* Matthew Palmer:
>> As a user, I think this is very convenient. The ability to switch
>> back to a known-to-work version by tweaking a few configuration files
>> is reassuring, even if you've tested the new software version on an
>> indepedent machine.
>
> So archive bloat is not a problem for y
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:04:33AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matthew Palmer:
>
> >> As a user, I think this is very convenient. The ability to switch
> >> back to a known-to-work version by tweaking a few configuration files
> >> is reassuring, even if you've tested the new software versio
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:47:50PM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > > * Package name: btexmms
> >
> > xmms plugins would be better named xmms- (btexmms for the
> > source should be fine though)
> >
>
> So xmms-btexmms would be better ?
Yep. Just take a look at other xmms plugins.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Mirrors are kind of important for a distribution
> the size of Debian.
Hmm.. do we have numbers on d/l on all/some mirrors? I mean debian is not
that popular. So if we have a high download rate, this is mostly homegrown.
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSC
On Thursday 03 February 2005 03:03, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > As a DD, you can ls /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on merkel, daily
> > synced. Beware, there are 2826 files in there atm, so ls via grep
> > or something.
>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 03:03, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > As a DD, you can ls /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on merkel, daily
> > > synced. Be
Re: Steve Langasek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link
> > > time reference (/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.10)
>
> > I don't know this problem is "missing GLIBC_2.2 symbols" issue. It
> > does not clear Christoph's problematic archit
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 06.35, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>
>> I think you meant to ask, "Why would anyone want to execute the C
>> library?"
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/libc.so.6
>
> Ok, this is off topic for this thread, bu
On Thursday 03 February 2005 14:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 03:03, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar
wrote:
> > > > As a DD, you can
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:45:56AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > And while we are on the subject, what's with NEW not being
> > > processed? Or are we again in the usual "I'll process any package
> > > that I feel like processing" situation?
>
> > Is it not just that there's too few hands to
Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 14:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into unstable is NOT
> > something that should be a priority when we're trying to get the RC
> > bug count down in preparation
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 06.35, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> I think you meant to ask, "Why would anyone want to execute the C
>>> library?"
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:46:03PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2005-02-03 03:15:41, schrieb Sam Watkins:
> >
> > > 1. People (including children) will get a nasty surprise when they
> > >choose to download all the comics
On Thursday 03 February 2005 16:05, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 14:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into unstable is
> > > NOT something that should be a priorit
Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 16:05, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
>> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 14:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > > Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into uns
Hi, all.
Maybe I choose wrong list, but I didn't find more suitable list for such
mail.
I wrote small scripts which should help to build chroot enviroment. I
know already exists such things like 'makejail'. But I wrote my own
version of 'how to chroot specified packages under debian'.
This collect
For some reason this ITP didn't get cc'd to debian devel, so here it is:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346
Regards,
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. So maybe ftp-masters shouldn't accept NEW packages, but accept new
> binary packages (from existing source). This would allow me to close some
> "unfortunatelly" non-critical bugs, and improve overall sarge quality.
>
> I'm sure that I'm no
Hi,
as I understand myself as someone aware of the support problems of
software problems, I would like to point to 2 problems:
1. the Debian Kernel is a bit different from the kernel.org Kernel;
example: at work we used the Apani VPN client, which did work under all
kind of RedHat/SuSE kernel,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>
> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>
That is simply not true. This statement is repeated all the time but
nobody ever was able to
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok. So maybe ftp-masters shouldn't accept NEW packages, but accept new
>> binary packages (from existing source). This would allow me to close some
>> "unfortunatelly" non-critical bugs, and improve
Re: Sergei I. Kononov in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wrote small scripts which should help to build chroot enviroment. I
> know already exists such things like 'makejail'. But I wrote my own
> version of 'how to chroot specified packages under debian'.
What's the difference to makejail and debootstrap
On 10189 March 1977, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I thought about writing something like this myself. But I didn't,
>> because the logical answer would be "check out
>> http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak and start working", and I won't
>> be able to do that...
> And it is a mess to configure
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Its just not out of NEW atm.
And now we're back to the original subject ;)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> > Why there isn't there already a rsync method for apt is probably a
>> > mystery nobody ever will solve.
>>
>> It is not wanted due to rsync causing excessive server load.
>>
> That is simply not true. This statement is
On Thu, Feb 03 at 20:23:20 (+0100), Christoph Berg wrote:
> What's the difference to makejail and debootstrap?
1. Created chroot enviroment use less disk space, and does not
include not needed files/dirs (like: passwd, chown, chmod or files in
fileutils package etc)
Creates 'chroot', not another
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into unstable is NOT
> something that should be a priority when we're trying to get the RC bug
> count down in preparation of a release. Show me that there are enough
> people working on release-critical issues for sarge,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> reply (that is what I get roughly) to the server would waste 75 hours
> on waiting for the initial three-way handshake for a connect. And
> another 50 hours for the round-robin sending the name of a file a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> reply (that is what I get roughly) to the server would waste 75 hours
>> on waiting for the initial three-way handshake for a connect. And
>> another 50 hours f
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> It works and is available from dak.ganneff.de. And the packages is
> used on several archives now. Its just not out of NEW atm.
So, let's *guess* ...
* ftp-master surely knows about the license on that one, so it's not a
"
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
* it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of the
pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies, ignores
/chapter and verse/ of policy, ...), so we can safely rule that one
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
> > > which
> > > requires no imprimatur from the DPL, before you start throwing
> > > packages that have never even been tested by their maintainer at us
> > > faster
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:44:19PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> Would it be an idea (post-Sarge?) to not let packages automatically
> propagate from sid to testing after X days. Instead, the responsible
> maintainer would have to explicitly tag a package as 'ready for
> testing' as opposed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: missingpy
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : Not yet
* License : GPL
Description : Python interface and libraries for Haskell
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of the
>pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies, ignores
>/chapter and verse/ of policy, ...), so we can safely rule that one
>out
I ha
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:21:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of the
> > pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies, ignores
> > /chapter and v
On 1 February 2005 at 14:46, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-15 11:51]:
| > Please CC me on follow-ups to debian-devel, or email me directly if
| > you have any interest. I should follow up with RFA and O bug reports
| > over the next few weeks, but doing
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:21:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of the
> > pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies, ign
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I know is that every time an ftpmaster processes a batch of NEW
> packages, a percentage of them wind up in testing with serious bugs for
> failing to declare build-dependencies, and then the release team has to
> track these bugs.
>
> Since the te
> "Don" == Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Don> 2. Should Debian publish content I disagree with which is
Don> DFSG free?
I am going to write a DFSG script that will download photos I have
taken from my website, and display them at random on the users screen.
There are no p
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Brian May wrote:
> > "Don" == Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Don> 2. Should Debian publish content I disagree with which is
> Don> DFSG free?
>
> I really think we need to draw the line somewhere.
We do draw the line somewhere currently:
1) Mus
41 matches
Mail list logo
