I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to
sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch
in the usual format?
Sorry, for the very basic question ;-)
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
[Robert Epprecht]
> I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to
> sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch
> in the usual format?
This was answered on the list not too long ago. Use for example
'diff -ur original yourver' to get the patch betwee
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> Why is gal0.x not being added to the archive on alpha, i386, mips, and
> mipsel? According to the buildd logs, it compiled successfully on all
> those archs over ten days ago.
>
> It was uploaded for all the other archs.
I think
su, 2005-10-02 kello 09:20 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen kirjoitti:
> [Robert Epprecht]
> > I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to
> > sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch
> > in the usual format?
>
> This was answered on the list not too l
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 02:57:43 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am I missing something here?
>
>baby:~> LANG=C sudo aptitude -t experimental install aptitude
The package is in incoming, you cannot apt it yet.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No c
On Saturday 01 October 2005 17.07, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> But your reaction proves that the name "cinelerra-cvs" is misleading.
But IMHO that's not something the Debian packager can do anything other than
write it in the description. Renaming the package would only confuse users
searching fo
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:41:45AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> I intend to rename the binary packages for mysql++ with the upload of 2.0.5.
> They've been called libsqlplus* for a while now, which isn't overly
> intuitive (I've had multiple people not realize mysql++ was packaged for
> debian, d
[Christian Perrier]
> Peter Samuelson mentioned passwd being Essential because it depends
> on passwd. This is actually right. However this dependency is just
> the consequence of bash needing the add-shell and remove-shell
> utilities...so, in the future, bash shouldn't depend on passwd
> anymore
Scripsit Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> one minor point would be "apt-get install" interpreting + and -
> appended to package names for manual conflict resolution.so "apt-get
> install ... libmysql++ ..." could have different meanings in
> different context
It wouldn't matter for a library p
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:02:59AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I am trying to help move swt-gtk into testing. The excuses [1] for
> swingwt, which depends on swt-gtk, says...
> * swingwt is waiting for swt-gtk
> * Updating swt-gtk makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on arm:
> libswing
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > one minor point would be "apt-get install" interpreting + and -
> > appended to package names for manual conflict resolution.so "apt-get
> > install ... libmysql++ ..." could have di
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 06:59:19PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Or those who screw up and add it to a non-orig .orig.tar.gz (and by that I
> >> do NOT mean a modified upstream one, I mean
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:07:51AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > But lintian is not there to warn about unfixable problems with
>
> You cannot reliably determine wether the maintainer is doing something
> stupid, or upstream is.
Su
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dpkg-buildpackage in a cvs-checkout directory with strange things in the
> parent dir, for example, because of test builds leaving weird shit on the
> parent directory + lack of coffee + typing dpkg-buildpackage instead of
> cvs-buildpackag
The build of gal0.x-0.24-2 is complete on alpha, i386, mips, and
mipsel, but has not been uploaded to the archive. Users are starting
to notice and complain. Can you please upload them ASAP? Thanks.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
>
>> I suppose so -- it'll probably take a while before the translations are
>> ready anyway. When do you think apt 0.6.41 and its related packages will
>> go in?
>
> Not until gcc-4.0 and perl are both updated in testing, which block much
> of
> the archive from being updated right now. gcc-
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The build of gal0.x-0.24-2 is complete on alpha, i386, mips, and
> mipsel, but has not been uploaded to the archive. Users are starting
> to notice and complain. Can you please upload them ASAP? Thanks.
Whoops, there's a dangling antecedent if
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the
> .orig.tz before complaining.
You keep assuming the bogus stuff ends up in the diff. It once happened to
me that it ended up on the .orig.tar.gz, but I don't recall exactly what
kind o
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> No; it should not report uncorrectible warnings.
>
> *IT* *IS* *NOT* *UNCORRECTIBLE*. If you have a good reason to, you can and
> should correct it. You are just not supposed to do it just to shut lintian
> up, use an override for that.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the
>> .orig.tz before complaining.
>
> You keep assuming the bogus stuff ends up in the diff. It once happened to
> me that it en
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]:
> > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to determine where
> >aptitude's configuration file goes, so people using sudo don't end up
> >with root-owned mode 0700 files in their home directory.
> >(Closes: #2724
Em Sáb, 2005-10-01 às 21:43 -0400, Travis Crump escreveu:
> That's the stale 0.3.3 aptitude, looks like the new one won't hit the
> archives til tomorrow[or it needs to be autobuilt]...
The dinstall run will happen in approximately 4h30, according to
http://people.debian.org/~joerg/dinstall.html =
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> No; it should not report uncorrectible warnings.
> > *IT* *IS* *NOT* *UNCORRECTIBLE*. If you have a good reason to, you can and
> > should correct it. You are just not supposed to do it
Scripsit "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]:
>> > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to
>> > determine where aptitude's configuration file goes, so
>> > people using sudo don't end up with root-owned mode 0700
>> >
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the
> >> .orig.tz before complaining.
> >
> > You keep assuming the bogus stu
Scripsit Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sure you can. Lintian could (relatively) easily check whether the
> problem is in the .orig.tar.gz before application of the Debian diff,
> and suppress the message in that case.
Better yet: Warn if
(there are CVS directories in the .diff.gz)
OR ((t
On 02-Oct-05, 09:34 (CDT), "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]:
> > > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to determine where
> > >aptitude's configuration file goes, so people using sudo don't end
> > > up
> > >
reopen 137355
retitle 137355 ITP: pcsx -- Sony PlayStation emulator
owner 137355 !
thanks bts, daisuki da yo
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pcsx
Version : 1.6f
Upstream Authors : Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Owner: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: loop-aes-modules
Version : 3.0d+3.0b+1
Upstream Author : Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.decl.org/public/loop-aes-modules
* License : GPL
Description
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> No its not my BIOS time. It appears to be a timezone 4 timezones east
> of New Zealand, GMT+16, i.e., out of this world. How about on your machine?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:anthony$ perl -nwe 'next unless /Setting the System
Clock/../System Clock set/; s/: S.*//;print' /var/log/boo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: criawips
Version : 0.0.11
Upstream Author : Sven Herzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/criawips
* License
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:37:53PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> I suppose so -- it'll probably take a while before the translations are
> >> ready anyway. When do you think apt 0.6.41 and its related packages will
> >> go in?
> > Not until gcc-4.0 and perl are both updated in testing, whi
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Criawips aims to become a full featured presentation application
> that offers the perfect platform both for small presentations
> used to explain a few things to other people and for big
> presentations used for commercial presentations.
>
> Thu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ksubtile
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Tom Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ksubtile.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : subtitle editor for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://triplehelix.org/blog/
* License : BSD
Description : cpufreq informat
--
Javier E. Perez P. (aka dvst)
GPG KeyID: 441C47B4
fingerprint = AB52 DC66 A8A3 2E93 59E4 87E0 372D 91FD 441C 47B4
Maracay - Venezuela
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> A fourth shoot was intended a couple of minutes ago on the ITA bugs. The
> ITAs were a little bit different. Since they represent existing
> packages, the mechanism used here was intended to close bugs, but
> retitling into O. ITAs are a very
37 matches
Mail list logo
