Hi Martin,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 04:47:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Based on the work of Kevin Mark (URL not available, sorry), I have
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.fig
> made a graph of the life cycle of a Debian package for inclusion
[Adeodato Simó]
> That is, a diff of the list of binary packages. Perhaps, one could
> colour red removed packages, and blue added ones.
Be carefull with using only color coding. This make it harder for
color blind and blind people to read the information.
While we are on the feature wishlis
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 18:59 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 22:52 +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > It would be nice if the page indicated which of the binary packages is new.
>
> The binary column indicates those created within the source package.
> Every source package on th
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:07:06PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > So what if we had two editions of libmysqlclient, one of them
> > ssl-enabled and the other - as currently - not? That would allow
> > using ssl whenever possible. I think that could be done, without
> > breaking things.
>
> That's
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 07:08:49PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * martin f. krafft:
>
> > Based on the work of Kevin Mark (URL not available, sorry), I have
> > made a graph of the life cycle of a Debian package for inclusion in
> > my forthcoming book (http://debianbook.info). You can find the
(reply to -devel unless answering on a topic more appropriate to one
of the other lists)
Several people have heard of my "Babelbox" demo machine which was
featured for the first time at Solutions Linux expo in Paris.
This demo machine is a Debian Installer demo which runs over and over,
changing
Bonjour,
Votre message a bien été reçu, mais il ne m'a pas encore été délivré car je
n'ai pas encore noté que vous m'envoyez des messages depuis cette adresse. J'ai
besoin de vérifier que cette adresse vous correspond bien. Aussi je vous prie
de bien vouloir faire "reply" sur ce message et me renv
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1908 +0100]:
> Interesting, thanks. I believe the --->O arrays are confusingly
> labled. "package installation" is probably a better choice. The
> difference between "package propagation" and "package upload" is
> not clear, at least to
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:22:20AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.6.1.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Having no mp3 encoder in the archive, due to possible patent problems, i
> believe it would be a wiser idea to have "music-encoder" as a virtual package
> than "mp3-e
Current d-i writes the following line to the beginning of /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost
Traditionally, this confuses some programs; at least pvm used to have
problems with this, and I'm fairly sure cfengine2 doesn't like it either, so
we've changed to
127.0.0.1
On Feb 13, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, one program has to be buggy here, but which? :-)
The first ones. 127.0.0.1 IS localhost.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Jonas,
I'm writing you again after my last email was not answered.
I would like to help you out packaging moin 1.3.x. Could you
please contact me on furter development of MoinMoin for Debian?
If not I will start creating a NMU.
--
Raphael Bossek
pgpgVD86x0i5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:30:11 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Current d-i writes the following line to the beginning of /etc/hosts:
>
>127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost
This is correct.
> Traditionally, this confuses some programs; at least pvm used to have
> problems with t
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:25:15PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> However, now we've suddenly discovered that _other_ programs get confused by
> this! In particular, if you use an NFSv4-patched mount, it does a
> gethostname() and resolves that, which returns 127.0.0.1, which in turn makes
>
to, 2005-02-10 kello 18:23 -0800, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham kirjoitti:
> hi. i want to help developing for debian.
> how should i proceed?
> i have experience with computer graphics and mathematical tools
> programming, but most interested in the computer graphics field, in
> which i'
su, 2005-02-13 kello 01:22 +0200, Jesus Climent kirjoitti:
> Having no mp3 encoder in the archive, due to possible patent problems, i
> believe it would be a wiser idea to have "music-encoder" as a virtual package
> than "mp3-encoder".
Wouldn't it be necessary for this to work for all music encode
Mark Brown writes:
> ...NIS needs to hand out the IP address of the machine...
Machines don't have IP numbers. Interfaces have IP numbers. Every machine
with one or more external interfaces has at least two: 127.0.0.1 for the
loopback interface and one for each external interface.
> Resolving t
Hi folks
I currently try to get gfs and the cluster infrastructure into a usable
state. One of the problems are the runlevel and sequence point settings
for each step. The whole thing should start before the daemons, bus this
will make it impossible to login into the system if the cluster is not
q
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Resolving the hostname is a standard method for obtaining an IP address
> for the machine
And pretty broken in a lot of the cases :) It is much better to retrieve
the local current IP address of the connection you are going to send the ip
(if it is neede
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:17:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your message has been received, but it hasn't been delivered to me yet. Since
> I
> don't have any record of your sending me mail from this address before, I need
> to verify that you're not a spammer. Please just hit 'Reply' and
Package: wnpp
Hi,
anyone who wants to work on iproute is greatly welcome, perhaps also as
co-maintainer (and I'm also willing to sponsor people). The reason I
intend to give the package away is that I'm not really the great
networking guy, but I'll try to give the package a warm home till I can
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 11:21:09AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > ...NIS needs to hand out the IP address of the machine...
> Machines don't have IP numbers. Interfaces have IP numbers. Every machine
Actually, that's not quite the case (as a number of users of Linux's ARP
i
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 11:21:09AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Mark Brown writes:
>
> > > ...NIS needs to hand out the IP address of the machine...
>
> > Machines don't have IP numbers. Interfaces have IP numbers. Every machine
>
> Actually, that's no
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:34:01 +0100]:
> [Adeodato Simó]
> > That is, a diff of the list of binary packages. Perhaps, one could
> > colour red removed packages, and blue added ones.
> Be carefull with using only color coding. This make it harder for
> color blind and blind p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dvbsnoop
Version : 1.3.77
Upstream Author : Rainer Scherg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dvbsnoop.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : DVB / MPEG stream analyze
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:51:44AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I know you Debian people think it's just hilarious when users try to
> apt-get upgrade during the period after when the Packages files
> arrive on the mirrors, but before the packages they describe have
> fully arrived.
> "Haw haw haw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alban browaeys skrev:
| In october you told:
|
|> Searching Google for "xsession umask" will give you some hints.
|>
|>
|>
|>> /etc/login.defs explicitly indicates that it is
|>> "Configuration control definitions for the login package",
|>> and many of
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One question:
Brian> I asked about this a while ago on debian-devel and was told
Brian> (IIRC) that a major rewrite was happening in order to make
Brian> Povray DFSG compliant.
Brian> Is this still the case?
Two answers:
>>
On Sunday 13 February 2005 18:47, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I currently try to get gfs and the cluster infrastructure into a usable
> state. One of the problems are the runlevel and sequence point settings
> for each step.
Take a look at the NFS packages, while I'd venture that PCMCIA NICs are
irre
> "Ron" == Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ron> Rules to live by:
Ron> Look before you leap.
Isn't the modern version:
"Leap before you look..."
(and then contact your lawyer[1]...)
Ron> Measure twice, cut once.
Cut twice, measure once.
Ron> Google it!
Loose it!
> "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Goswin> zsync has the option of looking into gziped files and
Goswin> rsync them as if they would be ungziped (while still just
Goswin> downloading chunks of the gziped file). Its a bit more
Goswin> complex algorith
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alain Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: steam
Version : 1.5.12
Upstream Author : open sTeam-Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.open-steam.org/
* License : GPL
Description : environment for cooper
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Curious; maybe the FAQ is wrong?
It's been a while since I looked at it; maybe the maintainers, and thus
attitudes, have changed (for the worse). Alternatively, perhaps the
loudest mouths on the mailing list are not representative of the
project's long-term
все кулики и кулички без исключения бегают очень
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 10/02/2005
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libformatr-ruby
Version : 1.09
Upstream Author : Paul Rubel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://formatr.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL or Ruby's other licensing terms (see
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Goswin> zsync has the option of looking into gziped files and
> Goswin> rsync them as if they would be ungziped (while still just
> Goswin> downloading chunks of the gziped fil
> Why do people think it's acceptable for their stupid anti-spam measures
> to inconvenience others?
I am indirectly responsible for M. Mescam message.
He was BCC'ed to my original mail annoucing Babelbox documentation (I
had my own reasons for the BCC). However, as I did setup the Reply-To
fiel
On 20050214T071408+0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Debian address first, his automated greylisting system automatically
> answered and did so using the Reply-To field.
Then it is broken. Automatic mails should be sent to the envelope
sender, unless explicitly asked otherwise.
--
Antti-Juhani K
38 matches
Mail list logo
