Hi,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
because the ACPI interface does not exist for an architecture today that
it will never exist; it's not completely impossible that one
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >* The Invariant Section is retained, but another Invariant Section
> > containing a rebuttal is added to the document. This would a) look
> > silly, and b) be a beginning of Invariant Section bloat, in
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
> >included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
> >because the ACPI interface does not exist for an ar
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
> >included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
> >because the ACPI interface does not exist for an archi
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
list. :-)
>Umm, why?
Because it is the only way you can shut down PM capable PCI cards.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:05:35AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> >>Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
> >>list. :-)
>
> >Umm, why?
>
> Because it is the only way you can shut down PM capable PCI cards.
No, that's complete
[English summary: misdirected user request for help with P2P software on
MacOS X]
Sr. Arcos,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:11:31AM +0200, Pablo Arcos wrote:
> Estoy usando en aMule (bajando musica), con MacOS X.
> Tengo varios archivos de música que me están bloqueando el Ordenador
> porque pone qu
Carlos C Soto wrote:
With AllTray you can dock any application with no native tray icon
(like Evolution, Thunderbird, Terminals) into the system tray.
A high-light feature is that a click on the "close" button will
minimize back to system tray.
It works well with Gnome, KDE, XFCE 4, Fluxbox and Win
hi everbody
i'm forwarding this to the list and perhaps somebody could close the bug
for partimage-server, please?
greets
KoS
ps.: i am NOT a subscriber of the list so please take me on the CC
Original Message
Subject: Re: partimage-server
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:34:57 +0200
On 4/16/05, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A lot of people can't understand why we would consider software that comes
> with source code, is freely distributable, and may be modified in any way to
> be non-free simply because its license states that you may not use it if you
> are a
>There is no "system tray". The "system tray" is dead, a stiff, demised, no
more. >It is bereft of life. There is however a notification area, this is for,
eh, >notifying me of things that 'appen. It shouldn't be used as daft "system
tray", >thats a 'orrible 'orrible thing to do. This is an even mo
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
> list. :-)
The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
firmware. To the best of my knowledge, it has nothing that approximates
it either. ACPI is a speci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Matthew Garrett schrieb:
|>Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
|>list. :-)
| The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
| firmware.
I am aware of that. That is what is on my list. Enab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in may opinion it is more horrible that you think you can decide what other
people should do and what not. if the user want such functionality there should
be such a functionality. i know the HIG for the "new" notification area and it
is good for notificate the user. so way
Hi Martin
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:51 pm, Martin Kos wrote:
> hi everbody
>
> i'm forwarding this to the list and perhaps somebody could close the
> bug for partimage-server, please?
>
> greets
> KoS
>
> ps.: i am NOT a subscriber of the list so please take me on the CC
>
> Original Messag
Rob Bradford wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in may opinion it is more horrible that you
think you can decide what other
people should do and what not. if the user want such functionality
there should
be such a functionality. i know the HIG for the "new" notification area
and it
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >* The Invariant Section is retained, but another Invariant Section
> > > containing a rebuttal is added to the document. This would a) look
> > > silly, and b) be a beginning of Invariant Section bloat, in which a
> > > document could consist of 10% Invariant Sections
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libxsd-java
Version : Preview Version 1
Upstream Author : Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
* URL or Web page : https://msv.dev.java.net/
* License : Sun Binary Software License Agreement non-fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdom4j-java
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
* URL or Web page : http://www.dom4j.org/
* License : BSD style license
Description : flex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libxpp2-java
Version : 2
Upstream Author : Aleksander Slominski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/xgws/xsoap/xpp/
* License : Indiana Univers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The fact that there is a need for a rebuttal, in the first place, is
> > already a sign that something is very wrong.
>
> I don't argue with that. But when we explain why the GFDL is bad, we
> shouldn't
On 4/16/05, Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:48 -0500, Adam M. wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately this totally changes the purpose of "stable". Stable is
>
> Yes and no. It changes the concept of stable in that stable evolves.
> You still have the static release as
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Anyway, this is getting quite off-topic. Please reply off-list, if at
> all.
How are potential consequences of licensing restrictions off-topic (to
-project, anyway)? They seem directly relevant to the question of whether
and why
Patrick Ouellette dijo [Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:04:59AM -0400]:
> (...)
> Another difference is that testing will get new versions of packages and
> those versions might (but should not) cause breakage. Testing has had
> breakage issues in the past. Ten days is not enough time to catch all
> the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Goodaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: slony1
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.slony.org/
* License : (BSD)
Description : Slony-I is a "master to multiple
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:21:01PM -0400, Tim Goodaire wrote:
> Slony-I is a "master to multiple slaves" replication system with
> cascading and failover.
Note that there is already an ITP on this; you might want to coordinate with
whoever did that.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.ne
Would you believe it?
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This pat
On Mon 04/18/05 16:24, Adam M wrote:
> Also, try providing an efficient stable security build daemons! The
> chroots would have to be rebuilt for each package.
Just a thought, wouldn't this be done quit efficiently with unionfs?
Just install a minimalist root on one partition (or loopback). Then
t
Pardon me :)
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This patch truly
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mkdump
Version : 2.6.9-1.0
Upstream Author : NTT DATA CORPORATION and VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mkdump/
* License : GPL
Descri
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett schrieb:
>| The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
>| firmware.
>
> I am aware of that. That is what is on my list. Enabling support in the
> kernel should be trivial after that.
Ah, you want to add ACPI
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mkexec-2.4
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : NTT DATA CORPORATION and VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mkdump/
* License : GPL
Descri
Hey baby :)
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This patch truly r
What are the washing instructions?
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fu
Hi Arnaud,
I'm very happy that you created this ITP, because I created myself an RFP
for this one... :-)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=296643
Concerning the license, I already asked the developer (see above bug
report) and he told me that xsdlib is under Apache and MIT license
35 matches
Mail list logo
