Re: wnpp situation

2005-09-15 Thread Jari Aalto
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi David! > > About ITP's, they should be retitled to RFPs, rather than closed. That > way, other people can have a go at packaging the software. > I concur. If someone did not produce a packge withing NN days (say 3 months) after ITP, the system shoul

Re: wnpp situation

2005-09-15 Thread Christian Marillat
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote: >> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in >> debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html? > > Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recom

Re: your mail

2005-09-15 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Talal Al-Azem said: > Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3. I have > it running, but when I try to type in Arabic script in the right-to-left, it > doesn’t appear correctly…i.e. don’t see anything on the screen, but I see > the cursor mov

Bug#328434: ITP: grepmap -- Parse module map files produced by depmod

2005-09-15 Thread Colin Watson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: grepmap Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/grepmap/ * License : GPL Description

removal of support for /etc/hotplug/usb/

2005-09-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
After having been deprecated for a long time, support for map files in the /etc/hotplug/usb/ directory will be removed from the udev-hotplug subsystem. This is scheduled to happen next month, when most of the current hotplug package will be replaced by a new coldplug program which will be part of u

Re: Bug#323227: new list: debian-planet to distribute planet.debian.org postings; archive to enable searching

2005-09-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050914 10:47]: > > | Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you > > | should not make it available on the Internet? > > I think there is a difference between puttin

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:12:54PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: > > Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever) > so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync with each > other and with the host DB automaticall, so that, for example, a > useradd, usermod, or

Re: removal of support for /etc/hotplug/usb/

2005-09-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:21:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > After having been deprecated for a long time, support for map files in > the /etc/hotplug/usb/ directory will be removed from the udev-hotplug > subsystem. This is scheduled to happen next month, when most of the > current hotplug pack

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Ernestas V.
Perhaps hard/symlinking original /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow and /etc/group to chrooted environments would help? Rob Browning wrote: Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever) so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync with each other and with the host

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ernestas V.] > Perhaps hard/symlinking original /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow and > /etc/group to chrooted environments would help? Symlinks won't work. Think about what a chroot environment *is*. Hardlinks will only work if the programs that edit /etc/passwd and /etc/group overwrite them rather th

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 15, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bind mounts will work > (mount --bind /etc/passwd /mnt/sarge-chroot/etc/passwd) > but apparently don't support locking all of a file's representations, What about bind-mounting the /etc/.pwd.lock lock file too? -- ciao, Marco signature.as

Re: RFC: XINE and plugins without Depends cause hangs due to a bug

2005-09-15 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:38:28 +0200]: > I believe the "not coping" above is a xine bug, but one that I have no > time, nor interest, on hunting, reporting upstream, or whatever. I > will file it in our BTS, though, by sending a copy of this mail. But > still, and in the meanti

Try that job

2005-09-15 Thread Sarah Brandon
USA located financial company is in search of the agents in the United Kingdom. You have to be older then 22. Honest and serious. Also you need to have basic financial skills and accounting skills. Salary is 2700-3300 pounds per month. It is possible to use as a part time job. Send me your resume t

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Richard Atterer
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:12:54PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: > Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever) > so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync with each > other and with the host DB automaticall, so that, for example, a > useradd, usermod, or us

Re: Bug#327029: Non-functional with read-only /dev

2005-09-15 Thread SZALAY Attila
Hi All (and sorry for my English)! I have a bug about syslog-ng. This bug is a reincarnation of an already closed bug, but I afraid, if I close this too, another incarnation will be happened. The problem is, that nor sysklogd nor syslog-ng could operate if couldn't write to /dev. (They try to rem

Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Lawrence Williams
Hello, I am working on a package that Build-Depends on libasound2-dev, but can be built on non-Linux OSs. Is there any way to shape the Build-Dep so that libasound2-dev is only used if we are building for a Linux system? I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Nico Golde
Hallo Lawrence, * Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 17:46]: > I am working on a package that Build-Depends on libasound2-dev, but can be > built on non-Linux OSs. Is there any way to shape the Build-Dep so that > libasound2-dev is only used if we are building for a Linux system?

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Lawrence Williams
Thanks Nico, But I want the libasound2-dev Build-Depend to only be used if we are building for Linux, not BSD or anything else :) Lawrence On September 15, 2005 01:20 pm, Nico Golde wrote: > It does prevent the build on the specified archs, yes. > Regards Nico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 17:56]: > But I want the libasound2-dev Build-Depend to only be used if we are building > for Linux, not BSD or anything else :) oh sorry, misunderstandig. regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngo

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:14PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: > I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep on > linux-kernel-headers, but I wasn't sure if I should follow their example: > > linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.6.13+0rc3-1.1) > [!hurd-i386 !netbsd-i386

Re: Bug#327029: Non-functional with read-only /dev

2005-09-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 15, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What should I do? Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching. AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will not work. So either he uses udev, or in some way makes his own writeable /dev. -- ciao, Marco

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Rob Browning
"Ernestas V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps hard/symlinking original /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow and /etc/group > to chrooted environments would help? Thanks for the suggestion, but I suspect that locking wouldn't work correctly in such an arrangement. If you could tell the system to use a

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
David Nusinow wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:14PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: >> I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep >> on >> linux-kernel-headers, but I wasn't sure if I should follow their example: >> >> linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.6.13+0rc3-1

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 13:13 -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on a package that Build-Depends on libasound2-dev, but can be > built on non-Linux OSs. Is there any way to shape the Build-Dep so that > libasound2-dev is only used if we are building for a Linux system? You

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 13:05 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Doesn't the type-handling package do what you guys are looking for? Yes, it does. And it rocks. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D Infini

Re: Bug#327029: Non-functional with read-only /dev

2005-09-15 Thread SZALAY Attila
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: : > Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching. > AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will > not work. On FreeBSD it works. So I think it's possible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Rob Browning
Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>From the adduser/addgroup manpage: > > If the file /usr/local/sbin/adduser.local exists, it will be executed > after the user account has been set up in order to do any local setup. > The arguments passed to adduser.local are: username uid gi

Re: Bug#327029: Non-functional with read-only /dev

2005-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:12:16PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > : > > Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching. > > AF_UNIX sockets must be created on a rw file system, and a symlink will > > not work. > > On FreeBSD it work

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lawrence Williams [Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:13:14 -0230]: > I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep on > linux-kernel-headers, but I wasn't sure if I should follow their example: > linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.6.13+0rc3-1.1) > [!hurd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !kfreebsd-i38

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:10:38PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 13:05 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > Doesn't the type-handling package do what you guys are looking for? > > Yes, it does. And it rocks. Dude, throw away the crackpipe. It's one of the most ugly hacks

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Lawrence Williams a écrit : Hello, I am working on a package that Build-Depends on libasound2-dev, but can be built on non-Linux OSs. Is there any way to shape the Build-Dep so that libasound2-dev is only used if we are building for a Linux system? I seen an example of a possible choice in x

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Kevin B. McCarty a écrit : David Nusinow wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:14PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep on linux-kernel-headers, but I wasn't sure if I should follow their example: linux-kernel-headers (>

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 20:05 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Dude, throw away the crackpipe. It's one of the most ugly hacks I've > ever seen. It works, but that's about it. I have to say it works well for me and I like it. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/

Re: Bug#327029: Non-functional with read-only /dev

2005-09-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:12:16PM +0200, SZALAY Attila wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:30 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > : > > > Tell the user to learn how UNIX works, and stop bitching. > > > AF_UNIX sockets must be created on

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:12:54PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: >> >> Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever) >> so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync wit

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:17:06PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 20:05 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Dude, throw away the crackpipe. It's one of the most ugly hacks I've > > ever seen. It works, but that's about it. > > I have to say it works well for me and I like i

Re: architecture alias and disto rebuild

2005-09-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:58:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Bill Allombert [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:39:36 +0200]: > > So I propose a alternate solution: > > > If the distro foobar rebuild packages on i386, they could use > > i386foobar as architecture name instead of i386, this way every

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Rob Browning
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Notice that the /etc/schroot/setup.d/30passwd was used to sync the > passwd and related files by copying them into the chroot from the main > system. While it's a simple copy in this case, you can easily > customise the script to sync the other way on ses

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 20:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > type-handling is ugly and should be considered as deprecated. It will be > replaced in the future by a the support of build-dependencies like > [linux-any]. I hope the support will appear soon there (the patch to > support that

Re: Managing users and groups within multiple devel chroots.

2005-09-15 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Notice that the /etc/schroot/setup.d/30passwd was used to sync the >> passwd and related files by copying them into the chroot from the main >> system. While it's

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:05:31PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:14PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote: > >> I seen an example of a possible choice in xorg-x11 packages that Build-Dep > >> on > >> linux-kernel-headers, but I wasn't sure if

piuparts mass bug filing, summary

2005-09-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Greetings from your friendly neighborhood package torturer. I ran piuparts on most of etch/main. This resulted in somewhere between one and two thousand failures. For a long time, I read and tried to figure out what the cause of each failure was. Eventually I gave up: there were too many failures

Interfaces for dpkg/deb packages

2005-09-15 Thread Christopher Crammond
Greetings All: First-time poster, please be gentle. :) I was curious as to where I might be able to find out what non-command-line interfaces into .deb packages are available. For instance, is there a C interface that could pull out information such as Name, Version, Release, etc... ? I posted

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Josselin Mouette a écrit : Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 20:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno a écrit : type-handling is ugly and should be considered as deprecated. It will be replaced in the future by a the support of build-dependencies like [linux-any]. I hope the support will appear soon there (the

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:39:37PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > I am taking the liberty to write this even though I am not a DD. Hope Well, I said DDs in my mail because i was mailing -devel, but the document is open to contributions from anyone, just like anything in Debian :-) > one us

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I've fixed some of a), b) or c) with the help of Santiago Vila who is doing > > the Spanish translation but more peer review is needed here. > > Note that the docum

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:39:37PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: I am taking the liberty to write this even though I am not a DD. Hope Well, I said DDs in my mail because i was mailing -devel, but the document is open to contributions from any

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I object to the notion that | Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian | developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing. which rather permeates the document. I read that somewhere in o

downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:22:25AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >Package: pbzip2 >Version: 0.9.4-1 >Severity: serious >Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. >Tags: sid > > >pbzip2 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due >to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaroun

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:50AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with > >less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. > +ifneq (,$(findstring m68k,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) > + CFLAGS = -Wall -O0 > +endif For the record, -O2 se

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Lawrence Williams
Thanks, Your option sound like exactly what I need. The package using libasound2-dev during build only needs it if we are using Linux. The packages could possibly be built on a Debian BSD port or whatever in the future. I apologize if my e-mail wasn't clear. The linux-kernel-headers build-dep i

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:50AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > It would be nice if the optimization downgrade is done _only_ for > m68k as I did it for pbzip2 with the attached patch. Does pbzip2 make sense for m68k at all? I've never seen an SMP m68k... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: ht

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Miles Bader
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The document does not endorse using unstable. It clearly encourages to > use stable. But if one wants to choose between unstable and testing then > it says to go with unstable. It's fine to give reasons why unstable might be preferable given such

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread tony mancill
Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:50AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > >>>to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with >>>less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. > > >>+ifneq (,$(findstring m68k,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) >>+ CFLAGS = -Wall

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:15:16PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:50AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >>>to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with > >>>less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. > >>+ifneq

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 19:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:15:16PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:50AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > > >>>to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try co

Re: downgrading optimization for m68k [was: Bug#328453: pbzip2_0.9.4-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k]

2005-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:15:16PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > If gcc-4.0 is going to puke on lots of packages that use -O3, doesn't it > make more sense to upload a patched gcc-4.0 for m68k that silently > changes the optimization level back to 2 untile the problem with the > compiler can be fixe

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
Miles Bader wrote: But the sentence "Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing" is nonsensical; just get rid of it. -miles This has been corrected now. The corresponding question and answer are given below so that

Re: Interfaces for dpkg/deb packages

2005-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:40:06PM -0700, Christopher Crammond wrote: > Greetings All: > > First-time poster, please be gentle. :) > > I was curious as to where I might be able to find out what > non-command-line interfaces into .deb packages are available. For > instance, is there a C interfac

Re: Bug#323227: new list: debian-planet to distribute planet.debian.org postings; archive to enable searching

2005-09-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Alexander Schmehl | * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050914 10:47]: | > | Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you | > | should not make it available on the Internet? | > I think there is a difference between putting it all in one place with | > a public archi

Re: Build-Depend'ing on libasound2-dev just for Linux

2005-09-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Josselin Mouette | If support for it is in etch's dpkg, we will be able to use it *after | the etch release*. The policy has always been to require only dpkg | features from the previous stable release. This is for Build-Depends, which doesn't have that restriction, aiui. -- Tollef Fog Heen

Work-needing packages report for Sep 16, 2005

2005-09-15 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 178 (new: 5) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 84 (new: 0) Total number of packages requeste

Re: Interfaces for dpkg/deb packages

2005-09-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Christopher Crammond | I was curious as to where I might be able to find out what | non-command-line interfaces into .deb packages are available. For | instance, is there a C interface that could pull out information such as | Name, Version, Release, etc... ? No, there is no libdpkg yet. The

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

2005-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:52:01AM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > Miles Bader wrote: > >But the sentence > >"Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian > >developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing" is nonsensical; > >just get rid of it. > This has been cor