Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:35:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:13:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > > > Do the buildd people read this list? How do we get this cleaned up? > > > > As far as I can t

Bug#296714: ITP: freepop -- game inspired by the classic Populous series

2005-02-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: freepop Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Brendon Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://freepop.sf.net/ * License : GPL Description : game inspired by the clas

Bug#296742: ITP: aspell-de-alt -- German dictionary for aspell (old spelling)

2005-02-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: aspell-de-alt Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Heinz Knutzen Björn Jacke * URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/de/ * License : GPL

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG [Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:10:57 -0800]: > >> ONCE IT'S CLEANED UP, what should I do to get the package rebuilt? >> Seems to me, I should requeue it. Nothing else is an advertised or >> reliable way. Even the @buildd.debian.org I'm now

Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch

2005-02-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But that's OK. Our amd64 users just use the Alioth site instead of our > wonderful mirror network, and track it as unstable. I mean, it's so much > more effective to have it all hitting alioth for download, right? Thought > so. Amd64 actualy has 14+ mirro

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Screwing up in the postrm of a package in Build-Depends is about the >> worst you can do to the current buildd. It is pretty sure to cripple >> them all. The inability of buildds to rebuild thei

Does this break binary compatability on 64bit architectures?

2005-02-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. Upstream of a library package that I maintain changed function prototypes in the followinf way: > > -int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, uint32_t index, char ** result, > +int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, unsigned int index, char ** result, > size_t * result_len); That is, 'u

Re: Does this break binary compatability on 64bit architectures?

2005-02-24 Thread Falk Hueffner
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> -int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, uint32_t index, char ** result, >> +int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, unsigned int index, char ** result, >> size_t * result_len); > > That is, 'uint32_t' was changed to 'unsigned int'. > > Does

ITP: ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.5mp - REINER SCT cyberJack pinpad/e-com USB chipcard reader driver

2005-02-24 Thread Alexander List
Hello folks, I just filed the following ITP intended to resolve Bug #203976. ---cut here--- Package: ctapi-cyberjack Version: 2.0.5mp Short desription: REINER SCT cyberJack pinpad/e-com USB chipcard reader driver Long description: This driver for the REINER SCT cyberJack pinpad/e-com USB family

Bug#296801: ITP: sblim-cmpi-params -- instrumentation providers for WBEM accessing kernel parameters

2005-02-24 Thread Rafal Lewczuk
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: sblim-cmpi-params Version : 1.2.3 Upstream Author : Gareth S. Bestor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sblim * License : Common Public License Description : instrumentation provider

Bug#296803: ITP: sblim-cmpi-sysfs -- instrumentation providers for WBEM accessing sysfs device tree

2005-02-24 Thread Rafal Lewczuk
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: sblim-cmpi-sysfs Version : 1.1.7 Upstream Author : Gareth S. Bestor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sblim * License : Common Public License Description : instrumentation providers

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:17:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> * Thomas Bushnell BSG [Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:13:42 -0800]: >> > Do the buildd people read this list? How do we get this cleaned up? >> That's not relevant, really. What matters is if they r

Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

2005-02-24 Thread Sascha Berkenkamp
Hi, I want to help the debian team and I also read debian.org/devel ! So I think I would like to help testing and debugging the debian system in order to help to fix some bugs in some programs or debian sepcific stuff. I'm not sure if I'm able to do this with mit taks but I'll try and learn. I'v

Re: Does this break binary compatability on 64bit architectures?

2005-02-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 05:53:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Hello. > > Upstream of a library package that I maintain changed function prototypes > in the followinf way: > > > > > -int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, uint32_t index, char ** result, > > +int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, un

Re: Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

2005-02-24 Thread Adam Majer
Sascha Berkenkamp wrote: >I use Debian unstable on my laptop, testing on my old PIII which runs >some server taks for my local net and a Debian stable on a Webserver. >I prefer to work on my old PIII, but I don't want to destroy my running >Debian. Should I install Debian on a second partition or

Re: Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

2005-02-24 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Quoting Sascha Berkenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I want to help the debian team and I also read debian.org/devel ! So I > think I would like to help testing and debugging the debian system in > order to help to fix some bugs in some programs or debian sepcific > stuff. I'm not sure if I'

Re: Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

2005-02-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Sascha Berkenkamp wrote: > Hi, > > I want to help the debian team and I also read debian.org/devel ! So I > think I would like to help testing and debugging the debian system in > order to help to fix some bugs in some programs or debian sepcific > stuff.

Bug#296810: ITP: owperlprovider -- another perl provider interface for OpenWBEM

2005-02-24 Thread Rafal Lewczuk
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: owperlprovider Version : 0.30 Upstream Author : Jason Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/config4gnu * License : GPL, Artistic Description : another perl provider interface for O

Re: Would like to remove blas/lapack/atlas2/lapack99 at some point

2005-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Hi Kevin! Of course, post-Sarge is just fine! Please excuse me if I implied otherwise. You and I have already coordinated on this. If memory serves, libmathlib1 is not the only issue. mpqc, ghemical, and tela are there too. I'm checking the BTS, and can't find the analogous wishlist bugs agai

Become a homeowner with low rates

2005-02-24 Thread Approved mortage
Hello, We tried contacting you a while ago about your low interest mort age rate. You have qualified for the lowest rate in years. You could get over $380,000 for as little as $500 a month! Ba(d credit? Doesn't matter, low rates are fixed no matter what! To get a free, no obli,gation consultation

Re: Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

2005-02-24 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi! [...] If you want to take this one step further, actually trying to crash an application in a reproducible way, or trying to narrow down a bug to a specific set of actions can be really helpful as well; for instance, if there's a bug that says something like 'If I run this application, it somet

Re: mplayer, the time has come

2005-02-24 Thread Sebastien NOEL
Hi, I have some questions about your package: * You removed libmpdvdkit2/ because US laws suck. Why don't you remove also libfaad2/ which is full of patents problems ? (according to /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/patents.txt.gz) * Why the "--disable-mencoder" in debian/rules ? * Why the "

Re: svn.debian.org: Automatically putting log message into debian/changelog?

2005-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: > I have thought about that before. However, I meant to implement it this > way: Parse debian/changelog locally, and use new entries as default for > Subversion's changelog. It would prevent debian/changelog to be > cluttered with entries such as "forgot to add file foo l

Re: Does this break binary compatability on 64bit architectures?

2005-02-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 20:52 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 05:53:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Upstream of a library package that I maintain changed function prototypes > > in the followinf way: > > > > > > > > -int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f,

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 05:10:57PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:41:46PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > That won't help, especially not in this case. Those

New Drug store Earnestine

2005-02-24 Thread Weldon Weiss
Refill Notification Ref: IT-94343548 Dear debian-i18n@lists.debian.org, Our automated system has identified that you most likely are ready to refill your recent online pharmaceutical order. To help you get your needed supply, we have sent this reminder notice. Please use the refill system http

Re: mplayer, the time has come

2005-02-24 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:08:42PM +0100, Sebastien NOEL wrote: > * You removed libmpdvdkit2/ because US laws suck. > Why don't you remove also libfaad2/ which is full of patents problems ? > (according to /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/patents.txt.gz) I hope that isn't a file with descriptions o

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think it would hurt if maintainers whose packages are in this state > would email the relevant @buildd.debian.org addresses and cc: > debian-release on the message -- now, rather than waiting for the buildds to > be fixed. Hopefully, this would

Re: ITP: ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.5mp - REINER SCT cyberJack pinpad/e-com USB chipcard reader driver

2005-02-24 Thread Norbert Preining
On Don, 24 Feb 2005, Alexander List wrote: > Package: ctapi-cyberjack > Version: 2.0.5mp Hi Alex! Good idea, but please send Reiner an email, I got 2.0.7 from them, so don't start wiht a old version! If you need a contact email, ask me by PM. If you need test dummys, here I am. After I have retu

High-quality custom logos and business identities

2005-02-24 Thread Terrell Slaughter
Your business lacks visual identity? Marketing efforts falling short? Invisible among a sea of competitors? You're on the right track for a solution - keep reading... Our professional designers specialize in the creation of custom logos and business/corporate identities. Our design needs to be s

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

2005-02-24 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:44:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > For example, if even *one* buildd maintainer doesn't requeue with some > kind of promptness, then the only way to deal with it will be to make > a new upload, which will force a recompile everywhere. This is only valid on arch