[Note: IALNAP (I am lawyer, not a programmer), arguing solely in
Belgian/European context, and english is not my native language.]
On 07/05/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, that's not how it works. In the presence of a valid license
> contract, one is entitled to contrac
I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
remaining mails to my normal email address, using the standard mail
forwarding syntax:
:0
! [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am trying to switch to procmail on master, which involves putting
> a proper ~/.procmailrc in place and nothing else.
>
> However, a major problem arises due to spam. My last rule forwards
> remaining mails to my normal email address, using the stand
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
> Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
> usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
> didn't want to receive back to the sender, are you? (that would be
> bounce-spam).
Well, sur
Hi,
I am trying to create a pbuilder environment. Since the default
server ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp is *really* slow, I used the command
# pbuilder create --mirror http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
However, this ends with an unmet dependency message:
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
p
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
>> Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
>> usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
>> didn't want t
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
> > Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
> > usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
> > didn't want to receive back to the sender
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
> You should really accept messages from master before trying to
> reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
> not possible, don't forward email to such address.
The stuff my mail server rejects is 100%
also sprach Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1451 +0200]:
> Why not configure your mailserver to just /dev/null spam/viruses
> that originate from your debian.org address.
>
> You could put this in your .procmailrc:
>
> :0
> |/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'<>' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > :0
> > |/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f'<>' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
procmail: Executing "/usr/sbin/sendmail,-f'<>',[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
exim: '<>' - bad address: malformed address: ' may not follow '<>
It seems to work without quotes though.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the lis
Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
] # pbuilder create --mirror http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
I had the same error when making a pbuilder Sid environment, but Sarge
works for me. Add "--distribution sarge" to that command line.
--
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:49:56PM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to create a pbuilder environment. Since the default
>server ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp is *really* slow, I used the command
>
># pbuilder create --mirror http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
>
>However, this ends with an unmet
On Sat, 7 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1506 +0200]:
> > You should really accept messages from master before trying to
> > reject spam, i.e. use some kind of whitelist for master. If that's
> > not possible, don't forward email to suc
Am Samstag, den 07.05.2005, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Fester:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a pbuilder environment. Since the default
> server ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp is *really* slow, I used the command
>
> # pbuilder create --mirror http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
>
> However, this ends with a
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Samstag, den 07.05.2005, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Fester:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to create a pbuilder environment. Since the default
>> server ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp is *really* slow, I used the command
>>
>> # pbuilder create --mirror http://ftp
Thanks for all the answers :-)
Creating a sarge environment works well ...
Best Regards,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.07.1555 +0200]:
> Why bother to forward those messages to your mail server at all?
> The same base64 string you are using in postfix's body_checks will
> surely serve in your .procmailrc in master.
Because master is not the only machine that f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gobby
Version : 0.1.0 (currently 0.0+20050506)
Upstream Author : 0x539 dev group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://darcs.0x539.de/gobby/
* License : GPL
Description :
do you know how I can get the sheet music to this?
If so I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>
>
>>Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
>>bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
>
>
> Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of that "when it
> is ready"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
>>>bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually releas
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
> days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
> packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
> of a stable release;
I would like to know a goo solution for Proxy, Antivirus and antispan.
I need too block messenger and yahoo message app.
Alfonso J. Santana
Asociacion Cooperativa Linux Solutions, RL.
Caracas - Venezuela
URL://www.linuxsolutions.com.ve
Email: [EM
Hello all.
I've ITAd it (see #192676) and looking for a sponsor. I have fixed some
warnings and bugs that lintian reported.
The errors were:
E: xlogmaster binary:E: xlogmaster binary:
file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile /etc/xlogmaster/entries/README
E: xlogmaster binary:
file-in-etc-not-mark
Marc Haber wrote:
> The actual decisions are made in the background without even trying to
> talk to the body of developers. For example, the exim 4 maintainers
> were not even contacted by whoever made the decision to move the
> "default MTA" property from exim to exim4. We just found our package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gstreamer0.8-pitfdll
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pitfdll/
* License : GPL
Description
The release team has been fairly agressive for many months now about
removing RC buggy packages from sarge. I'm glad of this policy since we
now have a maneagable number of RC bugs. However, there's the
possibility this means some packages that are important to many people
have been dropped and the
On 5/7/05, Batist Paklons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Note: IALNAP (I am lawyer, not a programmer), arguing solely in
> Belgian/European context, and english is not my native language.]
It's really cool to have an actual lawyer weigh in, even if TINLAIAJ. :-)
> On 07/05/05, Michael K. Edwards
Hi folks, I'm a wanna-be new maintainer. With the helpful guidance
of Anibal, I've been working on a Debian package of Cogito. Cogito is
Pasky's distributed revision control system on top of Linus Torvalds'
GIT directory tracker.
I know there's an ITP for Cogito (#304602), I've tried to contact
[Andrea Mennucc]
> me, I do my part of the work in Debian
>
> and nobody ever contacted me regarding the choice of the number
What that...? Why on earth would you think you should be contacted
before this sort of decision is made?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
bb
I did not checked your complete list but our most frequently used
programs at exhigition boothes. It currently has no RC bug (the only
grave bug was solved two weeks ago.
So something is wrong either with your list of with the removal.
Kind regards
31 matches
Mail list logo
