sir,
can u please give me the information bout the decik WAP phone simulator.i.e., the brief description about the phone simulator.
thanking you
Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE!http://in.m
On Saturday 04 June 2005 07.50, venkat prasad wrote:
> sir,
>
> can u please give me the information bout the decik WAP phone
> simulator.i.e., the brief description about the phone simulator.
As far as I can tell, Debian does not ship the decit WAP phone simulator, so
I don't know what
Dear Release Team!:-)
I think: it is a Grave usability bug in Sarge, but, THX 2 Adeodato Simó,
it is now solved.
Please, Accept this important bugfix for Sarge. THX!!
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Please, help 2 solve this problem!!
>
> Will do, but sorry, not for sarge. N
El Viernes 03 Junio 2005 01:57, Adam Heath escribió:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as you've probably heard, Google has a "summer of code" initiative to
> > stimulate open source coding. They are looking for mentors to support the
> > coders. Shouldn't Debian be on
Hello!
On Wed 25 May 2005 07:17 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> * Package name: cl-rfc2388
> Version : x.y.z
0.9
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Janis Dzerins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
http://common-lisp.net/project/rfc2388/
Security - we offer more consumer guarantees than any other website
http://tswary.kznd632vzcka63k.solicsol8.com
There are two rules for success: 1) Never tell everything you know.
[Time is] the most valuable thing a man can spend.
What we anticipate seldom occurs: but what we least expect g
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:59:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam Heath]
> > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
> > interact once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are
> > built.
>
> I disagree. It should give recommodations on how they sh
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:18:50AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Regarding your specific example, I know of no reason why Debian couldn't
> > use Ubuntu's X.org packages when Debian is ready to make the transition,
> > but in the end that will be the XS
Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 21:14 +0900, Taku YASUI a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: rast
> Version : 0.1.1
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.netlab.jp/rast/
> * License : GPL
> Description :
Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 21:14 +0900, Taku YASUI a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: rast
> Version : 0.1.1
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.netlab.jp/rast/
> * License : GPL
> Description :
Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 21:14 +0900, Taku YASUI a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: rast
> Version : 0.1.1
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.netlab.jp/rast/
> * License : GPL
> Description :
OK, here is idea/solution for problems with packaging.
All new Ubuntu packages should have ITP on Debian lists. For example, if
I package app that isn't in Debian, and I package it for Ubuntu, I will
fill ITP for that package on Debian list.
That package will or will not be accepted to Debian, bu
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:25:01 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (To answer the thread leader, I consider Ubuntu to be more and more of a
> fork and less and less a derivative distribution. If Ubuntu doesn't
> start to re-converge with Debian significantly after sarge is released,
> and w
[Ante Karamati?]
> All new Ubuntu packages should have ITP on Debian lists. For
> example, if I package app that isn't in Debian, and I package it for
> Ubuntu, I will fill ITP for that package on Debian list.
This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
maintainers are not too happ
Greeting lists,
Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
have done that and the result [2] is now available to the public. I
would like to announce it in the hopes that new and experienced Debian
d
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:59:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I disagree. It should give recommodations on how they should be
> built, to make it easier for the java developers to maintain the java
> packages. Consistency reduce the work maintaining packages, and using
> a common system
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 18:38 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> well.
Do you ha
Your medicine source:
http://yfoluwzgefjkxe60uiiyxgpwufhw.sheavemanjj.com/
arcsine
[Sean Finney]
> can you give an example of anywhere else in debian where developers
> are forced to use a specific build tool/system for their packages?
Hard to tell, I haven't spend time looking. But I can give an example
of a person unable to discover that I didn't suggest forcing anyone to
do
Hello Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a disapointing
> one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn't install from installation CD,
> but the fact that their archives only hold their limited pa
Where could I find out about projects that still need developers. I could
code in perl and java. Please tell me where I can read the resources
regarding to the available projects in debian.
Thxn in advance
--
Blog: http://jroller.com/page/defkewl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hard to tell, I haven't spend time looking. But I can give an example
> of a person unable to discover that I didn't suggest forcing anyone to
> do anything. I formulated a 'recommend and not require' suggestion in
> my mail.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scim-input-pad
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : James Su <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.scim-im.org/
* License : GPL
Description : on-screen input pad IM engine m
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:16:50 +0200
Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dale,
>
> Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> > >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a
> > >disapointing
> > one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would like to announce it in the hopes that new and experienced Debian
> developers and users will review it and provide some feedback. After a
> [2] http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr/?page=debcustomize
"The official Debian packages are built by a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: gaim-latex
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Nicolas Schoonbroodt
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim-latex
* Lice
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 06:38:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ante Karamati?]
> > All new Ubuntu packages should have ITP on Debian lists. For
> > example, if I package app that isn't in Debian, and I package it for
> > Ubuntu, I will fill ITP for that package on Debian list.
>
> This is
Hey Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 12:33 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> When using apt-get on a system installed from the installation CD (not the
> live
> CD) apt-get points to the Ubuntu archives, which only contain a very limited
> subset of Debian's main archives. I had limited success i
[Bill Allombert]
> Should Ubuntu encourage such behaviour ?
Is it? I doubt they do.
Not all package maintainers in Ubuntu are paid by Canonical, and thus
fairly out of control of the corporate Ubuntu policies. Just as in
Debian, I guess, were several package maintainers demonstrate
questionable
[Daniel Holbach]
> Do you have a particular case in mind?
I'm not going to provide examples, no.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bill,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:47 -0500 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> > maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> > maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> > well.
>
> Shou
Le Samedi 4 Juin 2005 19:43, Martin Braure de Calignon a écrit :
[...]
> Provides the use of LaTeX code in conversation in gaim. The code is
> converted in image by tex2im script (imagemagick) and the image is sent to
> your contact.
[...]
Just a little mistake : according to the author of gaim-l
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:14:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Daniel Holbach]
> > Do you have a particular case in mind?
> I'm not going to provide examples, no.
Would it be possible to provide some general description of the sorts of
problem they see?
--
"You grabbed my hand and we f
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Daniel Holbach]
> > Do you have a particular case in mind?
>
> I'm not going to provide examples, no.
I'm very unhappy, about your answers and this whole thread in general.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you
Le samedi 04 juin 2005 à 20:18 +0200, Florent Bayle a écrit :
> Le Samedi 4 Juin 2005 19:43, Martin Braure de Calignon a écrit :
> [...]
> > Provides the use of LaTeX code in conversation in gaim. The code is
> > converted in image by tex2im script (imagemagick) and the image is sent to
> > your c
[Daniel Holbach]
> Hi Petter,
Hi.
> But the atmosphere in the thread is tense and full of
> misunderstandings. With every mail it becomes clearer that we're
> all miles away from actually making plans and discussing concrete
> specifications of what's to happen.
I'm not that pessimistic. Perha
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/11/msg01345.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/11/msg01347.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:29:02AM -0400, Dale C. Scheetz wrote:
> >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a disapointing
> one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn't install from installation CD,
Can you explain what you mean by this statement about the CD? Did the
i
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 06:38:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ante Karamati?]
> > All new Ubuntu packages should have ITP on Debian lists. For
> > example, if I package app that isn't in Debian, and I package it for
> > Ubuntu, I will fill ITP for that package on Debian list.
>
> This i
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:13:35PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Bill Allombert]
> > Should Ubuntu encourage such behaviour ?
>
> Is it? I doubt they do.
Certainly not. Quite the opposite, in fact.
> Not all package maintainers in Ubuntu are paid by Canonical, and thus
> fairly out of
Hi Petter,
thank you very much for that mail.
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> And more specificly, we are discussing how to make sure (new/not in
> debian) packages in Ubuntu also make it into Debian. I suspect we are
> under the assumtion that packages are
[Matt Zimmerman]
> Is this judgement based on some experience you had with an Ubuntu
> developer?
The observation (judgement is stretching it too far) is based on my
very limited experience with packages in Ubuntu which are/were missing
in Debian.
> I'd like to hear about it, because this is cert
Could you point me at a RealPlayer for each and every platform Debian
supports?
No, but real player's core (Helix Player) is open source. The codecs are use
restricted to personal use, and the codec source is available *for porting
only*, under a a binding contract. (This they label a Eula, but
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Ante [iso-8859-2] Karamati? wrote:
All new Ubuntu packages should have ITP on Debian lists. For example, if
I package app that isn't in Debian, and I package it for Ubuntu, I will
fill ITP for that package on Debian list.
Great!
I would tell this idea quite natural and I wou
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Dale C. Scheetz wrote:
Knoppix is much better about using Debian packages and adding configuration
integration of a much wider range of Debian packages.
Sure. Knoppix is basically builded by a single person.
Didn't I said that just using what Debian provides is quite effect
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Ok, there are a couple of maintainers who are not DDs, so they won't be
able to maintain them in both, Ubuntu an Debian, but I think everybody
is perfectly happy to group-maintain packages in both worlds.
It might be not very hard to find a sponsor for
Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
> > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should interact
> > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are built.
>
> As an example, debhelper, while being very useful for maintainers, is not
> mandated
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote:
But the atmosphere in the thread is tense and full of misunderstandings.
You are right here and I love if we could solve this.
With every mail it becomes clearer that we're all miles away from
actually making plans and discussing concrete specificatio
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Joshua Jackson wrote:
Where could I find out about projects that still need developers. I could
code in perl and java. Please tell me where I can read the resources
regarding to the available projects in debian.
Please take a look at http://webmin.alioth.debian.org/ partic
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 23:50 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>
> > But the atmosphere in the thread is tense and full of misunderstandings.
> You are right here and I love if we could solve this.
Nice you say that. :)
> > I was at the Ubuntu Confere
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
> > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
> > > interact
> > > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are built.
> >
> > As an example, debhelpe
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:43:00PM +0200, Martin Braure de Calignon wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gaim-latex
> Version : 0.3
> Upstream Author : Nicolas Schoonbroodt
> * URL : http:
Do you want to see real amateurs who have webcams
on their computers in their dorm rooms? This is
not one of those sites with professional girls who
get paid to do this in front of the camera, these
are the average girls next door, at college, trying
to make money and meet guys!
Get free acce
Joshua Jackson:
>
> Where could I find out about projects that still need developers. I could
> code in perl and java. Please tell me where I can read the resources
> regarding to the available projects in debian.
Aside from Debian, you could browse the Sourceforge.net project list
sorted by progr
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:56:33PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Greeting lists,
>
> Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
> gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
> have done that and the result [2] is now available to the publi
Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
> gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
> have done that and the result [2] is now available to the public. I
> would like to announce it in the h
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I read it and it seems great! Haven't had a change to build anything yet
> but I'm sure it will help me when I do. a minor typo, search for
> 'since'. As someone commented, I believe pbuilder does not clean the
> chroot.
pbuilder does always clean the chro
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
> > gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
> > have done that and the result [2]
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:24:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matt Zimmerman]
> > Is this judgement based on some experience you had with an Ubuntu
> > developer?
>
> The observation (judgement is stretching it too far) is based on my
> very limited experience with packages in Ubuntu wh
Hi
I'm trying to solve bug #303860 but I need some help. The problem is that
the configure script errors on sparc because it can't find the KDE
libraries. All other architechtures build fine.
linda complained that the libtool files were pretty old, so my sponsor
suggested to update libtool and po
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:49:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
>> > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages
>> > should interact once installed. But stay the hell away from how
>> > they are built.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Eep, please don't tell people to give themselves full privileges with
>> sudo unless they know what they're doing. The sudo configuration here
>> is just to run pbuilder, right? I
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:53:06PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
> I read it and it seems great! Haven't had a change to build anything yet
> but I'm sure it will help me when I do. a minor typo, search for
> 'since'. As someone commented, I believe pbuilder does not clean the
> chroot. fo
* Christoph Wegscheider [Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:37:46 +0200]:
> "The official Debian packages are built by a buildd, also called build
> daemon, which makes use of pbuilder to ensure that every package is
^^^
That bit is wrong, buildd/buildds use 'sbuild'.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
> > gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
> > have done that and the result [2]
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 04:32:39AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Christoph Wegscheider [Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:37:46 +0200]:
>
> > "The official Debian packages are built by a buildd, also called build
> > daemon, which makes use of pbuilder to ensure that every package is
> ^
Hello,
Whats the deal with bug #307900?
As far as I can tell from reading the bug report, the bug has not been
fixed in sarge, will not be fixed for the release, but the bug has
been closed.
Have we come to the point where making a release is more important
then fixing known security bugs?
Does
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:01:58 +0200]:
> [Daniel Holbach]
Hello Petter, Daniel, let me pop in. It's my intention to be
constructive.
> I believe we are discussing how to keep the packages in Debian and
> Ubuntu as synchronized as possible,
Specifically, packages in univer
Little magic. Perfect weekends.
http://mwofk.iflb410tfa08m1i.walepiececc.com
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
I think, therefore Descartes exists.
We must become the change we want to see.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> "The official Debian packages are built by a buildd, also called build
> daemon, which make use of sbuild (a package similar in function to
> pbuilder) to ensure that every package is built in a clean environment
> (note: some slower architectures do not
Hey Adeodato,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> but on the
> packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository
> and whatever.
This sounds really cool.
> specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here
> either (correct me
71 matches
Mail list logo
