle .deb files as it does .gz files, and
>
> You are talking about freaking lot of metadata here, and about changing some
> key stuff to get --rsyncable compression
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> As you may know, I'm working on i386-uclibc arch. And I'm finally
> starting to build the base+build-essential packages. At this moment I
> have a list of 87 source packages (not counting these packages
> build-dep) that must be built.
>
> The que
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Vogt:
>
>> When fully supported by the archive, the diff support will be
>> completely transparent, no changes on your side necessary.
>
> When downloading the Index file, APT does not send instructions to
> bypass the proxy cache:
>
> T 212.9
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> PS: Is the index file listed in Release?
Quoting http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/Release
[...]
41c3cd8cf26c2eba317c37dfe9d0d3bf 2761295 main/binary-alpha/Packages.bz2
18680c3a635a695e01f69166daef4148 2177 main/binary-alpha/Pack
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:58:23 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That is my point - adduser will print a warning if the user already
>exists.
>
>So you need to check to make sure the user doesn't exist first, before
>attempting to add it. Or you get a stupid warning appearing when
>upgradi
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:04:02 +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I only just now (Saturday) received the message from a mailing list I
>> had sent last Tuesday. I know the message reached the mailing fine
>> since I already received replies to
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> Doesn't the 'If-Range: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:18:20 GMT' mean the proxy
> should query upstream? Also what is the time to live on the reply? And
> shouldn't the proxy always query for an update if the TTL is gone?
Indeed, I should have looked at the ngrep output more closel
Hello!
On Thu 27 Oct 2005 00:57 +0200, Brian May wrote:
> (I have seen a system that appears to run ntpdate on startup before
> the network is configured - but it hasn't bothered me enough to
> investigate why yet.)
If you're using ifplugd, this is a known (and wontfix) issue:
http://bugs.deb
[Daniel Ruoso]
> > The question is: Is there a way (I mean, already implemented) to sort
> > the packages putting the most used and less dependencies on the front
> > and showing wich packages needs to be installed before the build can
> > start?
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> No. :(
Sounds like a j
su, 2005-10-30 kello 10:37 +0100, Marc Haber kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:58:23 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >That is my point - adduser will print a warning if the user already
> >exists.
> >
> >So you need to check to make sure the user doesn't exist first, before
> >attem
Hi,
A while ago bug 90989 was submitted, it was asking to extend the
definition of source control file fields to be all (physical not
logical) multi-line. I think it makes sense as we are supposedly
using RFC822, and more given some really long and obscene fields
in packages from d-i or xorg.
As
On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote:
I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this
one, for example:
|Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7])
|by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
|id 1EVmC6-lm-8a
|for [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Adeodato [iso-8859-1] Simó wrote:
Would it be unreasonable to ask that metapackages have to be _empty_,
i.e., that all their functionality it's in their control file?
As long as you give no reasons to do so I would in deed call it
unreasonable.
Kind regards
* Andreas Tille [Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:23:20 +0100]:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Adeodato [iso-8859-1] Simó wrote:
> > Would it be unreasonable to ask that metapackages have to be _empty_,
> > i.e., that all their functionality it's in their control file?
> As long as you give no reasons to do so I wou
Hello,
Bare with me I am new to Linux, and I am not sure If this is the right
place to post this ?, This is the errors I am receiving
QPixmap: Cannot create a QPixmap when no GUI is being used
kdecore (klibloader): Warning: KLibrary:/usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4:
undefined symbol: init_kwifimanag
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: epix
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Andrew D. Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://math.holycross.edu/~ahwang/current/ePiX.html
* License : GPL
Description : c
Hello, fellow developers !
I have a couple of questions about this bug:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
pure-ftpd: Depends: pure-ftpd-common (= 1.0.19-6.0.1) but 1.0.19-6 is
to be installed
Where are these 1.0.19-6.0.1 packages are coming from ?
How can I fix this issue -
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:34:49 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this
>> one, for example:
>> |Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7])
>> |by tor
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 08:05:19PM +0100, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> Hello, fellow developers !
>
> I have a couple of questions about this bug:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> pure-ftpd: Depends: pure-ftpd-common (= 1.0.19-6.0.1) but 1.0.19-6 is
> to be installed
>
> Wh
* Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> pure-ftpd: Depends: pure-ftpd-common (= 1.0.19-6.0.1) but 1.0.19-6 is
> to be installed
>
> Where are these 1.0.19-6.0.1 packages are coming from ?
Looks like a binary-NMU.
> How can I fix this issue - just releas
Scripsit Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is the following line in debian/control too strict ?
> Depends: pure-ftpd-common (=${Source-Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}
It evidently creates problems for binary NMUs (where only the
arch-dependent packages are uploaded with an NMU revision in the
S
Title: How to help us
How to help
us
Although
our organization is based on a non-profit principle, we need money to implement
and maintain our projects. We dependent on donations by those who share our
concerns and want to help us with our work.
Please
support us with your donations. W
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:54:52AM +1100, Rob Weir said
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: alacarte
> Version : 0.8
> * Upstream Author : Travis Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.realistanew.com/projects/alacarte/
> * License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Daniel J. Milstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: stopwatch
Version : 3.4
Upstream Author : Don Libes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://expect.nist.gov/stopwatch/
* License : Public domain
Description : A vi
Hi
first , how did you get those errors? Could you tell us how can we
replicate the errors you get ? Which app ? Does it happen everytime
you follow the same process ? and perhaps pls describe your machine ,
hardware , software anything.
regards
billy
On 10/30/05, lisbeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Would it be unreasonable to ask that metapackages have to be _empty_,
> > i.e., that all their functionality it's in their control file?
>
> As long as you give no reasons to do so I would in deed call it
> unreasonable.
The principle of least surpris
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the
> Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list.
Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689)
spend six days in the vinci
27 matches
Mail list logo
