* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041130 11:46]:
> Should this be moved to debian-legal?
No, to -curiosa.
SCNR,
Alexander
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:58:17PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > > operates?
> > >
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:26:50AM +0100, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am 2004-12-02 18:11:03, schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
>
> > The Bible is illegal to distribute in the most populous nation
> > in the world.
>
> Not only this, because the "Old Testament" glorifies the genoc
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:29:53PM -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:28:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Because he's an idiot. Can we move on to something on-topic?
>
> Fuck you.
You're being offensive, you should not be included in Debian.
Mi
Scripsit Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> it in the first place).
How would th
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:12:53PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:29:53PM -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:28:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Because he's an idiot. Can we move on to something on-topic?
> >
> > Fuc
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:18:12 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what this has to do with Gnome or anything I said.
Maybe its just me -- but your statement about selecting a preferred
package over any old package that provides [insert whatever] to
satisfy a depen
> > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> >
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
>
> How is that an advantage of use?
Well
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:30:05PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> > >
> > > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
>
Scripsit Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Meanwhile, what's
> the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
even have to be depended on.
--
Henning Makholm "It will be useful
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:10:01AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Meanwhile, what's
> > the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
>
> Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
> even have to be de
Hi fellow debianista,
the package in question has not yet been accepted.
For a pacakge to be accepted, here is conditions some have mentioned:
1) dfsg-free
2) can not be sexist
3) has to be able to be mirrored by all mirrors based on the laws of the
location of the server
4) can not offend someone'
201 - 212 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
