* Yven Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021122 10:43]:
> Y'see Branden, at least the "get rid of Branden's evil jokes" GR would easily
> be overthrown :-)
/me notes that he is generally laughing out loud at most of them.
Sadly, my coworkers think I'm going insane rather than laughing at a
good joke. :
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:36:13AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:31:46AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > You need to keep track (at both ends of the link) of the last
> > sequence number sent.
>
> can we perhaps set up a mailinglist or discuss this on the mailinglist of
>
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:37:02 +
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Turning on IDE DMA is a performance improvement of around a factor of
> 6-10 (2-3Mb/sec -> 25-40Mb/sec), for disk-bound operations. You can
> get *more* than a 6-times improvement in performance?
Well, no. But t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:37:16PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 14:07, Michael Cardenas wrote:
>
> > I have to admit, I sure would love to have gnome2. Last time I tried
> > to install my machine, the upgrade scripts failed miserably,
>
> I don't understand why people are s
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 06:57:45PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> > Why not http://www.debian.org/devel, under "Projects"?
> You're right! D-I is (I think?) official, and important project, and it
> should have homepage in debian.org, not in "something people" on
> people.d.o. Am I right?
>
> > * Abandon non-free entirely, but have SPI sponsor a apt-gettable server
> > (third-party.debian.org) for third-party developers to put .deb packages
> > on.
> I'd already raised this possibility before (moving non-free out of Debian
> but to some other SPI project). It doesn't have to be
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 08:34:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:25:23AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > would be a positive improvement over the status quo); I wonder what Debian
> > developers who support non-free think of these ideas?
>
> It must feel good to total
* Michael Cardenas
| So should we do this? Who would I speak to about that?
ask on -www to be added to the webwml group.
| Also, does anyone want to volunteer to translate the page for me?
| Tollef, want to do the german?
Since I'm a Norwegian and not a German, I'd prefer not to. ;) My
Germa
> Since I'm a Norwegian and not a German, I'd prefer not to. ;) My
> German is quite rusty.
If it will only the page, which is now, I can translate it into Polish,
but I haven't debian-account yet.
btw, official debian polish translator AFAIR is porridge?
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds li
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 16:16, Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > EVMS support has been added.. I played with it a little, but it was
> > broken because it was compiled with readline support, while no
> > readline libraries were in the archive. I've just played a
Hi,
I've got a problem with a package I maintain building from source on the
Alpha architecture.
I'm still going through the NM process, and I believe that once I become a
DD I'll get access to a Debian Project Alpha. In the meantime, does
someone have an Alpha that they can give me temporary ac
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:18:15AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: info
> Version: 4.1-2
> Severity: normal
(..)
> Therefore folks should make top Info nodes with proper headers.
> How about a debian Info pages policy.
>
Agreed. Please propose content for such a section in the DDP
p
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:47:36AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: tsclient
> Version : 0.56
> Upstream Author : Erick Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kyle Herbert <[EMAIL PR
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:32:47PM -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> > > Why not http://www.debian.org/devel, under "Projects"?
> > You're right! D-I is (I think?) official, and important project, and it
> > should have homepage in debian.org, not in "something people" on
> > people.d.o. Am I righ
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:04:59PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with a package I maintain building from source on the
> Alpha architecture.
>
> I'm still going through the NM process, and I believe that once I become a
> DD I'll get access to a Debian Project A
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:07:35AM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> > Since I'm a Norwegian and not a German, I'd prefer not to. ;) My
> > German is quite rusty.
> If it will only the page, which is now, I can translate it into Polish,
> but I haven't debian-account yet.
>
> btw, official debia
Would an Alpha in UK be OK??
Running Debian unstable and potentially on 24/7
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Pollock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 11:04 AM
Subject: Need access to an Alpha
In Debian (woody and sid) we have multiple firewall configuration
packages: iptables, firestarter, gfcc, knetfilter, easy-firewall,
firewall-easy to mention a few. All of them make use of the kernel
firewalling code. However, if a user installs more than one of them he
might get into _Big_ trouble
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:18:15AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Package: info
> > Version: 4.1-2
> > Severity: normal
> (..)
> > Therefore folks should make top Info nodes with proper headers.
> > How about a debia
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:04:59PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with a package I maintain building from source on the
> Alpha architecture.
>
> I'm still going through the NM process, and I believe that once I become a
> DD I'll get access to a Debian Project Alpha.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnet-easytcp-perl
Version : 0.17
Upstream Author : Mina Naguib, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/MNAGUIB/EasyTCP-0.16/
* License : Perl license
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:21:37PM +1100, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote:
> Sorry to raise this at the moment as i'm sure everyone is busy recovering
> from recent events and even though this is probably not the appropriate forum
> all my other efforts have fallen on deaf emails.
-newmaint-discuss is p
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 04:10, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 08:34:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:25:23AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > would be a positive improvement over the status quo); I wonder what
> > > Debian
> > > developers who supp
I am thinking about orphaning xmlto.
It's a very useful package but I am not very uptodate with sgml/xsl and
I know nearly nothing about TeX (and doesn't want to).
So if someone is interested and feels he can do a better job, I would be
happy.
Most current bugs are fixed in the new upstream but u
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnarwl
Version : 2.3
Upstream Author : Patrick Ahlbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.oss.billiton.de
* License : GPL
Description : Email autoresponder bas
I demand that Scott Dier may or may not have written...
> * Yven Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021122 10:43]:
>> Y'see Branden, at least the "get rid of Branden's evil jokes" GR would
>> easily be overthrown :-)
> /me notes that he is generally laughing out loud at most of them.
> Sadly, my coworke
reassign 64071 general
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I noticed that menu generates files in /etc automatically, e.g.
>
> /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook
>
> /etc should be for configuration files only, not automatically generated
> files.
>
> The discussion in debian-devel suggests /var/lib/m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 64071 general
Bug#64071: menu: Automatically generated files should not go to /etc
Bug reassigned from package `menu' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Discussion - non-free software removal"):
> While we're on the subject, can you tell us whether or not the Social
> Contract was specifically one of the documents you had in mind when you
> wrote clause 4.1.5 of the Debian Constituion? Could you answer the same
> ques
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: fontconfig
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fontconfig.org
* License : M
Work are sending me to Asiacrypt, which is in Queenstown from the 1st
to the 5th of December. I'm also going to be taking some time in NZ
for sightseeing etc.
So firstly, I'm going to be away from my email for quite a bit. I may
have some access from NZ, but hotel connectivity is strange and my
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:18:15AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Therefore folks should make top Info nodes with proper headers.
How about a debian Info pages policy.
How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?
Mike Stone
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: uif
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Joerg Platte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://area51.mfh-iserlohn.de/uif
* License : GPL
Description : Advanced iptables-fire
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:41:02AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Reasons for not to expel non-free:
>
> (1) size of non-free section has no practical impact to over all
>archive size (<<3%) No real financial damage.
>See Susan's post Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> (6) Fl
Benoit Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you sometime think at other people's bilities ?
> I'm sure big mirrors don't care, how about those who can't afford
> the expense ? Either because their disks are already full and they
> don't wan't to buy new ones or because buying new ones may me
Dear ,
Thank you for your email to ATI Technologies Canada.
This is an AUTOMATIC RESPONSE from an UNATTENDED mailbox.
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL. Instead, use one of the electronic
support options outlined below.
We have modified our online support to improve the efficiency in respo
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 12:42, Ari Pollak wrote:
> * Package name: fontconfig
First of all, have you talked to Branden about this?
Second, I've been maintaining unofficial packages of fontconfig and xft2
in my "local" repository for quite some time now; see
http://people.debian.org/~walters
T
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:32:47PM -0800, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> Well, no. But then, I've not had to do anything other then use a 2.4
> kernel to get IDE DMA. But most desktop work is letency based and using
> a kernel with the low latency patch and preempt cuts max latency by
> about 6 times b
I have one of my two Multias online 24/7 runnin Woody/stable
that might be of assistance...
Jeremy
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:04:59PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with a package I maintain building from source on the
> Alpha architecture.
>
> I'm s
Clint Adams wrote:
> > No, it's not. Low end disks are cheap. High end disks still aren't.
> > Bandwidth still isn't. Especially when you're spending donated
> > resources rather than your own.
>
> Odd, then, that Debian has turned down resource donations in the past.
Yeah, it's really a pity t
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 04:10, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Actually John, you and Branden seem to be about the only people posting in
> > support of the GR. No doubt there are others who agree, but what makes
> > you think there are so ma
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
***
> Secondly, if anyone in NZ would like to meet up please let me know
> ASAP. It'd be good to go out for a drink or three. Maybe I can even
> teach you Mao :-) (or have a good game if you know it already ...).
> I'll post again when I have flight number
Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -newmaint-discuss is probably better.
Dead list according to lists.debian.org
--
bye Joerg
A.D. 1492:
Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be India, but
which RMS informs him is actually GNU/India.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:45:24AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Once again, we tell mirrors that they can mirror only i386, and that
> would be fine. We already have mirrors that mirror some arches and
> not others, right?
Currently we have a good, solid mirror infrastructure. I can expe
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -newmaint-discuss is probably better.
>
> Dead list according to lists.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not though, and there has been some discussion
there in the past.
--
gram
pgpW8
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:45:24AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Once again, we tell mirrors that they can mirror only i386, and that
> > would be fine. We already have mirrors that mirror some arches and
> > not others, right?
>
> Currentl
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:51:14AM -0500, christophe barbe wrote:
> So if someone is interested and feels he can do a better job, I would be
> happy.
i would be interested in packaging it, but seeing as im not a developer
yet, i would need a sponsor (though i can ask david and see if he might
be w
> Yeah, it's really a pity that we failed to convert mid-end ethernet cards
> and mid-end machines into high-end harddisks, and it's so trivial, isn't
> it?
I seem to remember at least two occasions where offers of the use of
machine, rackspace, and bandwidth were turned down. I think in most
cas
48 matches
Mail list logo
