Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:52:45PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
[...]
>> >find /tmp/courier-0.47/debian/tmp -perm +u+x -type f | xargs chmod
>> >u+rwx,go+rx
[...]
>> If you change the -perm argument to
>> -perm -u+x
>> it works.
> That means something di
> > I'd counterpropose to make this optional. I very much like the
> > fact that the runlevels have no default meaning and would prefer
> > it to stay that way, although I can see the issue of LSB
> > compliance.
> Personally, I hate that it isn't a standardized way to get down to
> a minimal syst
Hi,
what exactly are you trying to do? Note that the AVR tools are also
in the debian archive, so unless you want to modify the sources
a simple "aptitude install simulavr" should be sufficient.
Otherwise, you should have a look at the Debian source package
(apt-get source --download-only simula
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:34:30PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> Hello fellow developers, I have a problem on which I need advice.
>
> Pathan is a library that implements XPath functionality in c++. It
> is available both as a separate tarball as well as bundled with the
> Berkeley DB XML sources pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: calcurse
Version : 1.0rc4
Upstream Author : Frederic Culot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://culot.org/calcurse/
* License : GPL
Description : a text-based calendar
Fredderic writes:
> But at the end of the day, a very basic runlevel 1, a fairly complete
> runlevel 5, and a means to easily configure the runlevels without losing
> any (a problem with some of the older runlevel editors I've used),
> especially losing information about what priority the service i
I have been taking a lot of interest in the Reference recently, as a
result of time on d-u and #debian, and seeing where we fall short from a
documentation point of view.
Before I get too involved however, can somebody give me a guide as to
how the Reference is looked upon from within Debian?
Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse
9.1, kde 3.2.3. I have it running, but when I try to type in Arabic script
in the right-to-left, it doesn’t appear correctly…i.e. don’t
see anything on the screen, but I see the cursor moving.
Any ideas? Thanks, and sorry for what m
On Saturday 17 September 2005 16:25, Talal Al-Azem wrote:
> Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3. I
> have it running, but when I try to type in Arabic script in the
> right-to-left, it doesn't appear correctly.i.e. don't see anything on
> the screen, but I see the c
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
The Fungi skrev:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:34:30PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> [...]
>
>>Pathan is a library that implements XPath functionality in c++. It
>>is available both as a separate tarball as well as bundled with the
>>Berkeley DB XML sources provided by Sleepycat Software. The pathan
>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 05:25:14PM +0300, Talal Al-Azem wrote:
> Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3. I have
You've already asked that question here a few days ago, and have already
gotten the answer that Debian is _not_ SuSE. If you have questions about
suse, plea
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Tomas Fasth wrote:
Well, I can and already do. But it doesn't make a difference because
pathan has been programmed to depend on the xerces source, not the
exported library interface. For example, this is how the compiler
error looks like:
I think I had to deal with this k
My apologies to all. I am new to Linux and didn't realize that a program on
Debian is different than on Suse, and I think I only E-mailed it here
because of some previous discussion about it I read on the archives or
something.
Also, I don't remember sending to the list before this, though I did
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Debian developers,
>
> Some distributions/people rebuild a lot of Debian packages from Debian
> source while making no change to the source. While this is technically
> a binNMU they seldom bother to bump the version, which lead to two debs
> file
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, it's like if you say: "sometimes we move files around packages
> but forget to add the proper replaces field; as this annoys our users,
> let's make dpkg silently overwrite moved files".
>
> Cheers,
Which is the default for stable:
% cat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: llconf
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~oku/llconf/
* License : GPL
Description : utility and libra
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:09:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 septembre 2005 à 00:33 +0200, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> > It is maybe a crazy idea, but it is the only one that work. What you
> > suggest simply doesn't work, as not+linux is a provided package, and the
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:41:43PM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I have been taking a lot of interest in the Reference recently, as a
> result of time on d-u and #debian, and seeing where we fall short from
> a documentation point of view.
Thank you for filing bug #325777. We appreciate thi
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 20:10 +0200, Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> Package: xmms
> Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Why is this sent to -devel?
Anyway, please take a look at #261001.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.
20 matches
Mail list logo
