Hello,
about two weeks ago, I have send this message to the maintainers of
opencv and libdc1394/coriander, without answer at all:
- Forwarded message from Olivier Bornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:03:32 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Olivier Borne
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:21:45PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 11:48]:
> >> One could decide to let RM: bugs on ftp.d.o always linger a certain
> >> amount of time before processing,
* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-22 23:21]:
> >> One could decide to let RM: bugs on ftp.d.o always linger a certain
> >> amount of time before processing, for complete removals, in any case.
> >
> > That's someone I wanted to suggest anyway. While I'm happy to see
> > removals h
> This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
>
> Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload to
> Debian instead of Ubuntu).
Indeed that's the case, sorry all
Jani
___
Cv-ul tau ia 500 euro/luna!
http://500.myjob.ro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:55:30AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> On May 22 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> > > In my very humble and uninformed opinion, some maintainers should
> > > really give up maintaining their packages or should try to get other
> > > people as co-m
The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to
/usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in
postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine,
with or without blackbox installed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# dpkg -l fluxbox | grep ^ii
ii fluxbox
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Olivier Bornet wrote:
> as sarge is in freeze and the new stable version is coming soon, I will
> be very happy to have opencv packages in testing now. It seems it is
> blocked by libdc1394. Looking at libdc1394 don't show me the reason why
> this is blocke
Hi Steinar,
> > as sarge is in freeze and the new stable version is coming soon, I will
> > be very happy to have opencv packages in testing now. It seems it is
> > blocked by libdc1394. Looking at libdc1394 don't show me the reason why
> > this is blocked.
>
> libdc1394 is blocked since we are i
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:51:29AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to
> /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in
> postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine,
> with or without blackbox installed:
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1229 +0200]:
> Meh. This definitely looks like a dpkg bug, and it also explains
> how bug #309485 got to be the way it was. Well, at least we have
> an explanation now.
#310390
> > A problem arises (#310050) when 0.9.11-* is used to upg
El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 12:32, Jeroen van Wolffelaar escribió:
> There is the MIA effort, led by myself, that does periodically look for
> activity for all maintainers and inquire if activity is lacking.
> However, this takes a bit of time, and also, it does benefit to have
> tips about specific main
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > For further fun (and to see the exact bug that libldap2 was tripping
> > across), remove blackbox and then un-divert (by hand, in this case) bsetbg.
> > You get a nice little file named /usr/bin/bsetbg, which dpkg knows nothing
>
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1301 +0200]:
> > Looks good to me.
>
> I meant, do this with a version of fluxbox installed that no
> longer provides /usr/bin/bsetbg.
Isn't that just another incarnation of the dpkg bug?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me;
[Cesar Martinez Izquierdo]
> Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and
> solve all bugs, not only RC-bugs. If you are in lack of time, please
> consider to accept a co-maintainer or to orphan the package."
I think a lot of maintainers would be happy to accept a co-maintai
Hey - Don't get ripped off!
http://www.terima.net/ss/
Penis Enlargement Patch That Works!!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:32:55AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I do plan to start up a more structural package checking effort after
> Sarge is released, hopefully addressing at least part of your concerns.
Bring back the maintainer ping!
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:56:07PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and solve all
> bugs, not only RC-bugs. If you are in lack of time, please consider to accept
> a co-maintainer or to orphan the package."
A lot of bugs are
El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 16:24, Hamish Moffatt escribió:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:56:07PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and solve
> > all bugs, not only RC-bugs. If you are in lack of time, please consider
> > to accept a
On Mon, May 23, 2005 12:56, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and solve
> all bugs, not only RC-bugs. If you are in lack of time, please consider to
> accept a co-maintainer or to orphan the package."
I'd like to see it differently: co
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 04:30:49PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 16:24, Hamish Moffatt escribió:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:56:07PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > > Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and solve
> > > all bu
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:04:07AM -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
> Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
> will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
>
> Can I have 2 sponsors
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Olivier Bornet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to push opencv in testing ? And if not, can we do
> something to have opencv in testing soon ?
To keep the record straight:
merkel% madison libdc1394
libdc1394 |0.8.3-1 |stable | source
lib
Hi again,
> merkel% madison opencv
> opencv | 0.9.5-10 | testing | source
> opencv |0.9.6-1 | unstable | source
>
> So opencv and libdc1394 _are_ in testing, just not the latest version.
Right. Sorry for the incomplete message. I was asking for this update in
testing to
Hi, all
I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
Can I have 2 sponsors ?
[]
Jose Carlos
I'm the (previous) maintainer of unrar. Jose Carlos Medeiros has o
El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 17:09, Hamish Moffatt escribió:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 04:30:49PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 16:24, Hamish Moffatt escribió:
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:56:07PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
wrote:
> > > > Remember that Debian m
El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 16:20, Thijs Kinkhorst escribió:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 12:56, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > Remember that Debian maintainers' obligations include to track and solve
> > all bugs, not only RC-bugs. If you are in lack of time, please consider
> > to accept a co-maintainer
Hi, all
I read all comments, but I didnt understood what I need to do.
Ola Lundqvist is my sponsor, but if Jeroen or other could upload , I
will be grateful, because Ola is very busyed.
Can I have 2 sponsors ?
You can have 900 if you can find 900 people replying to your requests
still
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:54:20AM +0300, Jani wrote:
>
> > This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
> >
> > Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload to
> > Debian instead of Ubuntu).
>
> Indeed that's the case, sorry all
OK, no worries. But, you obviously have
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:07:24AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:54:20AM +0300, Jani wrote:
> >
> > > This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
> > >
> > > Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload to
> > > Debian instead of Ubuntu).
> >
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe a polite email from the MIA effort to maintainers with
> long-standing bugs (and no activity on them) could help. Something like:
> "Your package has the following long-standing bugs:
> # Description
> # Description
> Remember
> OK, no worries. But, you obviously have some patches. I'd encourage
> you (and other ubuntu maintainers) to send your patches to the Debian
> maintainers to possibly integrate into Debian.
>
> Should make less work for Ubuntu in the future, and also improve the
> quality of Debian. A win-wi
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://oath.weightlossfirm.com
Superb Quality Rolex.
The high! profile jewelry you're looking for at the lowest prices in the
nation!!..
http://www.ultimatetimepiece4u.net/
Choose from our collection of Rolex watches!
you airmail me panoply me you assyriology me tree me
you caucus me brigham me [2-5
--
To UNS
Hi all,
Does anybody want to test the current openswan 1:2.2.0-7 packages at
http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/
or should I upload to unstable? If nobody can give it a try, I intent to
upload tomorrow morning (GMT+2).
with best regards,
Rene
pgpfPMFhLmWTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:14:45PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> I was refering to bugs without any activity (ignored bugs).
If you mean bugs with no response ever rather than bugs that have just
not seen any reponse recently saying something like "no response" rather
than "no activity
El Lunes 23 Mayo 2005 23:22, Mark Brown escribió:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:14:45PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > I was refering to bugs without any activity (ignored bugs).
>
> If you mean bugs with no response ever rather than bugs that have just
> not seen any reponse recently sa
It seems as if devfs (yeah sure, deprecated) creates links such as
/dev/md0 --> /dev/md/0
/dev/md1 --> /dev/md/1
[...]
These actually break mdadm: #274859 and #310412. Thus, please
consider this urgent.
My (hack) solution is to remove those symlinks and replace them with
real device nodes
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For example, the maintainer asked for more info, the user submitted the
> requested info, and then there was no activity in the BTS for a year.
What exactly do you want the maintainer to do in this case?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:27, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For example, the maintainer asked for more info, the user submitted the
> > requested info, and then there was no activity in the BTS for a year.
>
> What exactly do you want the m
El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:42, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo escribió:
> El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:27, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> > Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > For example, the maintainer asked for more info, the user submitted the
> > > requested info, and then there
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, after a year, the bug should have been fixed, otherwise it should be
> tagged "help", and ideally the maintainer should write a short explanation
> about why he is unable to fix the bug (so that other people can really help
> him).
I
El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IMHO, after a year, the bug should have been fixed, otherwise it should
> > be tagged "help", and ideally the maintainer should write a short
> > explanation about why he is unable
Hi martin!
You wrote:
> /dev/md0 --> /dev/md/0
> /dev/md1 --> /dev/md/1
> My (hack) solution is to remove those symlinks and replace them with
> real device nodes (hardlinks don't work). To be able to confine this
> hack as close as possible to the problem it's supposed to solve,
> I need to
also sprach Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0040 +0200]:
> I think udev also created those links of the compat or the devfs
> rules are used.
True.
> Wouldn't it be better though to fix mdadm to just follow the
> links, like any other program should?
Yes, but I am not willing to do
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:24:28PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > The package description for binutils-dev says the following:
>
> > >Description: The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) This
> > > package includes header
On May 24, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My (hack) solution is to remove those symlinks and replace them with
> real device nodes (hardlinks don't work). To be able to confine this
Ugly. If you can't fix it correctly then leave it broken.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0155 +0200]:
> > My (hack) solution is to remove those symlinks and replace them with
> > real device nodes (hardlinks don't work). To be able to confine this
> Ugly. If you can't fix it correctly then leave it broken.
You funny monkey you.
tags 274859 +patch
thanks
[martin f krafft]
> I checked out the source and opening is not hard... but mdadm also
> creates device nodes and uses S_ISBLK all over the place, so I don't
> really know whether adding a "|| S_ISLNK" will fix it.
I didn't actually test this, but I honestly don't see w
On Monday May 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> tags 274859 +patch
> thanks
>
> [martin f krafft]
> > I checked out the source and opening is not hard... but mdadm also
> > creates device nodes and uses S_ISBLK all over the place, so I don't
> > really know whether adding a "|| S_ISLNK" will fix i
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:19:48AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0040 +0200]:
> > I think udev also created those links of the compat or the devfs
> > rules are used.
> True.
> > Wouldn't it be better though to fix mdadm to just follow t
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 00:50 -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> For some time I've been more or less MIA, but in the past month or so
> it became impossible for me to do debian work: the processor in my
> desktop, my only Debian machine (the only other machine I own has a
> proprietary, non-Linux compat
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:46:43AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:42, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo escribió:
> > El Martes 24 Mayo 2005 01:27, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> > > Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > For example, the maintainer
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a thought. How about setting up an aging system for who can fix the
> bugs. Give the maintainer N time period to act on the bug and then if
> the maintainer can not fix it or will not fix it, other folks who have a
> patch should be able to apply to fi
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a thought. How about setting up an aging system for who can fix the
> bugs. Give the maintainer N time period to act on the bug and then if
> the maintainer can not fix it or will not fix it, other folks who have a
> patch should be able to apply to fi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gff2ps
Version : 0.98d
Upstream Author : Josep Francesc ABRIL FERRANDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://genome.imim.es/software/gfftools/GFF2PS.html
* License
Any Software just in under $15-$99, Xp-adobe etc
http://fjecqt.9gv6uqr26jrgosr.sdlhnwkjeb.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Just a thought. How about setting up an aging system for who can fix the
> bugs.
We have that already. Everybody can sent in patches, and everybody can do
NMUs if they take responsibility and if they try not to step on maintainers
toes. Effectively we do
57 matches
Mail list logo
