Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:52:01PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > gnome 1 probably is not going to be in sarge, so the difference > > between gnome 1 and gnome 2 arent going to matter to someone > > installing sarge. > > But some peopl

Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:03:35AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > But some people do deliberately "apt-cache search GNOME 2" to find new > > GTK+2.0 based software that they want to try out. > > but that is the wrong way to do it. instead, try: > > $ grep-available -s Package -F Depends libgnom

Re: Bug#171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

Andrew Lau wrote: All the more reason for a GNOME subpolicy I guess so there'd be less of a point to argue about this. I'd glady follow policy (even a draft one) anyday, but if it's lacking, convention rules. Especially when the only difference is an extra digit in the description.

Re: [Agnubis] Packaging Agnubis for Debian GNU/Linux

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:32:56AM +0100, Rapha?l Bordet wrote: > However, this is avaible on this apt's uri: > deb http://debian.linuxfr.net/ ./ > deb-src http://debian.linuxfr.net/ ./ > > I've started diacanvas2 but I've got a new job so I'm busy a lot. > That's all. I'm just thinking we can mak

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

* Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021130 18:43]: > Huh? If I change the text of the standard, I have changed the standard! > For example, if I have : > 0332;COMBINING LOW LINE;Mn;220;NSM;N;NON-SPACING UNDERSCORE > and change this to > 0332;NON-COMBINING LOW LINE;Mn;220;NSM;N;SPACING UND

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 06:58:56PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote: > > >I'm with Joey on this; last time I tried to find Debian .iso images, it > > >was a nightmare. In fact I couldn't find an official woody iso anywhere. > > This is the way of mirror operators to tell you that you should really > >

Re: [Agnubis] Packaging Agnubis for Debian GNU/Linux

Le dim 01/12/2002 à 07:26, Andrew Lau a écrit : > It's great to see you making progress on your ITP. I'll take a > look at the package within a few days and if it's good enough for > Debian or needs some minor touch-ups, then I'll put in some effort in > finding you a sponsor for it. Do you c

Sponsorship request: tsclient-0.56

Hey everyone, I've finished packaging tsclient 0.56 and it's waiting for someone to sponsor it at . Free from Lintian errors, but it seems to be incorrectly warning about my debian-menu xpm as having too many colours even though I've followed the menu instr

$B=O=w$+$*$j$N!H$*$9$9$a!I(B$B$h$s!*!*(B

$B=O=w!!$+$*$j!!$N!!!H$*$9$9$a!I!!$h$s!*!*(B $B$"[EMAIL PROTECTED]>R2p$7$^$9(B $BB>[EMAIL PROTECTED]($C$A%^%K%e%"%k$d(B $BC&$.$?$F$N%Q!{!{%#!([EMAIL PROTECTED]|1_(B (B (Bhttp://www.zero-city.com/galoo/index.html$B!!(B

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Saturday 30 November 2002 16:48, Russell Coker wrote: [snipped rant and threats] > ... if such messages continue. You misunderstood the way such things work, you only have to confirm once that you intended to send a message. Of course, people should add automated systems like the BTS to their

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 22:42, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > On Saturday 30 November 2002 16:48, Russell Coker wrote: > [snipped rant and threats] > > > ... if such messages continue. > > You misunderstood the way such things work, you only have to confirm once > that you intended to send a message. Of cour

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: You misunderstood the way such things work, you only have to confirm once that you intended to send a message. Still too much. If someone initiates a communication, they should make sure they can get the reply. Of course, people sho

Re: Sponsorship request: tsclient-0.56

On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 12:46, Andrew Lau wrote: > Hey everyone, > I've finished packaging tsclient 0.56 and it's waiting for > someone to sponsor it at . Free from > Lintian errors, but it seems to be incorrectly warning about my > debian-menu xpm as having to

Re: RFC for 'Request for Sponsorship' (RFS)

Dear Rob, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:00:58PM +, Rob Bradford wrote: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2002/debian-mentors-200211/msg00276.html I agree that we definitely need an official protocol/place for filing Request for Sponsors (RFS) and to avoid unnecessary cross-posting.

Re: RFC for 'Request for Sponsorship' (RFS)

* Andrew Lau | I agree that we definitely need an official protocol/place for | filing Request for Sponsors (RFS) and to avoid unnecessary | cross-posting. I suggest that there also needs to be clear guidelines | as to what idle period would be long enough to warrant a repeat or | escalatio

中国网络电话岁末优惠酬宾！

Title: Untitled Document 使用"网络电话"拨打国际长途电话或发送国际传真仅需0.32元/分钟,单机使用拨打全球可节省95%的话费,互联网时代，您还在使用费用昂贵的 "IP" 电话拨打国际长途及发送国际传真吗? Yap网络电话凭借五项国际顶尖技术(近端回声拟制、IP高速打包等通讯技术等)消除网络时延与噪音,话音清晰可媲美IP电话及电信IDD. 安装使用像普通电话一样简单.每月可为您公司节省数千元的国际长途话费及国际传

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > The people who run such stupid filters misunderstand the way the > Internet works. Maybe you should do a short research on the user of this mail handling program before saying such. > If you have to send an extra confirmation messag

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 19:19, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > > The people who run such stupid filters misunderstand the way the > > Internet works. > > Maybe you should do a short research on the user of this mail handling > program before saying s

Re: opening -private archives

Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Which question? Where? >> | 0. What is Debian's (current) approach to non-free software? Why? >> The "Why?" is not publicly documented, but the genesis of the Social >> Contract might answer this question

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:13:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Maybe the one in Austria, because it's the top of that list of mirrors. (I thought it would be clear that Austria is at the top because the list is sorted alphabetically... I am aware of the problem with people who click the first link t

Re: Bug#171176: python2.2 2.2.2-2 version number confuses me

Maybe an aspirin could help as well ;-) Maybe somebody should make two NMUs now ... Ministero della Cultura Popolare writes: > Package: python2.2 > Version: 2.2.2-2 > Severity: minor > > Reading the name of the package followed by the version number confuses > me. As you can see: > >

subscribe

subscribe

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > > The people who run such stupid filters misunderstand the way the > > Internet works. > > Maybe you should do a short research on the user of this mail handling > progra

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

Josip Rodin: > (I thought it would be clear that Austria is at the top because the list is > sorted alphabetically... ...in English. The list is still sorted with Austria first in all the other pages, even when it makes little or no sense at all. (my favourite example is of course the Swedish tr

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:41:23PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: > > (I thought it would be clear that Austria is at the top because the list is > > sorted alphabetically... > > ...in English. The list is still sorted with Austria first in all the > other pages, even when it makes little or no sens

Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message

"Gerrit Pape" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:35:28PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: >> The people who run such stupid filters misunderstand the way the >> Internet works. > > Maybe you should do a short research on the user of this mail handling > program before saying such.

KWANZAA MUSIC OF NEW ORLEANS

We invite you to hear a collection of New Orleans Kwanzaa Music presented for your enjoyment by Bill Summers. http://www.essenceofkwanzaa.com

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I never read ISO C In this case it's a bad idea to write C programs. You should use a programming language where the standardization committee fought with ISO to publish the text of the standard under a free (even libre) license. ;-) > Are databas

Packages to run kernel 2.4.x on potato (release 27)

I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.19 on a Debian 2.2r7 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information. The updated kernel packages contain a fix for a i386 DoS attack that allows every user to crash the computer [2]. If you run older kernels on a computer where y

How to fetch proper source for libc

I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~...coastal/ssem > apt-cache policy libc6 libc6: Installed: 2.3.1-5 Candidate: 2.3.1-5 Version Table: *** 2.3.1-5 0 500 file: unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.5

Package with non-free build-depends

Hi all, The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use "dot" to create some of the images for the documentation. Problem with that is that "dot" is from the g

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). Have a look at #165603 for a patch that should fix it. > However, when I fetch source I get version 2.2.5 What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like? -- Colin Wats

Re: Package with non-free build-depends

Chris Leishman writes: > Hi all, > > The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen > documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc > package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use "dot" to create some > of the images for the documentation. Problem wi

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > However, when I fetch source I get version 2.2.5 > > What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like? Duh. Right.

Re: Package with non-free build-depends

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or > else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff > file. Adapt your rules in a way, that it can fall back to the > precompiled version, if the

Re: How to validate Debian woody CDs?

On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 07:51, Jochen Voss wrote: > Is this a good way to check wheter the CDs are official > Debian CDs? http://http.us.debian.org/dists/woody/Release http://http.us.debian.org/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/Packages I think debootstrap may even do this verification for you, and you

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). Hmm. What makes you think that this patch fixes a memory leak? I ask because the patch appears to deal

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 04:53:51PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). > > Hmm. What makes you think that th

Re: apt-src (was deb-src!)

> > Don't fool with the Debian architecture name. It > > might be better to > > install pentium-builder instead. > > > > got that installed I pretty sure. Actually I was > talking rubbish about it building against i386 arch, > dunno why I thought that. It builds i686 fine. > > However the othe

Re: Package with non-free build-depends

Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or > > else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff > > file. Adapt your rules in a way, that

拨打国际长途省钱的好方法

Title: 中国地区拨打00886 中国地区拨打00886-940394064不分时段国际长途电话免费转接服务  台湾国际长途转接台让您尽情享受费用低廉，音质清晰的电话服务。 可由中国大陆地区拨打 → 英，法，得，意，日，美，加，等40个国家的国际长途通达地区列表 使用方法如下： 台湾转接台提供了两个特服号：00886949869023和00886940394064如果您在中国地区拨打国际长途，请先拨通其中一个特服号，可听到语音提示:“请直拨电话号码”这时就输入您要拨的号码，但要将所拨号码的00字头省去，例：您要拨的被叫号码

拨打国际长途省钱的好方法

Title: 中国地区拨打00886 中国地区拨打00886-940394064不分时段国际长途电话免费转接服务  台湾国际长途转接台让您尽情享受费用低廉，音质清晰的电话服务。 可由中国大陆地区拨打 → 英，法，得，意，日，美，加，等40个国家的国际长途通达地区列表 使用方法如下： 台湾转接台提供了两个特服号：00886949869023和00886940394064如果您在中国地区拨打国际长途，请先拨通其中一个特服号，可听到语音提示:“请直拨电话号码”这时就输入您要拨的号码，但要将所拨号码的00字头省去，例：您要拨的被叫号码

Mozilla Calendar?

is anyone planning on packaging Mozilla.org's Calendar program? It requires Mozilla 1.2a (1.2 is in Unstable but I don't know about 1.2a). It looks promising and hope someone packages it. If not, I might take it up since I think asd-ng (which I'm suppose

拨打国际长途省钱的好方法

Title: 中国地区拨打00886 中国地区拨打00886-940394064不分时段国际长途电话免费转接服务  台湾国际长途转接台让您尽情享受费用低廉，音质清晰的电话服务。 可由中国大陆地区拨打 → 英，法，得，意，日，美，加，等40个国家的国际长途通达地区列表 使用方法如下： 台湾转接台提供了两个特服号：00886949869023和00886940394064如果您在中国地区拨打国际长途，请先拨通其中一个特服号，可听到语音提示:“请直拨电话号码”这时就输入您要拨的号码，但要将所拨号码的00字头省去，例：您要拨的被叫号码

Re: Mozilla Calendar?

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:29:28PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote: > If not, I might take it up since I think asd-ng (which I'm supposed to > be maintaining) is in limbo at present. what is asd-ng? -- gram pgpPEqEM5v6xH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mozilla Calendar?

On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 23:29, Carl B. Constantine wrote: > It requires Mozilla 1.2a (1.2 is in Unstable but I don't know about > 1.2a). It works on 1.2a and higher. 1.2 is higher than 1.2a (a=alpha), so you're set. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part