* Victor Seva [Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:39:09 +0200]:
Hola Victor,
thanks for your interest in adopting a Debian package!
> I am trying to contact with you, again, in order to take over the
> linux-wlan-ng package. Enrico Tassi and I have no answer from you. We
> are interested in maintain this pac
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://so.incdropfat.com
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> When I installed openoffice.org2, out went OOo 1.4. (Which
> surprised me, since I remember you writing that they are supposed
> to be parallel installable.)
Then you most probably had a thesaurus installed. The formats are
incompatible and so...
If you don't have a the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > > If it really should not be done, maybe a check could be added to lintian
> > > and/or linda and CDBS and the policy should be updated.
> >
> > There *is* a lintian check for this, and there is no need for policy to be
> > update
Il sistema Antivirus della posta elettronica Rai non permette la consegna del
messaggio con soggetto : Re: SMTP Server
Il messaggio inviato da : debian-devel@lists.debian.org é stato cancellato
perchè l' estensione del file allegato non é accettata.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi there,
I'm finally on the "working" computer. After having tried to build the
.dev package again, here is the missing info.
The command used for compiling 'geo' (one of the binaries that must be
linked to librheolef.so (the shared library)) is the following one :
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
2 complete power outages for that room.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:33 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > When I installed openoffice.org2, out went OOo 1.4. (Which
> > surprised me, since I remember you writing that they are supposed
> > to be parallel installable.)
>
> Then you most probably had a thesaurus i
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:20:29PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> * Package name: enc
That is a very generic name. Since this is a tool meant especially for
mailinglists, could it be renamed to "enclist" or "encmailing" or
something more specific?
> * URL : http://www.neuroni.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> * Guus Sliepen [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:08:31AM +0200]:
> > > * URL : http://www.neuroni.org/
> >
> > I can't find any reference to enc on that Italian website.
>
> Try https://neuroni.org/ml/docs.php
That points me t
* Guus Sliepen [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:08:31AM +0200]:
> > * URL : http://www.neuroni.org/
>
> I can't find any reference to enc on that Italian website.
Try https://neuroni.org/ml/docs.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:42:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
>
> > > > If it really should not be done, maybe a check could be added to lintian
> > > > and/or linda and CDBS and the policy should be updated.
> > >
> > > There *is
Hello debians,
I am not using debian and can thus not build and maintain debian packages.
Thus I am looking for someone, who audits and maintains policyd-weight -
a policy daemon in perl for postfix.
The master site is http://robtone.mine.nu/postfix/
I am a FreeBSD contributor and maintaining t
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 12:10]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, Jun 28 2005, 11:46:31PM]:
> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-pkg-tracking-system
[...]
> > Maybe I missed something?
>
> I wrote a such script a while ago,
>
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
> > think it were critical that i do so...
>
> > http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
>
> > say it isn't so!
>
> It isn't so.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 12:18 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> The 'build-essential' package itself is not build-essential, it's a
> helper package depending 'accidently' on all build-essential packages.
Does that mean that packages shouldn't be build-depending on the
build-essential package it
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> In my experience as a listmaster, the people who like to complain about
> the fact that we add a signature on the bottom of every email, will
> usually find a number of other things they dislike. [...]
That's funny. I don't like the high number of spam m
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> related to very old versions. Now the maintainer changes.
> Now he wants to send mails to all bug openors if the bug is
> still actual and can be reproduced.
Hallo Santiago,
* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 13:21]:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> > An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> > related to very old versions. Now the maintainer changes.
> > Now he wants to s
Le mardi 28 juin 2005 à 14:48 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis a écrit :
> > To make things clearer: there is no way to tell whether a program
> > actually needs librsvg2-common. Even testing it with and without
> > librsvg2-common installed wouldn't be enough, as it could e.g. make use
> > of themes that
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hallo Santiago,
>
> * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 13:21]:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> > > An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> > > related to very old versi
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, James Troup wrote:
> A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
> houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
> State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
> 2 complete power outages for that room. Thes
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:30:04AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
> houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
> State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
> 2 complete power outages
While looking for a solution I realized that it had something to do with
the libtool that was generated in the top_builddir. If I used
/usr/bin/libtool the -rpath was correct. So with some help from `diff` I
found out what seemed to be a cause, enable-fast-install must be enabled.
I'm trying n
Dear Ruby users
I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
/usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
ref:
- http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.htm
On 29-Jun-05, 07:26 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BTS is public, and we encourage public discussion of bugs, so you
> should not assume that the old maintainer talked with the submitter in
> private to begin with.
The design of the BTS (mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-28 13:10:04 +0200]:
> Hello Igor,
>
> * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-09 15:48]:
> > * Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 10:25:44 +0100]:
> >
> > > developer.php is currently configured not to check against any external
> > > ke
Cheap Software-Upgrades-educational bargains-oem-Software Buyer's Guide.
http://lfv.c1y9xtunr4ujrvu.putrefydl.com
Very little is needed to make a happy life.
Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:52 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> Dear Ruby users
>
>
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
Any speci
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 08:29 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I've noticed that http://www.debian.org/distrib/cd/ and
> > > http://www.debian.org/CD/ are basically the same. /CD/ has more
> > > information than /distrib/cd/, so perhaps it would be best to make
> > > /distrib/cd/ redirect to /CD/
* Baptiste Carvello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> First I wanted to say again that whatever your final decision, a build
> system
> that optionally does the renaming would still be appreciated. It would be
> even
> better if the MoFo would do it themselves, of course. I'm sure some u
Hi Yamada-san,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:52:32AM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> ref:
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:17:28AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:56:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:30:32PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Le mardi 28 juin 2005
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Their trademark policy is something that should not exist in a free
> > software context. They don't care about free software. They don't care
> > about distributors/vendors.
>
> What
Miles Bader dijo [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:14:02PM +0900]:
> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whew. That was close. I thought we were gonna lose evilfinder.
>
> ... if we did, that would show that Debian really _is_ evil -- and if
> that's true, evilfinder must be capable of true proph
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think if DFSG 4 had intended to grant licensors broad latitude to invent
> novel ways of prevent such an inference from being drawn, it would have
> been worded differently -- or, at least, the last two sentences would have
> been.
Bear in mind that
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > Placing a footer in list traffic is a compromise between modifying
> > messages as little as possible and trying to help people find a way
> > to get their questions answered.
>
> A bad co
On 2005/06/30, at 4:11, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
>> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> Any specific idea why not use 'i486-linux-gnu'? I've seen it was already
> reported on the bug you ment
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Their trademark policy is something that should not exist in a free
> > > software context. They don't care about free software. T
Special Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an iss
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:01:05AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> My problem with it is DFSG 8. If we accept a trademark license, we're
> attaching additional rights to the program that are Debian-specific. I
> understand that the DFSG were framed in the context of copyright
> licenses, but I thin
41 matches
Mail list logo
