On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:44:35PM -0500, Thomas Bliesener arranged a set of
bits into the following:
> Almost the whole Debian website meets the HTML standards except some
> online documentation which seems to be a problem of debiandoc2html
> (#188117).
>
> In a quick survey I found more package
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Tha
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 09:47:59PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> So I made sysvinit Pre-Depend on initscripts. But that results
> in the following installation problem:
> # dpkg -i *.deb
Pre-Depends aren't resolved by a single invocation of dpkg -i
(whereas Depends are). This is why you u
On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 01:08, Colin Walters wrote:
> I just installed "laptop-net", becuase it looked similar to something
> I'd like to work on.
You might want to look at ifupdown-roaming too
http://panopticon.csustan.edu/thood/ifupdown-roaming.html
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity wishlist
BDB http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html> is Berkeley DB interface
for Ruby. libdb3-ruby provides BDB which links to libdb-3.so.
libdb-ruby is already provided. It has Bug#154727. libdb3-ruby is
solution for the situation of the bug. I also intend to package
libdb{2
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:42:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:31:44PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> Hardly, there are many RC bugs or FTBFS bugs in those. I think the main
> issue is that the PTS does not show the list of packages holding up. IT
> is not as easy, since th
* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030417 03:30]:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:10:58PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> > > We have at least three parallel menu systems around: the Debian Menu,
> > > the Gnome Foot Menu and the KDE menu.
> > We have one menu system: the Debian menu.
> > And we h
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:21:41PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> Anyway, now that I've done that... back to your actual interest:
> ocaml is also being recurred:
> i386: libpgsql-ocaml-dev, libsdl-ocaml, libsdl-ocaml-dev, ocaml-libs
>
> From sources:
> libpgsql-ocaml<== Unstable version bre
On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > I consider a proper fix is to redefine the configuration files so that
> > they can be parsed. I have learned, the
Hello all,
I just noticed that not all packages in sid do provide md5 checksums
for the files they contains.
What should be done against this ? Shall we file bugreports against
all packages that we can found, or perhaps lintian should check this ?
Thanks,
--
/// Stephane Jourdois /"
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, i personnaly think that in some case it would be much simpler to
> _remove_ the packages from testing, and let the new versions enter
> testing as they can.
Yes, this generally happens. It's not really a good thing though -- it
oops, forgot to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: ITP: xpi2deb -- Mozilla's xpi package converter
Date: Thursday 17 April 2003 11:47
From: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 131404 ITP: xpi2deb -- Mozilla's x
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:33:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i personnaly think that in some case it would be much simpler to
> > _remove_ the packages from testing, and let the new versions enter
> > testing as they can.
>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Stephane Jourdois wrote:
> I just noticed that not all packages in sid do provide md5 checksums
> for the files they contains.
>
> What should be done against this ? Shall we file bugreports against
> all packages that we can found, or perhaps lintian shou
Considering the libvorbis case, what needs to happen is the
remaining packages that depend on libvorbis0 be recompiled
against libvorbis0a.
Then, optionally, remove the packages from testing.
I would have thought that libvorbis0 and dependent packages merit a removal
from testing because woody
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > > I consider a proper fix is to redefine the conf
The festival speech syntesizer needs at least one voice file. I'd like to
use a virtual package named "festival-voice" so that people cannot install
it without one, which is a problem (see the above bug).
Policy requires discussing new virtual packages on d-d...
--
Matthias
Hello
Due to lack of time I have a hard time to maintain the
harden-localflaws, harden-3rdflaws and harden-remoteflaws
packages. Therefore I have split out theese three pacakges
from the main harden source package to its own package
harden-flaws.
It should be easier to maintain then.
So now to m
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:05:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:33:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Well, i personnaly think that in some case it would be much simpler to
> > > _remove_ the packages fro
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:56:22PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Considering the libvorbis case, what needs to happen is the
> remaining packages that depend on libvorbis0 be recompiled
> against libvorbis0a.
The only packages that still dep on libvorbis0 in unstable/i386 seem to be:
bitco
* Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-09 23:08]:
> I talked to an AMD guy a while back, and he said we could get access
> to machines if he sign certain NDAs. He did not really say what kind
> of access though.
I sent e-mail to AMD about getting a dedicated box for Debian a day
before this
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:32:51PM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
Hi,
> The package will be uploaded once the final fonts are released, which will
> probably happen sometime next month.
Well, didn't quite happen in March, but all the improvements over the
beta version were very well worth the
> > OTOH, xml config files (like fontconfig's config) could be losslessly
> > parsed
> > through xslt processing...
>
> Much like any other config file can be losslessly parsed by processing
> them. That's not really very helpful.
However, it could be something of a "standard" for configuration
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 April 2003 02:32, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:21, Chris Hanson wrote:
> > > > I'd rather fix this properly; what you suggest is a workaround. What
> > > > I consider a
Hi,
version 0.7 of debbuggtk is now in the Debian repository. This is a
set of tools (bugwatcher, bugviewer and buglister) to help manage Debian
bug reports. This is useful because:
- Bug listings can be filtered, so it should be easier to find
particular reports. This includes searching titles,
On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 06:47, Mike Hommey wrote:
> OTOH, xml config files (like fontconfig's config) could be losslessly parsed
> through xslt processing...
I know, but I haven't done this because expat (AFAICS) doesn't provide a
command-line tool to do XSLT, and Depend:ing on xsltproc (which use
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:17:41AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:05:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:33:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Well, i personnaly think that i
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:34:36PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> Debian can't legally distribute such an info document. Because the
> GFDL is incompatible with the GPL, it is prohibited to even
> create an info document from GFDL'd texinfo source. See #183860.
Hrm, if that's the case, we can't
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sleuthkit
Version : 1.61
Upstream Author : Brian Carrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sleuthkit.sourceforge.net/
* License : GNU GPL & IBM PUBLIC LICENSE VERSION 1.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: autopsy
Version : 1.71
Upstream Author : Brian Carrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : GPL 2
Description : Graphical interface to sleuth
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 04:16:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:34:36PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > Debian can't legally distribute such an info document. Because the
> > GFDL is incompatible with the GPL, it is prohibited to even
> > create an info document from
hi:
my name is arezoo. i want learn perl language programming but i have not its software in my computer.
whould u mind guidding me? what i must do?
im iranian
i want download it from internet.
thanks alot
keep in touch
arezooDo you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:11:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I CCed you the bugreport where i explain everything, but the packages are :
> libpgsql-ocaml
> ocamlsdl
> These are the source packages.
You missed:
ocaml-core | 3.06.3 | unstable | all
ocaml-libs | 3.06.3 | u
Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> version 0.7 of debbuggtk is now in the Debian repository. This is a
> set of tools (bugwatcher, bugviewer and buglister) to help manage Debian
> bug reports. This is useful because:
Err, it requires some non-free software, jre 1.4 that is. Too bad
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:31:21PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Yes; you were. I'm focussing on gcc and perl and such things at the
> > moment, and as of yet no one else is really able to do anything about this
> > stuff while I'm busy; hopefully both those things will c
Hi!
I've recently upgraded my Woody-Servers according to the latest
libc6 security update (DSA-282), and it seems that services were _not_
reloaded by the post-install-script!?
More detailed information:
When investigating the situation, I found out the following (if I read
everything right, ple
Anthony Towns writes:
> Yes; you were. I'm focussing on gcc and perl and such things at the
> moment, and as of yet no one else is really able to do anything about this
> stuff while I'm busy; hopefully both those things will change soon enough.
and maybe python ...
AFAICS there are two issues:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:03:37 +, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Err, it requires some non-free software, jre 1.4 that is. Too bad.
>
Even worse, the blackdown people seem somewhat nonresponsive when people
ask whether there's going to be a LinuxPPC port of 1.4 any time soon (or
even "at all").
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-17
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package name: mudnames
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://lightside.eresmas.com/mudnames-1.6.tar.g
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:23:06AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:51:59PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show rhdb-admin
> > Package: rhdb-admin
>
> What is wrong here?
>
> > rhdb-admin
> > echo $?
> 1
>
> I assu
Hi,
Did you really investigate tetex-bin? It is completely
irrelevant with the current problem you claimed, I believe.
It doesn't modify any conffile but only asks how to set
permissions of a file and/or asks which hyphenation pattern
to load.
Further,
The first thing it asked me was whet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: oilwar
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Jarmo Hekkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.2ndpoint.fi/projektit/oilwar.html
* License : GPL
Description : Defend your country from oil-thirsty invaders
[ forgot to CC my last message here to -devel ]
On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 21:28, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
> Date: 17 Apr 2003 20:32:41 -0400
>
> > reopen 189370
> > thanks
>
> sigh.
I won't reopen i
At Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:28:02 +0200,
Markus Amersdorfer wrote:
> I've recently upgraded my Woody-Servers according to the latest
> libc6 security update (DSA-282), and it seems that services were _not_
> reloaded by the post-install-script!?
>
> More detailed information:
>
> When investigating th
From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: 17 Apr 2003 21:56:00 -0400
> You don't understand Debconf. It is a cache, not a registry. I should
> be able to rm -rf /var/cache/debconf/config.dat *at any time*. If I do
> that, since you
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> The festival speech syntesizer needs at least one voice file. I'd like to
> use a virtual package named "festival-voice" so that people cannot install
> it without one, which is a problem (see the above bug).
>
> Policy requires discussing new virtua
46 matches
Mail list logo
