Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-pager
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Lorenzo Alberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Richard
Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Pager
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-cache-lite
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Fabien Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite/
* License : LGPL
Description : PHP PE
Le Mer 22 Juin 2005 02:52, Ben Burton a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Since my spare time is not what it used to be, I have put a few KDE
> apps up for adoption this morning:
>
> kdbg (#315336) -- graphical debugger interface
> kprof (#315337) -- visual tool to help analyse profiling results
> kbear
you can use pptpd (poptop).
But I prefer pppoe. The main thing is connectiong server to RADIUS
(freeradius) server. This RADIUS can use MYSQL. You can use web
scripts (PHP-using same MYSQL tables) to add users, set quote ... and
everything you want.
DO NOT use PAP authentication becouse passwords
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
advantage of the C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tsung-Hsiang Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openvanilla
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Lukhnos D. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kang-ming Liu, Weizhong Yang, Tian-jian Jiang,
Meng-juei Hsieh
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critical parts of
infrastructure like ftpmaster be mo
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:21, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
>
> Yes, it is, if every suggestion for "improvement" is a poor one. Lack
> of good ideas does
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:46, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
> > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not
> > helpful.
>
> I am ok with
On Monday 20 June 2005 21:45, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, the major problem now are the @packages.debian.org addresses, I
> have ~20 of them and most days they account for 1/3 to 1/2 of all the
> spam I receive (and almost all of it could be blocked with the CBL).
Why not j
On Jun 22, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just block mail sent to the packages.debian.org addresses? No-one
> sends real mail to them anyway so they are just a free pass for spammers.
Mainly because I do not know if I can do it without creating
backscatter, and I will not /de
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:46, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
>> > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an i
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21
Martin> 14:44]:
>> Are there any kind of documents describing how to move from
>> raidtools safely to mdadm without loosing a raid?
Martin>
http://www
> "Jonas" == Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jonas> YAIRD is a sysfs-based initrd builder. It determines
Jonas> which modules to load based on the same algorithms as
Jonas> hotplug. Unlike Debian's stock initrd-tools, the kernel
Jonas> being booted need not suppo
"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying fo
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>>
>> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary d
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:32, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I am ok with anti-spam measures which enable a well-behaving false
> >> positive sender to know they have run afoul, and in which the
> >> maintainers of the mechanism promise to try and adjust the system so
> >> t
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:23, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 22, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not just block mail sent to the packages.debian.org addresses?
> > No-one sends real mail to them anyway so they are just a free pass for
> > spammers.
>
> Mainl
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:21:52PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 21:45, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, the major problem now are the @packages.debian.org addresses, I
> > have ~20 of them and most days they account for 1/3 to 1/2 of all the
> > spam I r
On Jun 22, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I am thinking too much in the future, but I would really like to
> see yaird in Debian be able to use klibc in Debian for all the user
> tools (I believe there is already an ITP for klibc).
People are working on this.
--
ciao,
Marco
signa
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I think the point is that we ask for a donation before we spend money
> > on it.
>
> Sure, but the statement quoted above rules it out entirely. "can't pay" is
> pretty definitive. I'm wonder
Hi,
what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
requests which are totally stupid.
If we would include it in reportbug everybody can use a
template (for example similiar to the ITP template) and
reportbug could check if ther
> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
> > separation, etc.)
> xinetd begone. There is no justification for using anything
> resembling inetd on a modern system.
What planet do you live on? I want MORE use of inetd, not less. I want to be
able to select a service, a
On 22/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> > o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critic
[Nico Golde]
> what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
> I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
> requests which are totally stupid.
Encouraging people so inexperienced as to post stupid RFSes to upload
*more* things to Debian is not particularly productive
[Jonas Meurer]
> paying for any parts of infrastructure would delete the independance
> from donations. debian was never depending on any donations, for
> good reasons. if we change this, the next step will be that some
> monstrous companies offer deals to us: "We give you money, you give
> us XY
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Nico Golde]
> > what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
> > I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
> > requests which are totally stupid.
> Well, either way, I'd suggest a separate script.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> >>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hostin
I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
Without the patch, the relevant contents of the .deb are:
$ dpkg -c librote0_0.2.6-1_
Now that sarge has released, I really want to move to the 1-0stable series
of the dovecot IMAP/POP3 server in sid. However being really busy with
various things I thought it might be prudent to get one or more
co-maintainers to help out so it can get done quickly. (Though there are
a couple o
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
>for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
>I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
>
>Without the patch, the relevant contents of the .deb a
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 11:14 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
> for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
> I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
>
> Without
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
> advantage of the California Community Colocation Project, which offers
> free colocation for non-profits and individuals.
Unfortunat
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> You will also need to be careful about when you run dh_makeshlibs if you
> manually set the version numbers.
>
In debian/rules, I have this:
# shared library versions, option 1
version=0.2.6
major=0
Is that what I need to change?
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Freddie Unpenstein <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
>> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
>> > separation, etc.)
>> xinetd begone. There is no justification for using anything
>> resembling inetd on a modern system.
> What planet
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:16, Brian May wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.e
>n.html#s-mdadm
> The documentation said that there was no need for a config file, and I
> never used a 2.2 kernel, so the paragraphs starting with "If your RAID
> array was
On 6/22/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> > send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already
[Olaf van der Spek]
> I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> load on central servers?
Please give some specific examples of what you mean.
Debian services are already distributed across a wide ra
On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Olaf van der Spek]
> > I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> > (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> > load on central servers?
>
> Please give some specific examples of wha
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunatly the CCCP is currently maxed out on power in its existing
> racks, so is not taking new clients, unless one moves.
Is this true for its "sister sites" too? The web page says they have
sites in Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, and Washington.
Thomas
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/22/2005, 06:47:05 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:52:46 +0200
> Source: libdbd-pg-perl
> Binary: libdbd-pg-perl
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.42-0sarge1
> Distribution: sta
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:19:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:21, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
> >
> > Yes, it is, if ever
I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
(IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
ensure that users with iceme or icepref currently installed see icewmcp
as the "next versio
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
> longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
> (IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
> ensure that users with
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 13:09 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> That would make the "you forgot this, and this or this"
> useless in my opinion.
> What do you think? I would write this patch, if you agree.
> Regards Nico
You could write the patch, file a wishlist bug against reportbug and
send it to the bu
la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
> I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in turn,
> upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then looks for
> /usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that is were produced during the package's
> install or upgrade and not rem
ma, 2005-06-20 kello 16:47 +0100, Paul Brossier kirjoitti:
> how about an optional debian/package.piuparts file that would contain
> the syntax to make runtime tests? this would allow to check that
> executables can be run, and possibly that their result is consistent. it
> could even be used to de
Could the Debian mail servers be reconfigured to put more information in the
Received: lines?
Below is a sample from the headers of a mail sent to me by gluck. You will
note that my server logs that the envelope recipient was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
while gluck puts no such data in the log entry.
T
On Thursday 23 June 2005 07:17, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, it is, if every suggestion for "improvement" is a poor one. Lack
> > > of good ideas does not justify bad ones; not having any good ideas does
> > > not invalidate or in any way reduce the value of pointing out the
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Finally, it reports problems against the state of the directory
> tree at the last distribution compared with the state without
> the packages having been installed.
It would be useful if it could report the same problems in the
intermediate dis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Frost wrote:
:: Based on the requirements it seems unlikely Debian
:: would be able to afford to pay for hosting very
:: long with our current donation income amounts.
:: Gigabit network connections and associated rack space
:: is cheaper than
On 06/22/05 12:02:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Freddie Unpenstein <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
> >> > separation, etc.)
>
> >> xinetd begone. There is no justification for us
#include
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Wed, Jun 22 2005, 12:41:08PM]:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> >
> > You will also need to be careful about when you run dh_makeshlibs if you
> > manually set the version numbers.
> >
>
> In debian/rules, I have this:
>
> # shared
53 matches
Mail list logo
